mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

ELMES: An Automated Framework for Evaluating Large Language Models in Educational Scenarios

arXiv 2507.22947 ↗First posted 27 Jul 2025cs.CY cs.CL cs.LGcited by 4

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

The emergence of Large Language Models (LLMs) presents transformative opportunities for education, generating numerous novel application scenarios. However, significant challenges remain: evaluation metrics vary substantially across different educational scenarios, while many emerging scenarios lack appropriate assessment metrics. Current benchmarks predominantly measure general intelligence rather than pedagogical capabilities. To address this gap, we introduce ELMES, an open-source automated evaluation framework specifically designed for assessing LLMs in educational settings. ELMES features a modular architecture that enables researchers to create dynamic, multi-agent dialogues through simple configuration files, facilitating flexible scenario design without requiring extensive programming expertise. The framework incorporates a hybrid evaluation engine that objectively quantifies traditionally subjective pedagogical metrics using an LLM-as-a-Judge methodology. We conduct systematic benchmarking of state-of-the-art LLMs across four critical educational scenarios: Knowledge Point Explanation, Guided Problem-Solving Teaching, Interdisciplinary Lesson Plan Generation, and Contextualized Question Generation, employing fine-grained metrics developed in collaboration with education specialists. Our results demonstrate distinct capability distributions among models, revealing context-specific strengths and limitations. ELMES provides educators and researchers with an accessible evaluation framework that significantly reduces adaptation barriers for diverse educational applications while advancing the practical implementation of LLMs in pedagogy. The framework is publicly available at https://github.com/sii-research/elmes.git.

Key facts. Cited by 4 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 15 of its 22 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 27 Jul 2025.

Builds on

15 of 22 references.

References · 15

  1. 2025Qwen3 Technical Reportcited by 8,820
  2. 2020Measuring Massive Multitask Language Understandingcited by 7,963
  3. 2025DeepSeek-R1: Incentivizing Reasoning Capability in LLMs via Reinforcement Learningcited by 6,330
  4. 2018GLUE: A Multi-Task Benchmark and Analysis Platform for Natural Language Understandingcited by 4,899
  5. 2024GPT-4o System Cardcited by 4,588
  6. 2025Gemini 2.5: Pushing the Frontier with Advanced Reasoning, Multimodality, Long Context, and Next Generation Agentic Capabilitiescited by 3,796
  7. 2023GPQA: A Graduate-Level Google-Proof Q&A Benchmarkcited by 2,879
  8. 2024Qwen2 Technical Reportcited by 2,120
  9. 2019SuperGlue: Learning Feature Matching with Graph Neural Networkscited by 1,443
  10. 2023C-Eval: A Multi-Level Multi-Discipline Chinese Evaluation Suite for Foundation Modelscited by 708
  11. 2024Large Language Models for Education: A Survey and Outlookcited by 188
  12. 2024MathBench: Evaluating the Theory and Application Proficiency of LLMs with a Hierarchical Mathematics Benchmarkcited by 105
3 more
  1. 2024HelloBench: Evaluating Long Text Generation Capabilities of Large Language Modelscited by 44
  2. 2024Dr.Academy: A Benchmark for Evaluating Questioning Capability in Education for Large Language Modelscited by 6
  3. 2025Generating Pedagogically Meaningful Visuals for Math Word Problems: A New Benchmark and Analysis of Text-to-Image Modelscited by 5

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2025: 1; 2026: 3.

4 papers.