mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Block-Level Weight-Space Structure Persists Under Post-Training: An Empirical Study Across LLM Families

arXiv 2609.26147 ↗First posted 23 Aug 2026cs.LGcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Modern LLMs are deployed as families of post-trained variants (base, instruct, chat, code) derived from a shared set of pre-trained weights. We present an empirical study of how post-training transforms weight-space geometry, covering eight configurations across four architecture families (Qwen2.5, Llama-3.1/3.2, Mistral, Gemma-2). We identify a granularity gap: post-training modifies every tensor (zero of 291-339 tensors remain byte-identical, so hash-based deduplication achieves 0% savings), yet preserves block-level structure (mean cosine similarity exceeds 0.99 and relative Frobenius distance stays below 0.13). Post-training therefore acts as a structured perturbation that shifts every parameter while leaving block-level geometry intact. The property is not universal: independently trained specializations (for example, Qwen2.5-Coder) attain cosine similarity around 0.64 with the general base, indicating a disconnected region of weight space. Perturbation magnitude varies systematically with model scale, architecture family, and post-training recipe. As a practical application, we build LinkerLLM, a lazy loader that aliases shareable blocks across co-resident variants, achieving 18-48% GPU memory savings and enabling up to five 7B-parameter variants on a single 24 GB consumer GPU. Five of eight configurations retain at least 94% of the unshared variant's quality on MMLU, ARC-Challenge, HellaSwag, and WinoGrande; the remaining three (Mistral-7B, Gemma-2-2B, Llama-3.2-1B) have one below-threshold benchmark each (87-91%), which we report transparently rather than gate the block-sharing decision on a single threshold.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 17 of its 20 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 23 Aug 2026.

Builds on

17 of 20 references.

References · 17

  1. 2024The Llama 3 Herd of Modelscited by 14,192
  2. 2023Efficient Memory Management for Large Language Model Serving with PagedAttentioncited by 5,767
  3. 2024Qwen2 Technical Reportcited by 2,076
  4. 2022Model soups: averaging weights of multiple fine-tuned models improves accuracy without increasing inference timecited by 1,366
  5. 2023SGLang: Efficient Execution of Structured Language Model Programscited by 1,107
  6. 2022Editing Models with Task Arithmeticcited by 1,076
  7. 2023TIES-Merging: Resolving Interference When Merging Modelscited by 795
  8. 2023Language Models are Super Mario: Absorbing Abilities from Homologous Models as a Free Lunchcited by 679
  9. 2019Linear Mode Connectivity and the Lottery Ticket Hypothesiscited by 627
  10. 2022Git Re-Basin: Merging Models modulo Permutation Symmetriescited by 460
  11. 2021The Role of Permutation Invariance in Linear Mode Connectivity of Neural Networkscited by 285
  12. 2023S-LoRA: Serving Thousands of Concurrent LoRA Adapterscited by 146
5 more
  1. 2023Punica: Multi-Tenant LoRA Servingcited by 80
  2. 2023DeltaZip: Efficient Serving of Multiple Full-Model-Tuned LLMscited by 17
  3. 2025Generalized Linear Mode Connectivity for Transformerscited by 14
  4. 2025Watch the Weights: Unsupervised monitoring and control of fine-tuned LLMscited by 7
  5. 2025ZipLLM: Efficient LLM Storage via Model-Aware Synergistic Data Deduplication and Compressioncited by 5

Built on by

Not cited yet.