mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Zero-Shot Active Feature Acquisition via LLM-Elicitation

arXiv 2606.18933 ↗First posted 17 Jun 2026cs.LG cs.IR stat.MEcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Active feature acquisition (AFA) sequentially selects which features to observe to reach a classification or ranking decision. Its central limitation is reliance on large amount of labeled data to fit probabilistic models guiding acquisition. Large language models (LLMs) supply unsupervised domain knowledge, but are poor sequential planners. Asking one to both know and decide conflates capabilities best kept separate. Here, we develop a framework for zero-shot AFA through disciplined elicitation: asking the LLM only for what it can be trusted to return, the unary deviations and pairwise co-variations that are the sufficient statistics of a Markov random field (MRF). We apply our framework to two settings: binary classification and top-k identification. In practice, the LLM reliably returns only discriminative statistics, what distinguishes the classes rather than each class in isolation, which precludes classical AFA. We apply a maximum-entropy closure that resolves this gauge ambiguity. We evaluate on a cohort of Inflammatory Bowel Disease (IBD) patients, an active clinical setting where diagnostic ambiguity and patient heterogeneity obstruct stable treatment strategies. Our framework outperforms the LLM both on real labels and on its own extracted beliefs. Where it matters most, on the hardest patients, our top-k acquisition policy markedly outperforms all existing methods.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 23 of its 40 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 17 Jun 2026.

Builds on

23 of 40 references.

References · 23

  1. 2020Language Models are Few-Shot Learnerscited by 32,419
  2. 2022Chain-of-Thought Prompting Elicits Reasoning in Large Language Modelscited by 12,459
  3. 2023Judging LLM-as-a-Judge with MT-Bench and Chatbot Arenacited by 8,626
  4. 2022Large Language Models are Zero-Shot Reasonerscited by 4,374
  5. 2021Calibrate Before Use: Improving Few-Shot Performance of Language Modelscited by 1,392
  6. 2022PlanBench: An Extensible Benchmark for Evaluating Large Language Models on Planning and Reasoning about Changecited by 382
  7. 2023On the Planning Abilities of Large Language Models : A Critical Investigationcited by 312
  8. 2024On the Self-Verification Limitations of Large Language Models on Reasoning and Planning Taskscited by 142
  9. 2024Large Language Models to Enhance Bayesian Optimizationcited by 135
  10. 2018Preference-based Online Learning with Dueling Bandits: A Surveycited by 102
  11. 2018EDDI: Efficient Dynamic Discovery of High-Value Information with Partial VAEcited by 87
  12. 2023Learning to Maximize Mutual Information for Dynamic Feature Selectioncited by 56
11 more
  1. 2020Active Feature Acquisition with Generative Surrogate Modelscited by 54
  2. 2017Classification with Costly Features using Deep Reinforcement Learningcited by 34
  3. 2024Thought of Search: Planning with Language Models Through The Lens of Efficiencycited by 32
  4. 2023Estimating Conditional Mutual Information for Dynamic Feature Selectioncited by 21
  5. 2023Acquisition Conditioned Oracle for Nongreedy Active Feature Acquisitioncited by 19
  6. 2025A Survey on Active Feature Acquisition Strategiescited by 17
  7. 2025Language-Based Bayesian Optimization Research Assistant (BORA)cited by 15
  8. 2025Extracting Probabilistic Knowledge from Large Language Models for Bayesian Network Parameterizationcited by 15
  9. 2025LLMs for Bayesian Optimization in Scientific Domains: Are We There Yet?cited by 14
  10. 2025AFABench: A Generic Framework for Benchmarking Active Feature Acquisitioncited by 9
  11. 2025Learning-To-Measure: In-Context Active Feature Acquisitioncited by 5

Built on by

Not cited yet.