mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

DGP: A Dual-Granularity Prompting Framework for Fraud Detection with Graph-Enhanced LLMs

arXiv 2507.21653 ↗First posted 29 Jul 2025cs.LG cs.AIcited by 12

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Real-world fraud detection applications benefit from graph learning techniques that jointly exploit node features, often rich in textual data, and graph structural information. Recently, Graph-Enhanced LLMs emerge as a promising graph learning approach that converts graph information into prompts, exploiting LLMs' ability to reason over both textual and structural information. Among them, text-only prompting, which converts graph information to prompts consisting solely of text tokens, offers a solution that relies only on LLM tuning without requiring additional graph-specific encoders. However, text-only prompting struggles on heterogeneous fraud-detection graphs: multi-hop relations expand exponentially with each additional hop, leading to rapidly growing neighborhoods associated with dense textual information. These neighborhoods may overwhelm the model with long, irrelevant content in the prompt and suppress key signals from the target node, thereby degrading performance. To address this challenge, we propose Dual Granularity Prompting (DGP), which mitigates information overload by preserving fine-grained textual details for the target node while summarizing neighbor information into coarse-grained text prompts. DGP introduces tailored summarization strategies for different data modalities, bi-level semantic abstraction for textual fields and statistical aggregation for numerical features, enabling effective compression of verbose neighbor content into concise, informative prompts. Experiments across public and industrial datasets demonstrate that DGP operates within a manageable token budget while improving fraud detection performance by up to 6.8% (AUPRC) over state-of-the-art methods, showing the potential of Graph-Enhanced LLMs for fraud detection.

Key facts. Cited by 12 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 16 of its 35 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 29 Jul 2025.

Builds on

16 of 35 references.

References · 16

  1. 2017Attention Is All You Needcited by 60,361
  2. 2016Semi-Supervised Classification with Graph Convolutional Networkscited by 11,361
  3. 2017Graph Attention Networkscited by 8,923
  4. 2017Inductive Representation Learning on Large Graphscited by 6,320
  5. 2023Lost in the Middle: How Language Models Use Long Contextscited by 3,455
  6. 2020Heterogeneous Graph Transformercited by 582
  7. 2020Enhancing Graph Neural Network-based Fraud Detectors against Camouflaged Fraudsterscited by 250
  8. 2023Language is All a Graph Needscited by 220
  9. 2013From Amateurs to Connoisseurs: Modeling the Evolution of User Expertise through Online Reviewscited by 108
  10. 2024Transformers need glasses! Information over-squashing in language taskscited by 91
  11. 2024Partitioning Message Passing for Graph Fraud Detectioncited by 23
  12. 2025LLM as GNN: Graph Vocabulary Learning for Text-Attributed Graph Foundation Modelscited by 22
4 more
  1. 2025Long-Context Generalization with Sparse Attentioncited by 21
  2. 2023Revisiting Graph-Based Fraud Detection in Sight of Heterophily and Spectrumcited by 20
  3. 2023Efficient Heterogeneous Graph Learning via Random Projectioncited by 16
  4. 2018NHAD: Neuro-Fuzzy Based Horizontal Anomaly Detection In Online Social Networkscited by 4

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2025: 2; 2026: 10.

12 papers.