mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

DatasetResearch: Benchmarking Agent Systems for Demand-Driven Dataset Discovery

arXiv 2508.06960 ↗First posted 9 Aug 2025cs.AI cs.CLcited by 9

On the map: LLM agents and tool use → Web, search, and research agents

Abstract (arXiv)

The rapid advancement of large language models has fundamentally shifted the bottleneck in AI development from computational power to data availability-with countless valuable datasets remaining hidden across specialized repositories, research appendices, and domain platforms. As reasoning capabilities and deep research methodologies continue to evolve, a critical question emerges: can AI agents transcend conventional search to systematically discover any dataset that meets specific user requirements, enabling truly autonomous demand-driven data curation? We introduce DatasetResearch, the first comprehensive benchmark evaluating AI agents' ability to discover and synthesize datasets from 208 real-world demands across knowledge-intensive and reasoning-intensive tasks. Our tri-dimensional evaluation framework reveals a stark reality: even advanced deep research systems achieve only 22% score on our challenging DatasetResearch-pro subset, exposing the vast gap between current capabilities and perfect dataset discovery. Our analysis uncovers a fundamental dichotomy-search agents excel at knowledge tasks through retrieval breadth, while synthesis agents dominate reasoning challenges via structured generation-yet both catastrophically fail on "corner cases" outside existing distributions. These findings establish the first rigorous baseline for dataset discovery agents and illuminate the path toward AI systems capable of finding any dataset in the digital universe. Our benchmark and comprehensive analysis provide the foundation for the next generation of self-improving AI systems and are publicly available at https://github.com/GAIR-NLP/DatasetResearch.

Key facts. Cited by 9 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Placed in Web, search, and research agents, one of 16 directions in LLM agents and tool use. Builds on 34 of its 42 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 9 Aug 2025.

Builds on

34 of 42 references.

Closest ancestors · 4

Same direction, newest first

  1. 2024ScienceAgentBench: Toward Rigorous Assessment of Language Agents for Data-Driven Scientific Discovery7 Oct
  2. 2024BLADE: Benchmarking Language Model Agents for Data-Driven Science19 Aug
  3. 2024DiscoveryBench: Towards Data-Driven Discovery with Large Language Models1 Jul
  4. 2023Prompting Datasets: Data Discovery with Conversational Agents15 Dec

Other references · 30

  1. 2022Training language models to follow instructions with human feedbackcited by 15,712
  2. 2024The Llama 3 Herd of Modelscited by 14,192
  3. 2023Judging LLM-as-a-Judge with MT-Bench and Chatbot Arenacited by 8,393
  4. 2025Qwen3 Technical Reportcited by 8,195
  5. 2025DeepSeek-R1: Incentivizing Reasoning Capability in LLMs via Reinforcement Learningcited by 6,146
  6. 2025Gemini 2.5: Pushing the Frontier with Advanced Reasoning, Multimodality, Long Context, and Next Generation Agentic Capabilitiescited by 3,655
  7. 2023SWE-bench: Can Language Models Resolve Real-World GitHub Issues?cited by 3,193
  8. 2017TriviaQA: A Large Scale Distantly Supervised Challenge Dataset for Reading Comprehensioncited by 2,895
  9. 2024Qwen2 Technical Reportcited by 2,076
  10. 2025Search-R1: Training LLMs to Reason and Leverage Search Engines with Reinforcement Learningcited by 1,371
  11. 2024Qwen2.5-Coder Technical Reportcited by 1,151
  12. 2025BrowseComp: A Simple Yet Challenging Benchmark for Browsing Agentscited by 616
18 more
  1. 2023Are Emergent Abilities of Large Language Models a Mirage?cited by 515
  2. 2025LIMO: Less is More for Reasoningcited by 488
  3. 2025R1-Searcher: Incentivizing the Search Capability in LLMs via Reinforcement Learningcited by 322
  4. 2024ToolSandbox: A Stateful, Conversational, Interactive Evaluation Benchmark for LLM Tool Use Capabilitiescited by 272
  5. 2025DeepResearcher: Scaling Deep Research via Reinforcement Learning in Real-world Environmentscited by 268
  6. 2025SWE-smith: Scaling Data for Software Engineering Agentscited by 255
  7. 2025OctoThinker: Mid-training Incentivizes Reinforcement Learning Scalingcited by 110
  8. 2022Learning from Few Examples: A Summary of Approaches to Few-Shot Learningcited by 86
  9. 2024LLM-based Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learning: Current and Future Directionscited by 67
  10. 2019Question Answering for Privacy Policies: Combining Computational and Legal Perspectivescited by 65
  11. 2025Agent RL Scaling Law: Agent RL with Spontaneous Code Execution for Mathematical Problem Solvingcited by 62
  12. 2025AgentSynth: Scalable Task Generation for Generalist Computer-Use Agentscited by 41
  13. 2024Fine-Tuning and Prompt Optimization: Two Great Steps that Work Better Togethercited by 38
  14. 2024Better Synthetic Data by Retrieving and Transforming Existing Datasetscited by 36
  15. 2025Code Researcher: Deep Research Agent for Large Systems Code and Commit Historycited by 19
  16. 2023DataFinder: Scientific Dataset Recommendation from Natural Language Descriptionscited by 15
  17. 2024MedConceptsQA: Open Source Medical Concepts QA Benchmarkcited by 6
  18. 2025The Impact of Modern AI in Metadata Managementcited by 1

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2025: 1; 2026: 8.

9 papers.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2024DCA-Bench: A Benchmark for Dataset Curation Agents
  2. 2025WebResearcher: Unleashing unbounded reasoning capability in Long-Horizon Agents
  3. 2025DeepResearch Bench: A Comprehensive Benchmark for Deep Research Agents
  4. 2025Making Sense of Data in the Wild: Data Analysis Automation at Scale
  5. 2026DeepResearch-9K: A Challenging Benchmark Dataset of Deep-Research Agent
  6. 2026FIRE-Bench: Evaluating AI Agents on the Rediscovery of Scientific Insights
  7. 2025Dr. Bench: A Multidimensional Evaluation for Deep Research Agents, from Answers to Reports
  8. 2025DeepWideSearch: Benchmarking Depth and Width in Agentic Information Seeking