ShrinkBox: Backdoor Attack on Object Detection to Disrupt Collision Avoidance in Machine Learning-based Advanced Driver Assistance Systems
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Advanced Driver Assistance Systems (ADAS) significantly enhance road safety by detecting potential collisions and alerting drivers. However, their reliance on expensive sensor technologies such as LiDAR and radar limits accessibility, particularly in low- and middle-income countries. Machine learning-based ADAS (ML-ADAS), leveraging deep neural networks (DNNs) with only standard camera input, offers a cost-effective alternative. Critical to ML-ADAS is the collision avoidance feature, which requires the ability to detect objects and estimate their distances accurately. This is achieved with specialized DNNs like YOLO, which provides real-time object detection, and a lightweight, detection-wise distance estimation approach that relies on key features extracted from the detections like bounding box dimensions and size. However, the robustness of these systems is undermined by security vulnerabilities in object detectors. In this paper, we introduce ShrinkBox, a novel backdoor attack targeting object detection in collision avoidance ML-ADAS. Unlike existing attacks that manipulate object class labels or presence, ShrinkBox subtly shrinks ground truth bounding boxes. This attack remains undetected in dataset inspections and standard benchmarks while severely disrupting downstream distance estimation. We demonstrate that ShrinkBox can be realized in the YOLOv9m object detector at an Attack Success Rate (ASR) of 96%, with only a 4% poisoning ratio in the training instances of the KITTI dataset. Furthermore, given the low error targets introduced in our relaxed poisoning strategy, we find that ShrinkBox increases the Mean Absolute Error (MAE) in downstream distance estimation by more than 3x on poisoned samples, potentially resulting in delays or prevention of collision warnings altogether.
Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 12 of its 19 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 22 Jul 2025.
Builds on
12 of 19 references.
References · 12
- 2018YOLOv3: An Incremental Improvementcited by 2,659
- 2017Targeted Backdoor Attacks on Deep Learning Systems Using Data Poisoningcited by 1,055
- 2022YOLOv7: Trainable bag-of-freebies sets new state-of-the-art for real-time object detectorscited by 982
- 2018Deep Ordinal Regression Network for Monocular Depth Estimationcited by 723
- 2019Object Detection in 20 Years: A Surveycited by 531
- 2024YOLOv10: Real-Time End-to-End Object Detectioncited by 515
- 2020Backdoor Learning: A Surveycited by 426
- 2024YOLOv9: Learning What You Want to Learn Using Programmable Gradient Informationcited by 425
- 2018High Quality Monocular Depth Estimation via Transfer Learningcited by 133
- 2020Backdoor Attacks and Countermeasures on Deep Learning: A Comprehensive Reviewcited by 123
- 2022BadDet: Backdoor Attacks on Object Detectioncited by 45
- 2024DECADE: Towards Designing Efficient-yet-Accurate Distance Estimation Modules for Collision Avoidance in Mobile Advanced Driver Assistance Systemscited by 2
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2026: 1.
1 paper.
Similar, not cited
Close in wording, no citation either way
- 2023Attacking by Aligning: Clean-Label Backdoor Attacks on Object Detection
- 2024Mask-based Invisible Backdoor Attacks on Object Detection
- 2026Safety-Aligned 3D Object Detection: Single-Vehicle, Cooperative, and End-to-End Perspectives
- 2024A Survey and Evaluation of Adversarial Attacks for Object Detection
- 2022Backdoor Mitigation in Deep Neural Networks via Strategic Retraining
- 2023AGNES: Abstraction-guided Framework for Deep Neural Networks Security
- 2026AdROD: HyperNetwork-based Adversarially Robust Object Detection for Autonomous Driving
- 2022Physical Backdoor Attacks to Lane Detection Systems in Autonomous Driving