Feedback Indicators: The Alignment between Llama and a Teacher in Language Learning
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Automated feedback generation has the potential to enhance students' learning progress by providing timely and targeted feedback. Moreover, it can assist teachers in optimizing their time, allowing them to focus on more strategic and personalized aspects of teaching. To generate high-quality, information-rich formative feedback, it is essential first to extract relevant indicators, as these serve as the foundation upon which the feedback is constructed. Teachers often employ feedback criteria grids composed of various indicators that they evaluate systematically. This study examines the initial phase of extracting such indicators from students' submissions of a language learning course using the large language model Llama 3.1. Accordingly, the alignment between indicators generated by the LLM and human ratings across various feedback criteria is investigated. The findings demonstrate statistically significant strong correlations, even in cases involving unanticipated combinations of indicators and criteria. The methodology employed in this paper offers a promising foundation for extracting indicators from students' submissions using LLMs. Such indicators can potentially be utilized to auto-generate explainable and transparent formative feedback in future research.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 11 of its 55 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 15 Aug 2025.
Builds on
11 of 55 references.
References · 11
- 2022Training language models to follow instructions with human feedbackcited by 15,971
- 2024The Llama 3 Herd of Modelscited by 14,715
- 2023LLaMA: Open and Efficient Foundation Language Modelscited by 14,132
- 2020Measuring Massive Multitask Language Understandingcited by 7,963
- 2023Siren's Song in the AI Ocean: A Survey on Hallucination in Large Language Modelscited by 698
- 2023Reasoning or Reciting? Exploring the Capabilities and Limitations of Language Models Through Counterfactual Taskscited by 246
- 2024Large Language Models are Inconsistent and Biased Evaluatorscited by 153
- 2023Large language models can accurately predict searcher preferencescited by 131
- 2024A Comprehensive Survey on Process-Oriented Automatic Text Summarization with Exploration of LLM-Based Methodscited by 102
- 2023Extracting Accurate Materials Data from Research Papers with Conversational Language Models and Prompt Engineeringcited by 86
- 2023RewriteLM: An Instruction-Tuned Large Language Model for Text Rewritingcited by 67
Built on by
Not cited yet.
Similar, not cited
Close in wording, no citation either way
- 2026Evaluating Feedback Focus and Pedagogical Adaptivity in LLM-Generated Feedback on Student Writing
- 2025Partnering with AI: A Pedagogical Feedback System for LLM Integration into Programming Education
- 2025Dean of LLM Tutors: A Framework for Automated Quality Review of AI-generated Feedback
- 2026Investigating Learner-Aware Design of LLM-Generated Educational Feedback
- 2025Simulating Student-Tutor Interactions with LLMs for Multilingual Math Feedback
- 2026A Classroom Study of LLM-Generated Feedback Intervention in Introductory Programming
- 2023A Large Language Model Approach to Educational Survey Feedback Analysis
- 2023Let Me Teach You: Pedagogical Foundations of Feedback for Language Models