CAMF: Collaborative Adversarial Multi-agent Framework for Machine Generated Text Detection
On the map: LLM agents and tool use → General LLM agent frameworks and benchmarks
Abstract (arXiv)
Detecting machine-generated text (MGT) from contemporary Large Language Models (LLMs) is increasingly crucial amid risks like disinformation and threats to academic integrity. Existing zero-shot detection paradigms, despite their practicality, often exhibit significant deficiencies. Key challenges include: (1) superficial analyses focused on limited textual attributes, and (2) a lack of investigation into consistency across linguistic dimensions such as style, semantics, and logic. To address these challenges, we introduce the Collaborative Adversarial Multi-agent Framework (CAMF), a novel architecture using multiple LLM-based agents. CAMF employs specialized agents in a synergistic three-phase process: Multi-dimensional Linguistic Feature Extraction, Adversarial Consistency Probing, and Synthesized Judgment Aggregation. This structured collaborative-adversarial process enables a deep analysis of subtle, cross-dimensional textual incongruities indicative of non-human origin. Empirical evaluations demonstrate CAMF's significant superiority over state-of-the-art zero-shot MGT detection techniques.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Placed in General LLM agent frameworks and benchmarks, one of 16 directions in LLM agents and tool use. Builds on 15 of its 32 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 16 Aug 2025.
Builds on
15 of 32 references.
Closest ancestors · 2
Same direction, newest first
- 2023ChatEval: Towards Better LLM-based Evaluators through Multi-Agent Debate14 Aug
- 2023MetaGPT: Meta Programming for A Multi-Agent Collaborative Framework1 Aug
Other references · 13
- 2022ReAct: Synergizing Reasoning and Acting in Language Modelscited by 8,695
- 2023Improving Factuality and Reasoning in Language Models through Multiagent Debatecited by 1,784
- 2021Ethical and social risks of harm from Language Modelscited by 966
- 2023DetectGPT: Zero-Shot Machine-Generated Text Detection using Probability Curvaturecited by 726
- 2023A Watermark for Large Language Modelscited by 725
- 2019GLTR: Statistical Detection and Visualization of Generated Textcited by 496
- 2023The Curse of Recursion: Training on Generated Data Makes Models Forgetcited by 356
- 2023Ghostbuster: Detecting Text Ghostwritten by Large Language Modelscited by 91
- 2025Multi-Modal Multi-Behavior Sequential Recommendation with Conditional Diffusion-Based Feature Denoisingcited by 14
- 2024Ai.llude: Encouraging Rewriting AI-Generated Text to Support Creative Expressioncited by 10
- 2025Coherency Improved Explainable Recommendation via Large Language Modelcited by 3
- 2025Graph Neural Network Enhanced Sequential Recommendation Method for Cross-Platform Ad Campaigncited by 1
Built on by
Not cited yet.
Similar, not cited
Close in wording, no citation either way
- 2026Detecting the Machine: A Comprehensive Benchmark of AI-Generated Text Detectors Across Architectures, Domains, and Adversarial Conditions
- 2025Stress-testing Machine Generated Text Detection: Shifting Language Models Writing Style to Fool Detectors
- 2023Red Teaming Language Model Detectors with Language Models
- 2026Beyond Perplexity: Character Distribution Signatures and the MDTA Benchmark for AI Text Detection
- 2025Kill two birds with one stone: generalized and robust AI-generated text detection via dynamic perturbations
- 2026From Static Benchmarks to Dynamic Protocol: Agent-Centric Text Anomaly Detection for Evaluating LLM Reasoning
- 2026Automatic Hard Example Synthesis with Multi-Level Agentic Data Curation
- 2026A Unified Detection Framework for AI-Related Content and Artifacts