mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

EiCAP: Beyond Fluency, Probing and Improving Emotional Intelligence in LLMs via Psychologically Grounded Multi-Turn Dialogue

arXiv 2508.06196 ↗First posted 8 Aug 2025cs.CL cs.HCcited by 1

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Large Language Models increasingly serve in emotionally sensitive roles, including mental health support, education, and crisis response, yet they lack a principled framework for assessing or improving Emotional Intelligence (EI). We introduce EiCAP, a unified, psychologically grounded six-layer EI taxonomy operationalized into two complementary resources. EiCAP-Bench is a multi-turn, one-vs-three forced-choice evaluation suite with 3,174 probes across 24 subcategories and cross-turn dependencies that reflect real conversational EI demands. EiCAP-SFT is a 152,820-dialogue supervision corpus aligned to the same taxonomy, enabling controlled, interpretable fine-tuning. Two key findings emerge. First, generic conversational supervised fine-tuning does not confer EI: fine-tuning on UltraChat yields no significant gain in any of the 24 subcategories, with a macro score of 24.6%, near the chance level of 25%. Second, applying EI-grounded LoRA, using approximately 0.8% of parameters, directly to Qwen-2.5-7B-Base achieves significant gains in all 24 subcategories, reaching a macro score of 75.33%, a gain of 51.7 percentage points over Base and 37.1 percentage points over Instruct. Crucially, an ablation shows that the UltraChat pre-stage is counterproductive, reducing performance by 21.4 percentage points: direct EI-grounded training is both necessary and sufficient.

Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 17 of its 68 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 8 Aug 2025.

Builds on

17 of 68 references.

References · 17

  1. 2019Sentence-BERT: Sentence Embeddings using Siamese BERT-Networkscited by 9,170
  2. 2024Gemma 2: Improving Open Language Models at a Practical Sizecited by 1,998
  3. 2017Explanation in Artificial Intelligence: Insights from the Social Sciencescited by 1,206
  4. 2018Model Cards for Model Reportingcited by 1,080
  5. 2023Enhancing Chat Language Models by Scaling High-quality Instructional Conversationscited by 839
  6. 2018MELD: A Multimodal Multi-Party Dataset for Emotion Recognition in Conversationscited by 643
  7. 2020GoEmotions: A Dataset of Fine-Grained Emotionscited by 486
  8. 2021Towards Emotional Support Dialog Systemscited by 299
  9. 2025Preference Leakage: A Contamination Problem in LLM-as-a-judgecited by 125
  10. 2023SoulChat: Improving LLMs' Empathy, Listening, and Comfort Abilities through Fine-tuning with Multi-turn Empathy Conversationscited by 110
  11. 2022Improving Multi-turn Emotional Support Dialogue Generation with Lookahead Strategy Planningcited by 60
  12. 2024Angry Men, Sad Women: Large Language Models Reflect Gendered Stereotypes in Emotion Attributioncited by 40
5 more
  1. 2021SpanEmo: Casting Multi-label Emotion Classification as Span-predictioncited by 37
  2. 2024Enhancing Emotional Generation Capability of Large Language Models via Emotional Chain-of-Thoughtcited by 34
  3. 2023DialogBench: Evaluating LLMs as Human-like Dialogue Systemscited by 31
  4. 2024EmoDynamiX: Emotional Support Dialogue Strategy Prediction by Modelling MiXed Emotions and Discourse Dynamicscited by 9
  5. 2024Analyzing Cultural Representations of Emotions in LLMs through Mixed Emotion Surveycited by 7

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2026: 1.

1 paper.