DGP: A Dual-Granularity Prompting Framework for Fraud Detection with Graph-Enhanced LLMs
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Real-world fraud detection applications benefit from graph learning techniques that jointly exploit node features, often rich in textual data, and graph structural information. Recently, Graph-Enhanced LLMs emerge as a promising graph learning approach that converts graph information into prompts, exploiting LLMs' ability to reason over both textual and structural information. Among them, text-only prompting, which converts graph information to prompts consisting solely of text tokens, offers a solution that relies only on LLM tuning without requiring additional graph-specific encoders. However, text-only prompting struggles on heterogeneous fraud-detection graphs: multi-hop relations expand exponentially with each additional hop, leading to rapidly growing neighborhoods associated with dense textual information. These neighborhoods may overwhelm the model with long, irrelevant content in the prompt and suppress key signals from the target node, thereby degrading performance. To address this challenge, we propose Dual Granularity Prompting (DGP), which mitigates information overload by preserving fine-grained textual details for the target node while summarizing neighbor information into coarse-grained text prompts. DGP introduces tailored summarization strategies for different data modalities, bi-level semantic abstraction for textual fields and statistical aggregation for numerical features, enabling effective compression of verbose neighbor content into concise, informative prompts. Experiments across public and industrial datasets demonstrate that DGP operates within a manageable token budget while improving fraud detection performance by up to 6.8% (AUPRC) over state-of-the-art methods, showing the potential of Graph-Enhanced LLMs for fraud detection.
Key facts. Cited by 12 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 16 of its 35 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 29 Jul 2025.
Builds on
16 of 35 references.
References · 16
- 2017Attention Is All You Needcited by 60,361
- 2016Semi-Supervised Classification with Graph Convolutional Networkscited by 11,361
- 2017Graph Attention Networkscited by 8,923
- 2017Inductive Representation Learning on Large Graphscited by 6,320
- 2023Lost in the Middle: How Language Models Use Long Contextscited by 3,455
- 2020Heterogeneous Graph Transformercited by 582
- 2020Enhancing Graph Neural Network-based Fraud Detectors against Camouflaged Fraudsterscited by 250
- 2023Language is All a Graph Needscited by 220
- 2013From Amateurs to Connoisseurs: Modeling the Evolution of User Expertise through Online Reviewscited by 108
- 2024Transformers need glasses! Information over-squashing in language taskscited by 91
- 2024Partitioning Message Passing for Graph Fraud Detectioncited by 23
- 2025LLM as GNN: Graph Vocabulary Learning for Text-Attributed Graph Foundation Modelscited by 22
4 more
- 2025Long-Context Generalization with Sparse Attentioncited by 21
- 2023Revisiting Graph-Based Fraud Detection in Sight of Heterophily and Spectrumcited by 20
- 2023Efficient Heterogeneous Graph Learning via Random Projectioncited by 16
- 2018NHAD: Neuro-Fuzzy Based Horizontal Anomaly Detection In Online Social Networkscited by 4
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2025: 2; 2026: 10.
12 papers.
- 2026CAMERA: Adapting to Semantic Camouflage in Unsupervised Text-Attributed Graph Fraud Detectioncited by 3
- 2025SHERLOCK: Towards Dynamic Knowledge Adaptation in LLM-enhanced E-commerce Risk Managementcited by 1
- 2025Human-Centered LLM-Agent System for Detecting Anomalous Digital Asset Transactionscited by 1
- 2026Let Relations Speak: An End-to-End LLM-GNN Soft Prompt Framework for Fraud Detectioncited by 1
- 2026LLM+Graph@VLDB'2025 Workshop Summarycited by 0
- 2026Beyond the Aggregation Dilemma: Prior-Retaining Decoupled Learning for Multimodal Graphscited by 0
- 2026L2IR: Revealing Latent Intent in Graph Fraud Detectioncited by 0
- 2026Node-to-Neighborhood Semantic Consistency: Text-Topology Alignment for TAGs Anomaly Detectioncited by 0
- 2026Operational Evidence Gaps for LLMs in Fraud Detection and Trust-and-Safety Workflowscited by 0
- 2026FinFraudBench: A Heterogeneous Graph Benchmark for Financial Fraud Detectioncited by 0
- 2026Reasoning through Evolution: Automatic Meta-path Discovery for LLM-based Fake News Detectioncited by 0
- 2026FRACTION: Fraud Explanation Generation via Agentic Graph Context Navigationcited by 0
- 2026FRACTION: Fraud Explanation Generation via Agentic Graph Context Navigation13 Oct 2026
- 2026Reasoning through Evolution: Automatic Meta-path Discovery for LLM-based Fake News Detection16 Sep 2026
- 2026FinFraudBench: A Heterogeneous Graph Benchmark for Financial Fraud Detection15 Aug 2026
- 2026Operational Evidence Gaps for LLMs in Fraud Detection and Trust-and-Safety Workflows12 Jul 2026
- 2026Node-to-Neighborhood Semantic Consistency: Text-Topology Alignment for TAGs Anomaly Detection29 Jun 2026
- 2026Let Relations Speak: An End-to-End LLM-GNN Soft Prompt Framework for Fraud Detection27 May 2026
- 2026L2IR: Revealing Latent Intent in Graph Fraud Detection25 May 2026
- 2026Beyond the Aggregation Dilemma: Prior-Retaining Decoupled Learning for Multimodal Graphs23 May 2026
- 2026CAMERA: Adapting to Semantic Camouflage in Unsupervised Text-Attributed Graph Fraud Detection19 May 2026
- 2026LLM+Graph@VLDB'2025 Workshop Summary3 Apr 2026
- 2025Human-Centered LLM-Agent System for Detecting Anomalous Digital Asset Transactions23 Oct 2025
- 2025SHERLOCK: Towards Dynamic Knowledge Adaptation in LLM-enhanced E-commerce Risk Management10 Oct 2025