Learning Robust Satellite Attitude Dynamics with Physics-Informed Normalising Flow
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Attitude control is a fundamental aspect of spacecraft operations. Model Predictive Control (MPC) has emerged as a powerful strategy for these tasks, relying on accurate models of the system dynamics to optimize control actions over a prediction horizon. In scenarios where physics models are incomplete, difficult to derive, or computationally expensive, machine learning offers a flexible alternative by learning the system behavior directly from data. However, purely data-driven models often struggle with generalization and stability, especially when applied to inputs outside their training domain. To address these limitations, we investigate the benefits of incorporating Physics-Informed Neural Networks (PINNs) into the learning of spacecraft attitude dynamics, comparing their performance with that of purely data-driven approaches. Using a Real-valued Non-Volume Preserving (Real NVP) neural network architecture with a self-attention mechanism, we trained several models on simulated data generated with the Basilisk simulator. Two training strategies were considered: a purely data-driven baseline and a physics-informed variant to improve robustness and stability. Our results demonstrate that the inclusion of physics-based information significantly enhances the performance in terms of the mean relative error with the best architectures found by 27.08%. These advantages are particularly evident when the learned models are integrated into an MPC framework, where PINN-based models consistently outperform their purely data-driven counterparts in terms of control accuracy and robustness, and achieve improved settling times when compared to traditional MPC approaches, yielding improvements of up to 62%, when subject to observation noise and RWs friction.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 13 of its 36 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 11 Aug 2025.
Builds on
13 of 36 references.
References · 13
- 2017Attention Is All You Needcited by 60,361
- 2016Density estimation using Real NVPcited by 2,042
- 2017A Structured Self-attentive Sentence Embeddingcited by 318
- 2016Long Short-Term Memory-Networks for Machine Readingcited by 161
- 2020Lagrangian Duality for Constrained Deep Learningcited by 74
- 2021Physics-Informed Neural Nets for Control of Dynamical Systemscited by 31
- 2019Large Scale Model Predictive Control with Neural Networks and Primal Active Setscited by 29
- 2021Physics-informed Neural Networks-based Model Predictive Control for Multi-link Manipulatorscited by 21
- 2024Transformer-based Model Predictive Control: Trajectory Optimization via Sequence Modelingcited by 16
- 2022Neural representation of a time optimal, constant acceleration rendezvouscited by 10
- 2024Physics-Informed Neural Networks for Satellite State Estimationcited by 4
- 2025Robust Power System State Estimation using Physics-Informed Neural Networkscited by 4
1 more
Built on by
Not cited yet.