Physics-Informed Neural Networks for Satellite State Estimation
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
The Space Domain Awareness (SDA) community routinely tracks satellites in orbit by fitting an orbital state to observations made by the Space Surveillance Network (SSN). In order to fit such orbits, an accurate model of the forces that are acting on the satellite is required. Over the past several decades, high-quality, physics-based models have been developed for satellite state estimation and propagation. These models are exceedingly good at estimating and propagating orbital states for non-maneuvering satellites; however, there are several classes of anomalous accelerations that a satellite might experience which are not well-modeled, such as satellites that use low-thrust electric propulsion to modify their orbit. Physics-Informed Neural Networks (PINNs) are a valuable tool for these classes of satellites as they combine physics models with Deep Neural Networks (DNNs), which are highly expressive and versatile function approximators. By combining a physics model with a DNN, the machine learning model need not learn astrodynamics, which results in more efficient and effective utilization of machine learning resources. This paper details the application of PINNs to estimate the orbital state and a continuous, low-amplitude anomalous acceleration profile for satellites. The PINN is trained to learn the unknown acceleration by minimizing the mean square error of observations. We evaluate the performance of pure physics models with PINNs in terms of their observation residuals and their propagation accuracy beyond the fit span of the observations. For a two-day simulation of a GEO satellite using an unmodeled acceleration profile on the order of 10-8 km/s2, the PINN outperformed the best-fit physics model by orders of magnitude for both observation residuals (123 arcsec vs 1.00 arcsec) as well as propagation accuracy (3860 km vs 164 km after five days).
Key facts. Cited by 4 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 6 of its 16 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 28 Mar 2024.
Builds on
6 of 16 references.
References · 6
- 2014Adam: A Method for Stochastic Optimizationcited by 36,960
- 2019PyTorch: An Imperative Style, High-Performance Deep Learning Librarycited by 20,160
- 2018Neural Ordinary Differential Equationscited by 3,733
- 2020Universal Differential Equations for Scientific Machine Learningcited by 345
- 2019Informed Machine Learning -- A Taxonomy and Survey of Integrating Knowledge into Learning Systemscited by 203
- 2019DiffEqFlux.jl - A Julia Library for Neural Differential Equationscited by 33
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2025: 3; 2026: 1.
4 papers.
- 2025PINN-Obs: Physics-Informed Neural Network-Based Observer for Nonlinear Dynamical Systemscited by 1
- 2025Learning Robust Satellite Attitude Dynamics with Physics-Informed Normalising Flowcited by 0
- 2025Analyzing Data Quality and Decay in Mega-Constellations: A Physics-Informed Machine Learning Approachcited by 0
- 2026Hybrid Model Predictive Control with Physics-Informed Neural Network for Satellite Attitude Controlcited by 0
- 2026Hybrid Model Predictive Control with Physics-Informed Neural Network for Satellite Attitude Control17 Feb 2026
- 2025Analyzing Data Quality and Decay in Mega-Constellations: A Physics-Informed Machine Learning Approach13 Oct 2025
- 2025Learning Robust Satellite Attitude Dynamics with Physics-Informed Normalising Flow11 Aug 2025
- 2025PINN-Obs: Physics-Informed Neural Network-Based Observer for Nonlinear Dynamical Systems9 Jul 2025