FRACTION: Fraud Explanation Generation via Agentic Graph Context Navigation
On the map: LLM agents and tool use → Web, search, and research agents
Abstract (arXiv)
Graph fraud explanation generation emerges as an important task, which requires jointly leveraging graph structure and content information to produce human-readable explanations for a given risk label. An intuitive approach is to adapt existing graph-enhanced large language models (LLMs), which inject graph structure into LLMs via graph-conditioned instruction tuning or structure-aware embeddings. However, existing methods face two key challenges in graph fraud explanation generation: a lack of evaluation protocols tailored to explanation quality, and a mismatch between the granularity of graph information they provide and what explanation generation requires. In this paper, we propose FRaud Explanation Generation via Agentic Graph Context NavigaTION (FRACTION), a framework for graph fraud explanation generation. To evaluate explanation quality, we introduce a task-specific rubric that assesses faithfulness, graph grounding, helpfulness, consistency, and conciseness, and validate it against human judgments. To focus on fine-grained details of relevant neighbors without reading the entire neighborhood, we equip a language model with graph tools that progressively disclose neighbor records. To train our graph agent, we propose a rubric-guided trajectory distillation strategy through which the agent learns both tool-use behavior and structured explanation generation. Experimental results on three fraud datasets demonstrate consistent improvements over state-of-the-art baselines under a human-aligned rubric.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Placed in Web, search, and research agents, one of 16 directions in LLM agents and tool use. Builds on 12 of its 25 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 13 Oct 2026.
Builds on
12 of 25 references.
References · 12
- 2026DeepSeek-V4: Towards Highly Efficient Million-Token Context Intelligencecited by 1,040
- 2023Language is All a Graph Needscited by 220
- 2024LLaGA: Large Language and Graph Assistantcited by 181
- 2020A Semi-supervised Graph Attentive Network for Financial Fraud Detectioncited by 151
- 2023GraphText: Graph Reasoning in Text Spacecited by 111
- 2015Inferring Networks of Substitutable and Complementary Productscited by 92
- 2024Graph Neural Networks for Financial Fraud Detection: A Reviewcited by 25
- 2024Partitioning Message Passing for Graph Fraud Detectioncited by 23
- 2025DGP: A Dual-Granularity Prompting Framework for Fraud Detection with Graph-Enhanced LLMscited by 12
- 2025Self-Critique and Refinement for Faithful Natural Language Explanationscited by 10
- 2025A Necessary Step toward Faithfulness: Measuring and Improving Consistency in Free-Text Explanationscited by 3
- 2019Quick survey of graph-based fraud detection methodscited by 1
Built on by
Not cited yet.
Similar, not cited
Close in wording, no citation either way
- 2026Autonomous Chain-of-Thought Distillation for Graph-Based Fraud Detection
- 2026VeriGraph: Towards Verifiable Data-Analytic Agents
- 2025Actions Speak Louder than Prompts: A Large-Scale Study of LLMs for Graph Inference
- 2026Rethinking Fraud Safety Evaluation: Multi-Round Attacks Reveal Safety-Utility Tradeoffs in Graph-Context LLM Defenders ↗
- 2026Grounded but Misleading: Evaluating Semantic Alignment in AI-Generated Security Explanations
- 2026A Graph-Enhanced Defense Framework for Explainable Fake News Detection with LLM
- 2026Toward Auditable Fraud Detection: Combining Graph Features, Model Explanations, and Agentic Case Investigation
- 2026Beyond Verdicts: A Graph-Based Analysis of Human and LLM Reasoning in Scientific Fact-Checking