What's Taboo for You? - An Empirical Evaluation of LLMs Behavior Toward Sensitive Content
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Proprietary Large Language Models (LLMs) have shown tendencies toward politeness, formality, and implicit content moderation. While previous research has primarily focused on explicitly training models to moderate and detoxify sensitive content, there has been limited exploration of whether LLMs implicitly sanitize language without explicit instructions. This study empirically analyzes the implicit moderation behavior of GPT-4o-mini when paraphrasing sensitive content and evaluates the extent of sensitivity shifts. Our experiments indicate that GPT-4o-mini systematically moderates content toward less sensitive classes, with substantial reductions in derogatory and taboo language. Also, we evaluate the zero-shot capabilities of LLMs in classifying sentence sensitivity, comparing their performances against traditional methods.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 11 of its 32 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 31 Jul 2025.
Builds on
11 of 32 references.
References · 11
- 2018BERT: Pre-training of Deep Bidirectional Transformers for Language Understandingcited by 40,399
- 2022Training language models to follow instructions with human feedbackcited by 15,971
- 2019Exploring the Limits of Transfer Learning with a Unified Text-to-Text Transformercited by 14,599
- 2022Constitutional AI: Harmlessness from AI Feedbackcited by 3,050
- 2024Phi-3 Technical Report: A Highly Capable Language Model Locally on Your Phonecited by 1,917
- 2020RealToxicityPrompts: Evaluating Neural Toxic Degeneration in Language Modelscited by 1,255
- 2023ChatGPT Outperforms Crowd-Workers for Text-Annotation Taskscited by 870
- 2020Politeness Transfer: A Tag and Generate Approachcited by 78
- 2018Polite Dialogue Generation Without Parallel Datacited by 59
- 2021Text Detoxification using Large Pre-trained Neural Modelscited by 52
- 2023Demonstrations Are All You Need: Advancing Offensive Content Paraphrasing using In-Context Learningcited by 5
Built on by
Not cited yet.