mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Comparative validation of surgical phase recognition, instrument keypoint estimation, and instrument instance segmentation in endoscopy: Results of the PhaKIR 2024 challenge

arXiv 2507.16559 ↗First posted 22 Jul 2025cs.CVcited by 8

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Reliable recognition and localization of surgical instruments in endoscopic video recordings are foundational for a wide range of applications in computer- and robot-assisted minimally invasive surgery (RAMIS), including surgical training, skill assessment, and autonomous assistance. However, robust performance under real-world conditions remains a significant challenge. Incorporating surgical context - such as the current procedural phase - has emerged as a promising strategy to improve robustness and interpretability. To address these challenges, we organized the Surgical Procedure Phase, Keypoint, and Instrument Recognition (PhaKIR) sub-challenge as part of the Endoscopic Vision (EndoVis) challenge at MICCAI 2024. We introduced a novel, multi-center dataset comprising thirteen full-length laparoscopic cholecystectomy videos collected from three distinct medical institutions, with unified annotations for three interrelated tasks: surgical phase recognition, instrument keypoint estimation, and instrument instance segmentation. Unlike existing datasets, ours enables joint investigation of instrument localization and procedural context within the same data while supporting the integration of temporal information across entire procedures. We report results and findings in accordance with the BIAS guidelines for biomedical image analysis challenges. The PhaKIR sub-challenge advances the field by providing a unique benchmark for developing temporally aware, context-driven methods in RAMIS and offers a high-quality resource to support future research in surgical scene understanding.

Key facts. Cited by 8 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 66 of its 103 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 22 Jul 2025.

Builds on

66 of 103 references.

References · 66

  1. 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 52,096
  2. 2018BERT: Pre-training of Deep Bidirectional Transformers for Language Understandingcited by 40,399
  3. 2014Adam: A Method for Stochastic Optimizationcited by 37,240
  4. 2021Learning Transferable Visual Models From Natural Language Supervisioncited by 33,744
  5. 2020An Image is Worth 16x16 Words: Transformers for Image Recognition at Scalecited by 30,186
  6. 2015U-Net: Convolutional Networks for Biomedical Image Segmentationcited by 19,713
  7. 2014Microsoft COCO: Common Objects in Contextcited by 17,608
  8. 2021Swin Transformer: Hierarchical Vision Transformer using Shifted Windowscited by 12,139
  9. 2020A Simple Framework for Contrastive Learning of Visual Representationscited by 12,049
  10. 2014ImageNet Large Scale Visual Recognition Challengecited by 8,498
  11. 2023Segment Anythingcited by 8,234
  12. 2019Momentum Contrast for Unsupervised Visual Representation Learningcited by 7,513
38 more
  1. 2020End-to-End Object Detection with Transformerscited by 7,414
  2. 2017Mask R-CNNcited by 7,277
  3. 2017mixup: Beyond Empirical Risk Minimizationcited by 5,183
  4. 2016SGDR: Stochastic Gradient Descent with Warm Restartscited by 5,045
  5. 2022A ConvNet for the 2020scited by 3,579
  6. 2024SAM 2: Segment Anything in Images and Videoscited by 2,863
  7. 2021Masked-attention Mask Transformer for Universal Image Segmentationcited by 2,351
  8. 2019RandAugment: Practical automated data augmentation with a reduced search spacecited by 2,269
  9. 2017The Kinetics Human Action Video Datasetcited by 1,909
  10. 2018Spectral Normalization for Generative Adversarial Networkscited by 1,636
  11. 2020YOLOv4: Optimal Speed and Accuracy of Object Detectioncited by 1,630
  12. 2021Is Space-Time Attention All You Need for Video Understanding?cited by 1,620
  13. 2017Random Erasing Data Augmentationcited by 1,239
  14. 2024Vision Mamba: Efficient Visual Representation Learning with Bidirectional State Space Modelcited by 1,056
  15. 2015Aligning Books and Movies: Towards Story-like Visual Explanations by Watching Movies and Reading Bookscited by 1,043
  16. 2021Multiscale Vision Transformerscited by 897
  17. 2020Simple Copy-Paste is a Strong Data Augmentation Method for Instance Segmentationcited by 596
  18. 2023EVA-02: A Visual Representation for Neon Genesiscited by 381
  19. 2014Deeply-Supervised Netscited by 367
  20. 2016EndoNet: A Deep Architecture for Recognition Tasks on Laparoscopic Videoscited by 367
  21. 2021Deep Deterministic Uncertainty: A Simple Baselinecited by 200
  22. 2022Metrics reloaded: Recommendations for image analysis validationcited by 195
  23. 2022RTMDet: An Empirical Study of Designing Real-Time Object Detectorscited by 195
  24. 20192017 Robotic Instrument Segmentation Challengecited by 168
  25. 2021ASFormer: Transformer for Action Segmentationcited by 168
  26. 2020TeCNO: Surgical Phase Recognition with Multi-Stage Temporal Convolutional Networkscited by 141
  27. 2022MetaFormer Baselines for Visioncited by 132
  28. 20202018 Robotic Scene Segmentation Challengecited by 124
  29. 2024Video Mamba Suite: State Space Model as a Versatile Alternative for Video Understandingcited by 108
  30. 2023SurgicalSAM: Efficient Class Promptable Surgical Instrument Segmentationcited by 104
  31. 2021Trans-SVNet: Accurate Phase Recognition from Surgical Videos via Hybrid Embedding Aggregation Transformercited by 94
  32. 2020The Real-World-Weight Cross-Entropy Loss Function: Modeling the Costs of Mislabelingcited by 64
  33. 2021On the Practicality of Deterministic Epistemic Uncertaintycited by 62
  34. 2019Methods and open-source toolkit for analyzing and visualizing challenge resultscited by 60
  35. 2021Comparative Validation of Machine Learning Algorithms for Surgical Workflow and Skill Analysis with the HeiChole Benchmarkcited by 60
  36. 2022Towards a Guideline for Evaluation Metrics in Medical Image Segmentationcited by 60
  37. 2023Understanding metric-related pitfalls in image analysis validationcited by 58
  38. 2019BIAS: Transparent reporting of biomedical image analysis challengescited by 57

50 most cited of 66 All 66 (JSON)

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2025: 4; 2026: 4.

8 papers.