mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

FedCD: A Fairness-aware Federated Cognitive Diagnosis Framework

arXiv 2508.01296 ↗First posted 2 Aug 2025cs.LG cs.CYcited by 2

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Online intelligent education platforms have generated a vast amount of distributed student learning data. This influx of data presents opportunities for cognitive diagnosis (CD) to assess students' mastery of knowledge concepts while also raising significant data privacy and security challenges. To cope with this issue, federated learning (FL) becomes a promising solution by jointly training models across multiple local clients without sharing their original data. However, the data quality problem, caused by the ability differences and educational context differences between different groups/schools of students, further poses a challenge to the fairness of models. To address this challenge, this paper proposes a fairness-aware federated cognitive diagnosis framework (FedCD) to jointly train CD models built upon a novel parameter decoupling-based personalization strategy, preserving privacy of data and achieving precise and fair diagnosis of students on each client. As an FL paradigm, FedCD trains a local CD model for the students in each client based on its local student learning data, and each client uploads its partial model parameters to the central server for parameter aggregation according to the devised innovative personalization strategy. The main idea of this strategy is to decouple model parameters into two parts: the first is used as locally personalized parameters, containing diagnostic function-related model parameters, to diagnose each client's students fairly; the second is the globally shared parameters across clients and the server, containing exercise embedding parameters, which are updated via fairness-aware aggregation, to alleviate inter-school unfairness. Experiments on three real-world datasets demonstrate the effectiveness of the proposed FedCD framework and the personalization strategy compared to five FL approaches under three CD models.

Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 18 of its 58 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 2 Aug 2025.

Builds on

18 of 58 references.

References · 18

  1. 2016Communication-Efficient Learning of Deep Networks from Decentralized Datacited by 7,669
  2. 2019Advances and Open Problems in Federated Learningcited by 3,046
  3. 2016Neural Architecture Search with Reinforcement Learningcited by 1,499
  4. 2019On the Convergence of FedAvg on Non-IID Datacited by 1,229
  5. 2017Neural Collaborative Filteringcited by 1,111
  6. 2021Federated Learning on Non-IID Data: A Surveycited by 346
  7. 2021Federated Learning for Internet of Things: A Comprehensive Surveycited by 252
  8. 2018Applied Federated Learning: Improving Google Keyboard Query Suggestionscited by 204
  9. 2019Secure Federated Matrix Factorizationcited by 102
  10. 2021FedGNN: Federated Graph Neural Network for Privacy-Preserving Recommendationcited by 98
  11. 2018The History Began from AlexNet: A Comprehensive Survey on Deep Learning Approachescited by 75
  12. 2019Neural Cognitive Diagnosis for Intelligent Education Systemscited by 75
6 more
  1. 2018Learning Private Neural Language Modeling with Attentive Aggregationcited by 49
  2. 2019Meta Matrix Factorization for Federated Rating Predictionscited by 48
  3. 2023GPFedRec: Graph-guided Personalization for Federated Recommendationcited by 18
  4. 2024Inductive Cognitive Diagnosis for Fast Student Learning in Web-Based Online Intelligent Education Systemscited by 16
  5. 2022Self-supervised Graph Learning for Long-tailed Cognitive Diagnosiscited by 13
  6. 2021Accelerating Evolutionary Neural Architecture Search via Multi-Fidelity Evaluationcited by 10

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2025: 1; 2026: 1.

2 papers.