A Context-Aware Dual-Metric Framework for Confidence Estimation in Large Language Models
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Accurate confidence estimation is essential for trustworthy large language models (LLMs) systems, as it empowers the user to determine when to trust outputs and enables reliable deployment in safety-critical applications. Current confidence estimation methods for LLMs neglect the relevance between responses and contextual information, a crucial factor in output quality evaluation, particularly in scenarios where background knowledge is provided. To bridge this gap, we propose CRUX (Context-aware entropy Reduction and Unified consistency eXamination), the first framework that integrates context faithfulness and consistency for confidence estimation via two novel metrics. First, contextual entropy reduction represents data uncertainty with the information gain through contrastive sampling with and without context. Second, unified consistency examination captures potential model uncertainty through the global consistency of the generated answers with and without context. Experiments across three benchmark datasets (CoQA, SQuAD, QuAC) and two domain-specific datasets (BioASQ, EduQG) demonstrate CRUX's effectiveness, achieving the highest AUROC than existing baselines.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 22 of its 32 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 1 Aug 2025.
Builds on
22 of 32 references.
References · 22
- 2024The Llama 3 Herd of Modelscited by 14,715
- 2018Know What You Don't Know: Unanswerable Questions for SQuADcited by 1,554
- 2019Can You Trust Your Model's Uncertainty? Evaluating Predictive Uncertainty Under Dataset Shiftcited by 1,287
- 2023Can LLMs Express Their Uncertainty? An Empirical Evaluation of Confidence Elicitation in LLMscited by 974
- 2018CoQA: A Conversational Question Answering Challengecited by 683
- 2018Predictive Uncertainty Estimation via Prior Networkscited by 557
- 2018QuAC : Question Answering in Contextcited by 381
- 2020Reasoning About Generalization via Conditional Mutual Informationcited by 147
- 2025HalluLens: LLM Hallucination Benchmarkcited by 92
- 2024Can Large Language Models Faithfully Express Their Intrinsic Uncertainty in Words?cited by 87
- 2023A Survey on Uncertainty Quantification Methods for Deep Learningcited by 81
- 2024LUQ: Long-text Uncertainty Quantification for LLMscited by 81
10 more
- 2024Uncertainty Estimation and Quantification for LLMs: A Simple Supervised Approachcited by 76
- 2023DelucionQA: Detecting Hallucinations in Domain-specific Question Answeringcited by 43
- 2025Large Language Models are overconfident and amplify human biascited by 30
- 2024Do LLMs estimate uncertainty well in instruction-following?cited by 26
- 2024Experts Don't Cheat: Learning What You Don't Know By Predicting Pairscited by 19
- 2024Can We Trust LLMs? Mitigate Overconfidence Bias in LLMs through Knowledge Transfercited by 19
- 2019Bayesian Inference for Large Scale Image Classificationcited by 18
- 2022EduQG: A Multi-format Multiple Choice Dataset for the Educational Domaincited by 11
- 2025T2: An Adaptive Test-Time Scaling Strategy for Contextual Question Answeringcited by 6
- 2025QBR: A Question-Bank-Based Approach to Fine-Grained Legal Knowledge Retrieval for the General Publiccited by 2
Built on by
Not cited yet.