mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Differentially Private Federated Clustering with Random Rebalancing

arXiv 2508.06183 ↗First posted 8 Aug 2025cs.LG cs.AIcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Federated clustering aims to group similar clients into clusters and produce one model for each cluster. Such a personalization approach typically improves model performance compared with training a single model to serve all clients, but can be more vulnerable to privacy leakage. Directly applying client-level differentially private (DP) mechanisms to federated clustering could degrade the utilities significantly. We identify that such deficiencies are mainly due to the difficulties of averaging privacy noise within each cluster (following standard privacy mechanisms), as the number of clients assigned to the same clusters is uncontrolled. To this end, we propose a simple and effective technique, named RR-Cluster, that can be viewed as a light-weight add-on to many federated clustering algorithms. RR-Cluster achieves reduced privacy noise via randomly rebalancing cluster assignments, guaranteeing a minimum number of clients assigned to each cluster. We analyze the tradeoffs between decreased privacy noise variance and potentially increased bias from incorrect assignments and provide convergence bounds for RR-Clsuter. Empirically, we demonstrate the RR-Cluster plugged into strong federated clustering algorithms results in significantly improved privacy/utility tradeoffs across both synthetic and real-world datasets.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 22 of its 35 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 8 Aug 2025.

Builds on

22 of 35 references.

References · 22

  1. 2016Communication-Efficient Learning of Deep Networks from Decentralized Datacited by 7,669
  2. 2017Fashion-MNIST: a Novel Image Dataset for Benchmarking Machine Learning Algorithmscited by 4,349
  3. 2019Advances and Open Problems in Federated Learningcited by 3,046
  4. 2019Federated Learning: Challenges, Methods, and Future Directionscited by 1,538
  5. 2019On the Convergence of FedAvg on Non-IID Datacited by 1,229
  6. 2018LEAF: A Benchmark for Federated Settingscited by 792
  7. 2017Renyi Differential Privacycited by 650
  8. 2019Federated Learning with Personalization Layerscited by 541
  9. 2020An Efficient Framework for Clustered Federated Learningcited by 511
  10. 2018Subsampled R'enyi Differential Privacy and Analytical Moments Accountantcited by 236
  11. 2021Multi-Center Federated Learning: Clients Clustering for Better Personalizationcited by 113
  12. 2021Heterogeneity for the Win: One-Shot Federated Clusteringcited by 87
10 more
  1. 2022Private Adaptive Optimization with Side Informationcited by 38
  2. 2022On Privacy and Personalization in Cross-Silo Federated Learningcited by 36
  3. 2023Make Landscape Flatter in Differentially Private Federated Learningcited by 33
  4. 2022Motley: Benchmarking Heterogeneity and Personalization in Federated Learningcited by 31
  5. 2021Locally Private k-Means in One Roundcited by 19
  6. 2017Clustering Algorithms for the Centralized and Local Modelscited by 18
  7. 2019Locally Private k-Means Clusteringcited by 15
  8. 2022Scalable Differentially Private Clustering via Hierarchically Separated Treescited by 10
  9. 2023Differentially Private Federated Clustering over Non-IID Datacited by 7
  10. 2024Differentially Private Clustered Federated Learningcited by 4

Built on by

Not cited yet.