mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

The Value of Gen-AI Conversations: A bottom-up Framework for AI Value Alignment

arXiv 2507.21091 ↗First posted 26 Jun 2025cs.CY cs.AIcited by 0

On the map: LLM alignment / RLHF / preference optimisation → Human values and AI feedback alignment

Abstract (arXiv)

Conversational agents (CAs) based on generative artificial intelligence frequently face challenges ensuring ethical interactions that align with human values. Current value alignment efforts largely rely on top-down approaches, such as technical guidelines or legal value principles. However, these methods tend to be disconnected from the specific contexts in which CAs operate, potentially leading to misalignment with users interests. To address this challenge, we propose a novel, bottom-up approach to value alignment, utilizing the value ontology of the ISO Value-Based Engineering standard for ethical IT design. We analyse 593 ethically sensitive system outputs identified from 16,908 conversational logs of a major European employment service CA to identify core values and instances of value misalignment within real-world interactions. The results revealed nine core values and 32 different value misalignments that negatively impacted users. Our findings provide actionable insights for CA providers seeking to address ethical challenges and achieve more context-sensitive value alignment.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Placed in Human values and AI feedback alignment, one of 10 directions in LLM alignment / RLHF / preference optimisation. Builds on 10 of its 47 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 26 Jun 2025.

Builds on

10 of 47 references.

Closest ancestors · 2

Same direction, newest first

  1. 2022Constitutional AI: Harmlessness from AI Feedback15 Dec
  2. 2022In conversation with Artificial Intelligence: aligning language models with human values1 Sep

Other references · 8

  1. 2023The Rise and Potential of Large Language Model Based Agents: A Surveycited by 1,422
  2. 2020Artificial Intelligence, Values and Alignmentcited by 443
  3. 2019The Ethics of AI Ethics -- An Evaluation of Guidelinescited by 129
  4. 2019What Makes a Good Conversation? Challenges in Designing Truly Conversational Agentscited by 42
  5. 2021The Challenge of Value Alignment: from Fairer Algorithms to AI Safetycited by 34
  6. 2023`It is currently hodgepodge'': Examining AI/ML Practitioners' Challenges during Co-production of Responsible AI Valuescited by 18
  7. 2023Indian-BhED: A Dataset for Measuring India-Centric Biases in Large Language Modelscited by 17
  8. 2024Should agentic conversational AI change how we think about ethics? Characterising an interactional ethics centred on respectcited by 8

Built on by

Not cited yet.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2024ValueCompass: A Framework for Measuring Contextual Value Alignment Between Human and LLMs
  2. 2026Toward a Theory of Value in AI Alignment
  3. 2025Multi-level Value Alignment in Agentic AI Systems: Survey and Perspectives
  4. 2024Democratizing Reward Design for Personal and Representative Value-Alignment
  5. 2023A Multi-Level Framework for the AI Alignment Problem
  6. 2025Diverse Human Value Alignment for Large Language Models via Ethical Reasoning
  7. 2023The Value-Sensitive Conversational Agent Co-Design Framework
  8. 2024Contextual Moral Value Alignment Through Context-Based Aggregation