Keystroke Dynamics Against Academic Dishonesty in the Age of LLMs
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
The transition to online examinations and assignments raises significant concerns about academic integrity. Traditional plagiarism detection systems often struggle to identify instances of intelligent cheating, particularly when students utilize advanced generative AI tools to craft their responses. This study proposes a keystroke dynamics-based method to differentiate between bona fide and assisted writing within academic contexts. To facilitate this, a dataset was developed to capture the keystroke patterns of individuals engaged in writing tasks, both with and without the assistance of generative AI. The detector, trained using a modified TypeNet architecture, achieved accuracies ranging from 74.98% to 85.72% in condition-specific scenarios and from 52.24% to 80.54% in condition-agnostic scenarios. The findings highlight significant differences in keystroke dynamics between genuine and assisted writing. The outcomes of this study enhance our understanding of how users interact with generative AI and have implications for improving the reliability of digital educational platforms.
Key facts. Cited by 6 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 11 of its 54 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 21 Jun 2024.
Builds on
11 of 54 references.
References · 11
- 2017Attention Is All You Needcited by 59,932
- 2022Real or Fake Text?: Investigating Human Ability to Detect Boundaries Between Human-Written and Machine-Generated Textcited by 63
- 2023ChatGPT vs Human-authored Text: Insights into Controllable Text Summarization and Sentence Style Transfercited by 49
- 2021TypeNet: Deep Learning Keystroke Biometricscited by 19
- 2023Synthesizing Human Gaze Feedback for Improved NLP Performancecited by 16
- 2023Distinguishing Human Generated Text From ChatGPT Generated Text Using Machine Learningcited by 10
- 2020Fast Free-text Authentication via Instance-based Keystroke Dynamicscited by 8
- 2020Keystroke Biometrics in Response to Fake News Propagation in a Global Pandemiccited by 4
- 2021E-cheating Prevention Measures: Detection of Cheating at Online Examinations Using Deep Learning Approach -- A Case Studycited by 4
- 2023Spotting Fake Profiles in Social Networks via Keystroke Dynamicscited by 3
- 2020On the Inference of Soft Biometrics from Typing Patterns Collected in a Multi-device Environmentcited by 2
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2025: 2; 2026: 4.
6 papers.
- 2025LLM-Assisted Cheating Detection in Korean Language via Keystrokescited by 3
- 2026On the Insecurity of Keystroke-Based AI Authorship Detection: Timing-Forgery Attacks Against Motor-Signal Verificationcited by 2
- 2025Weak Links in LinkedIn: Enhancing Fake Profile Detection in the Age of LLMscited by 0
- 2026Integrity Shield A System for Ethical AI Use & Authorship Transparency in Assessmentscited by 0
- 2026Does AI Assistance Leave a Temporal Fingerprint? Detecting Overreliance in AI-Assisted Writing and Programmingcited by 0
- 2026Detecting GPT-Assisted Writing Using Interpretable Stylometric Featurescited by 0
- 2026Detecting GPT-Assisted Writing Using Interpretable Stylometric Features22 Sep 2026
- 2026Does AI Assistance Leave a Temporal Fingerprint? Detecting Overreliance in AI-Assisted Writing and Programming15 Sep 2026
- 2026On the Insecurity of Keystroke-Based AI Authorship Detection: Timing-Forgery Attacks Against Motor-Signal Verification24 Jan 2026
- 2026Integrity Shield A System for Ethical AI Use & Authorship Transparency in Assessments16 Jan 2026
- 2025LLM-Assisted Cheating Detection in Korean Language via Keystrokes29 Jul 2025
- 2025Weak Links in LinkedIn: Enhancing Fake Profile Detection in the Age of LLMs21 Jul 2025