Decentralized Frank-Wolfe Algorithm for Convex and Non-convex Problems
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Decentralized optimization algorithms have received much attention due to the recent advances in network information processing. However, conventional decentralized algorithms based on projected gradient descent are incapable of handling high dimensional constrained problems, as the projection step becomes computationally prohibitive to compute. To address this problem, this paper adopts a projection-free optimization approach, a.k.a.~the Frank-Wolfe (FW) or conditional gradient algorithm. We first develop a decentralized FW (DeFW) algorithm from the classical FW algorithm. The convergence of the proposed algorithm is studied by viewing the decentralized algorithm as an inexact FW algorithm. Using a diminishing step size rule and letting t be the iteration number, we show that the DeFW algorithm's convergence rate is cal O(1/t) for convex objectives; is cal O(1/t2) for strongly convex objectives with the optimal solution in the interior of the constraint set; and is cal O(1/√t) towards a stationary point for smooth but non-convex objectives. We then show that a consensus-based DeFW algorithm meets the above guarantees with two communication rounds per iteration. Furthermore, we demonstrate the advantages of the proposed DeFW algorithm on low-complexity robust matrix completion and communication efficient sparse learning. Numerical results on synthetic and real data are presented to support our findings.
Key facts. Cited by 11 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 5 Dec 2016.
Builds on
No reference list yet.
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2021: 1; 2022: 4; 2023: 1; 2024: 2; 2025: 1; 2026: 2.
11 papers.
- 2022On the Convergence of Distributed Stochastic Bilevel Optimization Algorithms over a Networkcited by 14
- 2022Decentralized Nonconvex Optimization with Guaranteed Privacy and Accuracycited by 10
- 2023LeanVec: Searching vectors faster by making them fitcited by 5
- 2021How much pre-training is enough to discover a good subnetwork?cited by 4
- 2024Stochastic Constrained Decentralized Optimization for Machine Learning with Fewer Data Oracles: a Gradient Sliding Approachcited by 2
- 2022One Gradient Frank-Wolfe for Decentralized Online Convex and Submodular Optimizationcited by 1
- 2025Sparse Partial Optimal Transport via Quadratic Regularizationcited by 1
- 2022Online Decentralized Frank-Wolfe: From theoretical bound to applications in smart-buildingcited by 0
- 2024Federated Frank-Wolfe Algorithmcited by 0
- 2026Improved Analysis of the Accelerated Noisy Power Method with Applications to Decentralized PCAcited by 0
- 2026Accelerated Algorithm for Sparse Regularized Partial Optimal Transportcited by 0
- 2026Accelerated Algorithm for Sparse Regularized Partial Optimal Transport30 Sep 2026
- 2026Improved Analysis of the Accelerated Noisy Power Method with Applications to Decentralized PCA3 Feb 2026
- 2025Sparse Partial Optimal Transport via Quadratic Regularization11 Aug 2025
- 2024Federated Frank-Wolfe Algorithm19 Aug 2024
- 2024Stochastic Constrained Decentralized Optimization for Machine Learning with Fewer Data Oracles: a Gradient Sliding Approach3 Apr 2024
- 2023LeanVec: Searching vectors faster by making them fit26 Dec 2023
- 2022Decentralized Nonconvex Optimization with Guaranteed Privacy and Accuracy14 Dec 2022
- 2022One Gradient Frank-Wolfe for Decentralized Online Convex and Submodular Optimization30 Oct 2022
- 2022Online Decentralized Frank-Wolfe: From theoretical bound to applications in smart-building31 Jul 2022
- 2022On the Convergence of Distributed Stochastic Bilevel Optimization Algorithms over a Network30 Jun 2022
- 2021How much pre-training is enough to discover a good subnetwork?31 Jul 2021