mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

SLoW: Select Low-frequency Words! Automatic Dictionary Selection for Translation on Large Language Models

arXiv 2507.18902 ↗First posted 25 Jul 2025cs.CLcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

There are more than 7,000 languages around the world, and current Large Language Models (LLMs) only support hundreds of languages. Dictionary-based prompting methods can enhance translation on them, but most methods use all the available dictionaries, which could be expensive. Instead, it will be flexible to have a trade-off between token consumption and translation performance. This paper proposes a novel task called Automatic Dictionary Selection (ADS). The goal of the task is to automatically select which dictionary to use to enhance translation. We propose a novel and effective method which we call Select Low-frequency Words! (SLoW) which selects those dictionaries that have a lower frequency. Our methods have unique advantages. First, there is no need for access to the training data for frequency estimation (which is usually unavailable). Second, it inherits the advantage of dictionary-based methods, where no additional tuning is required on LLMs. Experimental results on 100 languages from FLORES indicate that SLoW surpasses strong baselines, and it can obviously save token usage, with many languages even surpassing the translation performance of the full dictionary baseline.footnoteA shocking fact is that there is no need to use the actual training data (often unobtainable) for frequency estimation, and an estimation frequency obtained using public resources is still apparently effective in improving translation with ChatGPT and Llama, and DeepSeek.footnoteCode and data available upon publication.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 23 of its 43 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 25 Jul 2025.

Builds on

23 of 43 references.

References · 23

  1. 2020Language Models are Few-Shot Learnerscited by 32,419
  2. 2022OPT: Open Pre-trained Transformer Language Modelscited by 3,512
  3. 2014Sequence to Sequence Learning with Neural Networkscited by 2,986
  4. 2022BLOOM: A 176B-Parameter Open-Access Multilingual Language Modelcited by 1,984
  5. 2020COMET: A Neural Framework for MT Evaluationcited by 1,033
  6. 2023Large Language Models Can Be Easily Distracted by Irrelevant Contextcited by 841
  7. 2020The State and Fate of Linguistic Diversity and Inclusion in the NLP Worldcited by 798
  8. 2015Improving Neural Machine Translation Models with Monolingual Datacited by 788
  9. 2021Prompt Programming for Large Language Models: Beyond the Few-Shot Paradigmcited by 606
  10. 2023Is ChatGPT a Good NLG Evaluator? A Preliminary Studycited by 422
  11. 2017Lexically Constrained Decoding for Sequence Generation Using Grid Beam Searchcited by 237
  12. 2022Towards Understanding Chain-of-Thought Prompting: An Empirical Study of What Matterscited by 222
11 more
  1. 2018Fast Lexically Constrained Decoding with Dynamic Beam Allocation for Neural Machine Translationcited by 182
  2. 2022In-context Examples Selection for Machine Translationcited by 172
  3. 2023Self-Edit: Fault-Aware Code Editor for Code Generationcited by 111
  4. 2019Training Neural Machine Translation To Apply Terminology Constraintscited by 73
  5. 2023CodeIE: Large Code Generation Models are Better Few-Shot Information Extractorscited by 68
  6. 2019Code-Switching for Enhancing NMT with Pre-Specified Translationcited by 53
  7. 2016Incorporating Discrete Translation Lexicons into Neural Machine Translationcited by 33
  8. 2022Using natural language prompts for machine translationcited by 27
  9. 2016Bridging Neural Machine Translation and Bilingual Dictionariescited by 18
  10. 2022PCC: Paraphrasing with Bottom-k Sampling and Cyclic Learning for Curriculum Data Augmentationcited by 14
  11. 2023Not All Metrics Are Guilty: Improving NLG Evaluation by Diversifying Referencescited by 11

Built on by

Not cited yet.