mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

PAC Apprenticeship Learning with Bayesian Active Inverse Reinforcement Learning

arXiv 2508.03693 ↗First posted 5 Aug 2025cs.LGcited by 1

On the map: Offline RL and imitation learning from data → Inverse reinforcement learning

also in 1 more
Abstract (arXiv)

As AI systems become increasingly autonomous, reliably aligning their decision-making with human preferences is essential. Inverse reinforcement learning (IRL) offers a promising approach to infer preferences from demonstrations. These preferences can then be used to produce an apprentice policy that performs well on the demonstrated task. However, in domains like autonomous driving or robotics, where errors can have serious consequences, we need not just good average performance but reliable policies with formal guarantees -- yet obtaining sufficient human demonstrations for reliability guarantees can be costly. Active IRL addresses this challenge by strategically selecting the most informative scenarios for human demonstration. We introduce PAC-EIG, an information-theoretic acquisition function that directly targets probably-approximately-correct (PAC) guarantees for the learned policy -- providing the first such theoretical guarantee for active IRL with noisy expert demonstrations. Our method maximises information gain about the regret of the apprentice policy, efficiently identifying states requiring further demonstration. We also present Reward-EIG as an alternative when learning the reward itself is the primary objective. Focusing on finite state-action spaces, we prove convergence bounds, illustrate failure modes of prior heuristic methods, and demonstrate our method's advantages experimentally.

Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Placed in Inverse reinforcement learning, one of 13 directions in Offline RL and imitation learning from data. Builds on 13 of its 30 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 5 Aug 2025.

Builds on

13 of 30 references.

Closest ancestors · 8

Same direction, newest first

  1. 2024Walking the Values in Bayesian Inverse Reinforcement Learning15 Jul
  2. 2023Towards Theoretical Understanding of Inverse Reinforcement Learning25 Apr
  3. 2022Environment Design for Inverse Reinforcement Learning26 Oct
  4. 2022Active Exploration for Inverse Reinforcement Learning18 Jul
  5. 2021A Lower Bound for the Sample Complexity of Inverse Reinforcement Learning7 Mar
  6. 2021Scalable Bayesian Inverse Reinforcement Learning12 Feb
  7. 2019Risk-Aware Active Inverse Reinforcement Learning8 Jan
  8. 2018A Survey of Inverse Reinforcement Learning: Challenges, Methods and Progress18 Jun

Other references · 5

  1. 2017Max-value Entropy Search for Efficient Bayesian Optimizationcited by 206
  2. 2023Modern Bayesian Experimental Designcited by 125
  3. 2020Driving Behavior Modeling using Naturalistic Human Driving Data with Inverse Reinforcement Learningcited by 46
  4. 2018Including Uncertainty when Learning from Human Correctionscited by 15
  5. 2021Interactive Inverse Reinforcement Learning for Cooperative Gamescited by 7

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2026: 1.

1 paper.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2024Toward Information Theoretic Active Inverse Reinforcement Learning
  2. 2022Autonomous Assessment of Demonstration Sufficiency via Bayesian Inverse Reinforcement Learning
  3. 2018Learning a Prior over Intent via Meta-Inverse Reinforcement Learning
  4. 2018Machine Teaching for Inverse Reinforcement Learning: Algorithms and Applications
  5. 2026Nonparametric Bayesian Inverse Reinforcement Learning with Data-Parallel Gibbs Sampling
  6. 2023Is Inverse Reinforcement Learning Harder than Standard Reinforcement Learning? A Theoretical Perspective
  7. 2020Learn to Exceed: Stereo Inverse Reinforcement Learning with Concurrent Policy Optimization
  8. 2020Efficient Exploration of Reward Functions in Inverse Reinforcement Learning via Bayesian Optimization