LLM-Assisted Cheating Detection in Korean Language via Keystrokes
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
This paper presents a keystroke-based framework for detecting LLM-assisted cheating in Korean, addressing key gaps in prior research regarding language coverage, cognitive context, and the granularity of LLM involvement. Our proposed dataset includes 69 participants who completed writing tasks under three conditions: Bona fide writing, paraphrasing ChatGPT responses, and transcribing ChatGPT responses. Each task spans six cognitive processes defined in Bloom's Taxonomy (remember, understand, apply, analyze, evaluate, and create). We extract interpretable temporal and rhythmic features and evaluate multiple classifiers under both Cognition-Aware and Cognition-Unaware settings. Temporal features perform well under Cognition-Aware evaluation scenarios, while rhythmic features generalize better under cross-cognition scenarios. Moreover, detecting bona fide and transcribed responses was easier than paraphrased ones for both the proposed models and human evaluators, with the models significantly outperforming the humans. Our findings affirm that keystroke dynamics facilitate reliable detection of LLM-assisted writing across varying cognitive demands and writing strategies, including paraphrasing and transcribing LLM-generated responses.
Key facts. Cited by 3 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 10 of its 53 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 29 Jul 2025.
Builds on
10 of 53 references.
References · 10
- 2021TypeNet: Deep Learning Keystroke Biometricscited by 19
- 2023Synthesizing Human Gaze Feedback for Improved NLP Performancecited by 16
- 2016Keystroke dynamics as signal for shallow syntactic parsingcited by 8
- 2022TypeFormer: Transformers for Mobile Keystroke Biometricscited by 7
- 2017Continuous Authentication Using One-class Classifiers and their Fusioncited by 6
- 2023Keystroke Dynamics: Concepts, Techniques, and Applicationscited by 6
- 2024Keystroke Dynamics Against Academic Dishonesty in the Age of LLMscited by 6
- 2021E-cheating Prevention Measures: Detection of Cheating at Online Examinations Using Deep Learning Approach -- A Case Studycited by 4
- 2023Spotting Fake Profiles in Social Networks via Keystroke Dynamicscited by 3
- 2024IEEE BigData 2023 Keystroke Verification Challenge (KVC)cited by 3
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2026: 3.
3 papers.
- 2026On the Insecurity of Keystroke-Based AI Authorship Detection: Timing-Forgery Attacks Against Motor-Signal Verificationcited by 3
- 2026Does AI Assistance Leave a Temporal Fingerprint? Detecting Overreliance in AI-Assisted Writing and Programmingcited by 0
- 2026Detecting GPT-Assisted Writing Using Interpretable Stylometric Featurescited by 0
- 2026Detecting GPT-Assisted Writing Using Interpretable Stylometric Features22 Sep 2026
- 2026Does AI Assistance Leave a Temporal Fingerprint? Detecting Overreliance in AI-Assisted Writing and Programming15 Sep 2026
- 2026On the Insecurity of Keystroke-Based AI Authorship Detection: Timing-Forgery Attacks Against Motor-Signal Verification24 Jan 2026