mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Watch the Weights: Unsupervised monitoring and control of fine-tuned LLMs

arXiv 2508.00161 ↗First posted 31 Jul 2025cs.LG cs.CLcited by 7

On the map: LLM safety and security → Backdoor and data poisoning attacks

Abstract (arXiv)

The releases of powerful open-weight large language models (LLMs) are often not accompanied by access to their full training data. Existing interpretability methods, particularly those based on activations, often require or assume distributionally similar data. This is a significant limitation when detecting and defending against novel potential threats like backdoors, which are by definition out-of-distribution. In this work, we introduce a new method for understanding, monitoring and controlling fine-tuned LLMs that interprets weights, rather than activations, thereby sidestepping the need for data that is distributionally similar to the unknown training data. We demonstrate that the top singular vectors of the weight difference between a fine-tuned model and its base model correspond to newly acquired behaviors. By monitoring the cosine similarity of activations along these directions, we can detect salient behaviors introduced during fine-tuning with high precision. For backdoored models that bypass safety mechanisms when a secret trigger is present, our method stops up to 100% of attacks with a false positive rate below 1%. For models that have undergone unlearning, we detect inference on erased topics with accuracy up to 95.42% and can even steer the model to recover "unlearned" information. Besides monitoring, our method also shows potential for pre-deployment model auditing: by analyzing commercial instruction-tuned models (OLMo, Llama, Qwen), we are able to uncover model-specific fine-tuning focus including mathematical problem solving, emoji usage, and Midjourney prompt generation.

Key facts. Cited by 7 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Placed in Backdoor and data poisoning attacks, one of 12 directions in LLM safety and security. Builds on 45 of its 61 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 31 Jul 2025.

Builds on

45 of 61 references.

Closest ancestors · 7

Same direction, newest first

  1. 2025Probe before You Talk: Towards Black-box Defense against Backdoor Unalignment for Large Language Models19 Jun
  2. 2024BackdoorLLM: A Comprehensive Benchmark for Backdoor Attacks and Defenses on Large Language Models23 Aug
  3. 2024BEEAR: Embedding-based Adversarial Removal of Safety Backdoors in Instruction-tuned Language Models24 Jun
  4. 2024Sleeper Agents: Training Deceptive LLMs that Persist Through Safety Training10 Jan
  5. 2023Composite Backdoor Attacks Against Large Language Models11 Oct
  6. 2023Backdoor Attacks and Countermeasures in Natural Language Processing Models: A Comprehensive Security Review12 Sep
  7. 2023Backdooring Instruction-Tuned Large Language Models with Virtual Prompt Injection31 Jul

Other references · 38

  1. 2024Qwen2.5 Technical Reportcited by 4,713
  2. 2025Gemma 3 Technical Reportcited by 1,686
  3. 2023Sparse Autoencoders Find Highly Interpretable Features in Language Modelscited by 1,359
  4. 2024HarmBench: A Standardized Evaluation Framework for Automated Red Teaming and Robust Refusalcited by 1,330
  5. 2023Representation Engineering: A Top-Down Approach to AI Transparencycited by 1,239
  6. 2022Editing Models with Task Arithmeticcited by 1,076
  7. 2017BadNets: Identifying Vulnerabilities in the Machine Learning Model Supply Chaincited by 1,052
  8. 2023Enhancing Chat Language Models by Scaling High-quality Instructional Conversationscited by 825
  9. 2022Discovering Latent Knowledge in Language Models Without Supervisioncited by 733
  10. 2024OLMo: Accelerating the Science of Language Modelscited by 599
  11. 2024WildChat: 1M ChatGPT Interaction Logs in the Wildcited by 598
  12. 2024Scaling and evaluating sparse autoencoderscited by 530
26 more
  1. 2024The WMDP Benchmark: Measuring and Reducing Malicious Use With Unlearningcited by 488
  2. 2023LMSYS-Chat-1M: A Large-Scale Real-World LLM Conversation Datasetcited by 449
  3. 2023Who's Harry Potter? Approximate Unlearning in LLMscited by 366
  4. 2024A StrongREJECT for Empty Jailbreakscited by 352
  5. 2024Improving Alignment and Robustness with Circuit Breakerscited by 302
  6. 2024Jumping Ahead: Improving Reconstruction Fidelity with JumpReLU Sparse Autoencoderscited by 283
  7. 2024Massive Activations in Large Language Modelscited by 277
  8. 2023Camels in a Changing Climate: Enhancing LM Adaptation with Tulu 2cited by 227
  9. 2023Task Arithmetic in the Tangent Space: Improved Editing of Pre-Trained Modelscited by 218
  10. 2025AxBench: Steering LLMs? Even Simple Baselines Outperform Sparse Autoencoderscited by 199
  11. 2025Open Problems in Mechanistic Interpretabilitycited by 173
  12. 2024Task Singular Vectors: Reducing Task Interference in Model Mergingcited by 143
  13. 2024BatchTopK Sparse Autoencoderscited by 126
  14. 2023Universal Jailbreak Backdoors from Poisoned Human Feedbackcited by 120
  15. 2024An Adversarial Perspective on Machine Unlearning for AI Safetycited by 113
  16. 2024Large Language Models Reflect the Ideology of their Creatorscited by 56
  17. 2024What Makes and Breaks Safety Fine-tuning? A Mechanistic Studycited by 54
  18. 2023Challenges with unsupervised LLM knowledge discoverycited by 30
  19. 2024Competition Report: Finding Universal Jailbreak Backdoors in Aligned LLMscited by 27
  20. 2025Interpretability in Parameter Space: Minimizing Mechanistic Description Length with Attribution-based Parameter Decompositioncited by 25
  21. 2024JailbreakLens: Interpreting Jailbreak Mechanism in the Lens of Representation and Circuitcited by 21
  22. 2025SAEs Can Improve Unlearning: Dynamic Sparse Autoencoder Guardrails for Precision Unlearning in LLMscited by 21
  23. 2025Stochastic Parameter Decompositioncited by 14
  24. 2025LoX: Low-Rank Extrapolation Robustifies LLM Safety Against Fine-tuningcited by 12
  25. 2025Unlearning vs. Obfuscation: Are We Truly Removing Knowledge?cited by 11
  26. 2025Precise In-Parameter Concept Erasure in Large Language Modelscited by 11

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2025: 3; 2026: 4.

7 papers.