mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Evaluating and Learning Robust Bandit Policies Under Uncertain Causal Mechanisms

arXiv 2508.02812 ↗First posted 4 Aug 2025cs.LGcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Causal graphical models can encode large amounts structural knowledge, both from the background knowledge of domain experts and the structural knowledge discovered from randomized experiments or observational data. However, though we may know the general structure of causal relationships, we often do not know the exact causal mechanisms. In this work, we propose a causal multi-armed bandit evaluation and learning algorithm that can reason effectively despite uncertainty over conditional probability distributions. Further, we show how conditional independence testing can be used to choose variables for modeling. We find that the structural equation model (SEM) approach gives more accurate evaluations compared to traditional approaches, particularly as the range of possible causal mechanisms grows. Further, the SEM approach learns low-variance policies, and it learns an optimal policy, assuming the model is sufficiently well-specified. Traditional approaches can converge to local extrema or fail to converge at all.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 29 of its 53 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 4 Aug 2025.

Builds on

29 of 53 references.

References · 29

  1. 2019Invariant Risk Minimizationcited by 1,854
  2. 2020Is Pessimism Provably Efficient for Offline RL?cited by 364
  3. 2019Information-Theoretic Considerations in Batch Reinforcement Learningcited by 287
  4. 2019Causal Discovery from Heterogeneous/Nonstationary Data with Independent Changescited by 166
  5. 2017Domain Adaptation by Using Causal Inference to Predict Invariant Conditional Distributionscited by 126
  6. 2018Invariance, Causality and Robustnesscited by 123
  7. 2018Anchor regression: heterogeneous data meets causalitycited by 118
  8. 2016Causal Bandits: Learning Good Interventions via Causal Inferencecited by 101
  9. 2020DoWhy: An End-to-End Library for Causal Inferencecited by 95
  10. 2015External Validity: From Do-Calculus to Transportability Across Populationscited by 75
  11. 2020A causal framework for distribution generalizationcited by 68
  12. 2022DoWhy-GCM: An extension of DoWhy for causal inference in graphical causal modelscited by 41
17 more
  1. 2022Doubly Robust Distributionally Robust Off-Policy Evaluation and Learningcited by 34
  2. 2022Modeling the Data-Generating Process is Necessary for Out-of-Distribution Generalizationcited by 34
  3. 2019Distributionally Robust Counterfactual Risk Minimizationcited by 26
  4. 2020Distributionally Robust Batch Contextual Banditscited by 20
  5. 2022Causal Bandits for Linear Structural Equation Modelscited by 19
  6. 2021Invariant Policy Learning: A Causal Perspectivecited by 17
  7. 2024Logarithmic Smoothing for Pessimistic Off-Policy Evaluation, Selection and Learningcited by 16
  8. 2020Offline Contextual Bandits with Overparameterized Modelscited by 10
  9. 2022Evaluating Robustness to Dataset Shift via Parametric Robustness Setscited by 10
  10. 2023Wasserstein Distributionally Robust Policy Evaluation and Learning for Contextual Banditscited by 10
  11. 2023Policy Learning under Biased Sample Selectioncited by 9
  12. 2024Distributionally Robust Policy Learning under Concept Driftscited by 6
  13. 2020Improving Offline Contextual Bandits with Distributional Robustnesscited by 5
  14. 2014Data mining for censored time-to-event data: A Bayesian network model for predicting cardiovascular risk from electronic health record datacited by 4
  15. 2023Robust Causal Bandits for Linear Modelscited by 4
  16. 2017Self-concordant inclusions: A unified framework for path-following generalized Newton-type algorithmscited by 2
  17. 2024Improved Bound for Robust Causal Bandits with Linear Modelscited by 2

Built on by

Not cited yet.