mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Precise In-Parameter Concept Erasure in Large Language Models

arXiv 2505.22586 ↗First posted 28 May 2025cs.CLcited by 11

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Large language models (LLMs) often acquire knowledge during pretraining that is undesirable in downstream deployments, e.g., sensitive information or copyrighted content. Existing approaches for removing such knowledge rely on fine-tuning, training low-rank adapters or fact-level editing, but these are either too coarse, too shallow, or ineffective. In this work, we propose PISCES (Precise In-parameter Suppression for Concept EraSure), a novel framework for precisely erasing entire concepts from model parameters by directly editing directions that encode them in parameter space. PISCES uses a disentangler model to decompose MLP vectors into interpretable features, identifies those associated with a target concept using automated interpretability techniques, and removes them from model parameters. Experiments on Gemma 2 and Llama 3.1 over various concepts show that PISCES achieves modest gains in efficacy over leading erasure methods, reducing accuracy on the target concept to as low as 7.7%, while dramatically improving erasure specificity (by up to 31%) and robustness (by up to 38%). Overall, these results demonstrate that feature-based in-parameter editing enables a more precise and reliable approach for removing conceptual knowledge in language models.

Key facts. Cited by 11 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 59 of its 87 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 28 May 2025.

Builds on

59 of 87 references.

References · 59

  1. 2020Language Models are Few-Shot Learnerscited by 32,419
  2. 2024The Llama 3 Herd of Modelscited by 14,715
  3. 2019RoBERTa: A Robustly Optimized BERT Pretraining Approachcited by 13,372
  4. 2019Sentence-BERT: Sentence Embeddings using Siamese BERT-Networkscited by 9,170
  5. 2020Measuring Massive Multitask Language Understandingcited by 7,963
  6. 2020Scaling Laws for Neural Language Modelscited by 6,586
  7. 2022Locating and Editing Factual Associations in GPTcited by 2,691
  8. 2019HuggingFace's Transformers: State-of-the-art Natural Language Processingcited by 2,218
  9. 2019Language Models as Knowledge Bases?cited by 1,936
  10. 2018Know What You Don't Know: Unanswerable Questions for SQuADcited by 1,554
  11. 2023Sparse Autoencoders Find Highly Interpretable Features in Language Modelscited by 1,420
  12. 2020Transformer Feed-Forward Layers Are Key-Value Memoriescited by 1,336
38 more
  1. 2016Man is to Computer Programmer as Woman is to Homemaker? Debiasing Word Embeddingscited by 1,312
  2. 2023Steering Llama 2 via Contrastive Activation Additioncited by 1,085
  3. 2024Refusal in Language Models Is Mediated by a Single Directioncited by 1,032
  4. 2022Mass-Editing Memory in a Transformercited by 1,001
  5. 2020How Much Knowledge Can You Pack Into the Parameters of a Language Model?cited by 719
  6. 2022Transformer Feed-Forward Layers Build Predictions by Promoting Concepts in the Vocabulary Spacecited by 532
  7. 2023Dissecting Recall of Factual Associations in Auto-Regressive Language Modelscited by 528
  8. 2024Negative Preference Optimization: From Catastrophic Collapse to Effective Unlearningcited by 504
  9. 2019Making AI Forget You: Data Deletion in Machine Learningcited by 465
  10. 2020Null It Out: Guarding Protected Attributes by Iterative Nullspace Projectioncited by 455
  11. 2024Sparse Feature Circuits: Discovering and Editing Interpretable Causal Graphs in Language Modelscited by 435
  12. 2024Gemma Scope: Open Sparse Autoencoders Everywhere All At Once on Gemma 2cited by 394
  13. 2023Who's Harry Potter? Approximate Unlearning in LLMscited by 381
  14. 2021Pay Attention to MLPscited by 368
  15. 2023Finding Neurons in a Haystack: Case Studies with Sparse Probingcited by 334
  16. 2024Improving Alignment and Robustness with Circuit Breakerscited by 322
  17. 2023LEACE: Perfect linear concept erasure in closed formcited by 267
  18. 2025AxBench: Steering LLMs? Even Simple Baselines Outperform Sparse Autoencoderscited by 218
  19. 2023Finding Alignments Between Interpretable Causal Variables and Distributed Neural Representationscited by 209
  20. 2024Llama Scope: Extracting Millions of Features from Llama-3.1-8B with Sparse Autoencoderscited by 143
  21. 2024An Adversarial Perspective on Machine Unlearning for AI Safetycited by 123
  22. 2023Neurons in Large Language Models: Dead, N-gram, Positionalcited by 88
  23. 2024Unlearning or Obfuscating? Jogging the Memory of Unlearned LLMs via Benign Relearningcited by 84
  24. 2021Neuron-level Interpretation of Deep NLP Models: A Surveycited by 81
  25. 2024RAVEL: Evaluating Interpretability Methods on Disentangling Language Model Representationscited by 79
  26. 2025The Alternative Annotator Test for LLM-as-a-Judge: How to Statistically Justify Replacing Human Annotators with LLMscited by 74
  27. 2024Do Unlearning Methods Remove Information from Language Model Weights?cited by 73
  28. 2024Position: LLM Unlearning Benchmarks are Weak Measures of Progresscited by 63
  29. 2024Applying sparse autoencoders to unlearn knowledge in language modelscited by 59
  30. 2022Discovering Latent Concepts Learned in BERTcited by 56
  31. 2025Open Problems in Machine Unlearning for AI Safetycited by 51
  32. 2024Machine Unlearning in Generative AI: A Surveycited by 49
  33. 2025Enhancing Automated Interpretability with Output-Centric Feature Descriptionscited by 41
  34. 2024WilKE: Wise-Layer Knowledge Editor for Lifelong Knowledge Editingcited by 40
  35. 2024Threats, Attacks, and Defenses in Machine Unlearning: A Surveycited by 39
  36. 2022Analyzing Encoded Concepts in Transformer Language Modelscited by 38
  37. 2024Erasing Conceptual Knowledge from Language Modelscited by 34
  38. 2024Large Language Models Relearn Removed Conceptscited by 27

50 most cited of 59 All 59 (JSON)

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2025: 3; 2026: 8.

11 papers.