mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

RecGPT Technical Report

arXiv 2507.22879 ↗First posted 30 Jul 2025cs.IR cs.CLcited by 11

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Recommender systems are among the most impactful applications of artificial intelligence, serving as critical infrastructure connecting users, merchants, and platforms. However, most current industrial systems remain heavily reliant on historical co-occurrence patterns and log-fitting objectives, i.e., optimizing for past user interactions without explicitly modeling user intent. This log-fitting approach often leads to overfitting to narrow historical preferences, failing to capture users' evolving and latent interests. As a result, it reinforces filter bubbles and long-tail phenomena, ultimately harming user experience and threatening the sustainability of the whole recommendation ecosystem. To address these challenges, we rethink the overall design paradigm of recommender systems and propose RecGPT, a next-generation framework that places user intent at the center of the recommendation pipeline. By integrating large language models (LLMs) into key stages of user interest mining, item retrieval, and explanation generation, RecGPT transforms log-fitting recommendation into an intent-centric process. To effectively align general-purpose LLMs to the above domain-specific recommendation tasks at scale, RecGPT incorporates a multi-stage training paradigm, which integrates reasoning-enhanced pre-alignment and self-training evolution, guided by a Human-LLM cooperative judge system. Currently, RecGPT has been fully deployed on the Taobao App. Online experiments demonstrate that RecGPT achieves consistent performance gains across stakeholders: users benefit from increased content diversity and satisfaction, merchants and the platform gain greater exposure and conversions. These comprehensive improvement results across all stakeholders validates that LLM-driven, intent-centric design can foster a more sustainable and mutually beneficial recommendation ecosystem.

Key facts. Cited by 11 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 26 of its 38 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 30 Jul 2025.

Builds on

26 of 38 references.

References · 26

  1. 2025Qwen3 Technical Reportcited by 8,820
  2. 2023Judging LLM-as-a-Judge with MT-Bench and Chatbot Arenacited by 8,626
  3. 2025DeepSeek-R1: Incentivizing Reasoning Capability in LLMs via Reinforcement Learningcited by 6,330
  4. 2023A Survey of Large Language Modelscited by 2,576
  5. 2024A Survey on LLM-as-a-Judgecited by 1,423
  6. 2023Open Problems and Fundamental Limitations of Reinforcement Learning from Human Feedbackcited by 759
  7. 2020Graph Neural Networks in Recommender Systems: A Surveycited by 494
  8. 2023Understanding the Effects of RLHF on LLM Generalisation and Diversitycited by 396
  9. 2023A Survey on Large Language Models for Recommendationcited by 379
  10. 2024MLLM-as-a-Judge: Assessing Multimodal LLM-as-a-Judge with Vision-Language Benchmarkcited by 372
  11. 2024Justice or Prejudice? Quantifying Biases in LLM-as-a-Judgecited by 368
  12. 2023A Survey of Reinforcement Learning from Human Feedbackcited by 264
14 more
  1. 2021Curriculum Learning: A Surveycited by 259
  2. 2025Inference-Time Scaling for Generalist Reward Modelingcited by 239
  3. 2023Recommender Systems in the Era of Large Language Models (LLMs)cited by 189
  4. 2025OneRec: Unifying Retrieve and Rank with Generative Recommender and Iterative Preference Alignmentcited by 173
  5. 2025Reinforcement Learning Optimization for Large-Scale Learning: An Efficient and User-Friendly Scaling Librarycited by 101
  6. 2024Bias and Unfairness in Information Retrieval Systems: New Challenges in the LLM Eracited by 98
  7. 2014Curriculum Learning of Multiple Taskscited by 66
  8. 2024Can You Trust LLM Judgments? Reliability of LLM-as-a-Judgecited by 56
  9. 2025Reward Reasoning Modelcited by 47
  10. 2023Alleviating Matthew Effect of Offline Reinforcement Learning in Interactive Recommendationcited by 38
  11. 2024LLM-as-a-Judge & Reward Model: What They Can and Cannot Docited by 32
  12. 2022User-controllable Recommendation Against Filter Bubblescited by 22
  13. 2025ReasonGRM: Enhancing Generative Reward Models through Large Reasoning Modelscited by 9
  14. 2025Explainable Recommendation with Simulated Human Feedbackcited by 1

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2025: 2; 2026: 9.

11 papers.