mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Cooperative SGD with Dynamic Mixing Matrices

arXiv 2508.14565 ↗First posted 20 Aug 2025cs.LG cs.DCcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

One of the most common methods to train machine learning algorithms today is the stochastic gradient descent (SGD). In a distributed setting, SGD-based algorithms have been shown to converge theoretically under specific circumstances. A substantial number of works in the distributed SGD setting assume a fixed topology for the edge devices. These papers also assume that the contribution of nodes to the global model is uniform. However, experiments have shown that such assumptions are suboptimal and a non uniform aggregation strategy coupled with a dynamically shifting topology and client selection can significantly improve the performance of such models. This paper details a unified framework that covers several Local-Update SGD-based distributed algorithms with dynamic topologies and provides improved or matching theoretical guarantees on convergence compared to existing work.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 27 of its 43 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 20 Aug 2025.

Builds on

27 of 43 references.

References · 27

  1. 2016Communication-Efficient Learning of Deep Networks from Decentralized Datacited by 7,669
  2. 2018Federated Optimization in Heterogeneous Networkscited by 2,987
  3. 2017Accurate, Large Minibatch SGD: Training ImageNet in 1 Hourcited by 1,492
  4. 2019On the Convergence of FedAvg on Non-IID Datacited by 1,229
  5. 2016Optimization Methods for Large-Scale Machine Learningcited by 1,150
  6. 2020Tackling the Objective Inconsistency Problem in Heterogeneous Federated Optimizationcited by 906
  7. 2013Stochastic First- and Zeroth-order Methods for Nonconvex Stochastic Programmingcited by 724
  8. 2018Local SGD Converges Fast and Communicates Littlecited by 605
  9. 2020A Unified Theory of Decentralized SGD with Changing Topology and Local Updatescited by 367
  10. 2019FedPAQ: A Communication-Efficient Federated Learning Method with Periodic Averaging and Quantizationcited by 356
  11. 2019Lower Bounds for Non-Convex Stochastic Optimizationcited by 307
  12. 2018Parallel Restarted SGD with Faster Convergence and Less Communication: Demystifying Why Model Averaging Works for Deep Learningcited by 278
15 more
  1. 2019SGD: General Analysis and Improved Ratescited by 207
  2. 2018Don't Use Large Mini-Batches, Use Local SGDcited by 202
  3. 2017Asynchronous Decentralized Parallel Stochastic Gradient Descentcited by 159
  4. 2018Stochastic Gradient Push for Distributed Deep Learningcited by 152
  5. 2017Revisiting Distributed Synchronous SGDcited by 142
  6. 2014Deep learning with Elastic Averaging SGDcited by 90
  7. 2019First Analysis of Local GD on Heterogeneous Datacited by 81
  8. 2020Towards Flexible Device Participation in Federated Learningcited by 65
  9. 2019Decentralized Federated Learning: A Segmented Gossip Approachcited by 64
  10. 2020Fast-Convergent Federated Learningcited by 61
  11. 2018Push-Pull Gradient Methods for Distributed Optimization in Networkscited by 46
  12. 2022A Unified Analysis of Federated Learning with Arbitrary Client Participationcited by 45
  13. 2021FedCostWAvg: A new averaging for better Federated Learningcited by 11
  14. 2023Incentive Mechanism Design for Unbiased Federated Learning with Randomized Client Participationcited by 8
  15. 2023Convergence Analysis of Decentralized ASGDcited by 2

Built on by

Not cited yet.