mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

FedEve: On Bridging the Client Drift and Period Drift for Cross-device Federated Learning

arXiv 2508.14539 ↗First posted 20 Aug 2025cs.LG cs.DCcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Federated learning (FL) is a machine learning paradigm that allows multiple clients to collaboratively train a shared model without exposing their private data. Data heterogeneity is a fundamental challenge in FL, which can result in poor convergence and performance degradation. Client drift has been recognized as one of the factors contributing to this issue resulting from the multiple local updates in FedAvg. However, in cross-device FL, a different form of drift arises due to the partial client participation, but it has not been studied well. This drift, we referred as period drift, occurs as participating clients at each communication round may exhibit distinct data distribution that deviates from that of all clients. It could be more harmful than client drift since the optimization objective shifts with every round. In this paper, we investigate the interaction between period drift and client drift, finding that period drift can have a particularly detrimental effect on cross-device FL as the degree of data heterogeneity increases. To tackle these issues, we propose a predict-observe framework and present an instantiated method, FedEve, where these two types of drift can compensate each other to mitigate their overall impact. We provide theoretical evidence that our approach can reduce the variance of model updates. Extensive experiments demonstrate that our method outperforms alternatives on non-iid data in cross-device settings.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 22 of its 34 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 20 Aug 2025.

Builds on

22 of 34 references.

References · 22

  1. 2016Communication-Efficient Learning of Deep Networks from Decentralized Datacited by 7,669
  2. 2019Advances and Open Problems in Federated Learningcited by 3,046
  3. 2018Federated Optimization in Heterogeneous Networkscited by 2,987
  4. 2019Federated Learning: Challenges, Methods, and Future Directionscited by 1,538
  5. 2018Federated Learning with Non-IID Datacited by 1,108
  6. 2020Adaptive Federated Optimizationcited by 1,046
  7. 2019Measuring the Effects of Non-Identical Data Distribution for Federated Visual Classificationcited by 851
  8. 2018LEAF: A Benchmark for Federated Settingscited by 792
  9. 2020Ensemble Distillation for Robust Model Fusion in Federated Learningcited by 682
  10. 2017Deep Interest Network for Click-Through Rate Predictioncited by 544
  11. 2019Lookahead Optimizer: k steps forward, 1 step backcited by 336
  12. 2019The Non-IID Data Quagmire of Decentralized Machine Learningcited by 305
10 more
  1. 2017Stochastic Gradient Descent as Approximate Bayesian Inferencecited by 300
  2. 2019A Tail-Index Analysis of Stochastic Gradient Noise in Deep Neural Networkscited by 214
  3. 2018Don't Use Large Mini-Batches, Use Local SGDcited by 202
  4. 2018Understanding Short-Horizon Bias in Stochastic Meta-Optimizationcited by 69
  5. 2021Strength of Minibatch Noise in SGDcited by 39
  6. 2023Revisiting the Noise Model of Stochastic Gradient Descentcited by 36
  7. 2023Understanding Generalization of Federated Learning via Stability: Heterogeneity Matterscited by 27
  8. 2021Towards Federated Learning on Time-Evolving Heterogeneous Datacited by 23
  9. 2019Federated Learning with Unbiased Gradient Aggregation and Controllable Meta Updatingcited by 22
  10. 2021A General Theory for Client Sampling in Federated Learningcited by 8

Built on by

Not cited yet.