mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Benchmarking LLM Privacy Recognition for Social Robot Decision Making

arXiv 2507.16124 ↗First posted 22 Jul 2025cs.RO cs.AIcited by 3

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

While robots have previously utilized rule-based systems or probabilistic models for user interaction, the rapid evolution of large language models (LLMs) presents new opportunities to develop LLM-powered robots for enhanced human-robot interaction (HRI). To fully realize these capabilities, however, robots need to collect data such as audio, fine-grained images, video, and locations. As a result, LLMs often process sensitive personal information, particularly within private environments, such as homes. Given the tension between utility and privacy risks, evaluating how current LLMs manage sensitive data is critical. Specifically, we aim to explore the extent to which out-of-the-box LLMs are privacy-aware in the context of household robots. In this work, we present a set of privacy-relevant scenarios developed using the Contextual Integrity (CI) framework. We first surveyed users' privacy preferences regarding in-home robot behaviors and then examined how their privacy orientations affected their choices of these behaviors (N = 450). We then provided the same set of scenarios and questions to state-of-the-art LLMs (N = 10) and found that the agreement between humans and LLMs was generally low. To further investigate the capabilities of LLMs as potential privacy controllers, we implemented four additional prompting strategies and compared their results. We discuss the performance of the evaluated models as well as the implications and potential of AI privacy awareness in human-robot interaction.

Key facts. Cited by 3 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 39 of its 116 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 22 Jul 2025.

Builds on

39 of 116 references.

References · 39

  1. 2017Attention Is All You Needcited by 59,932
  2. 2020Language Models are Few-Shot Learnerscited by 32,199
  3. 2023Judging LLM-as-a-Judge with MT-Bench and Chatbot Arenacited by 8,393
  4. 2025Qwen3 Technical Reportcited by 8,195
  5. 2021Evaluating Large Language Models Trained on Codecited by 8,053
  6. 2023Reflexion: Language Agents with Verbal Reinforcement Learningcited by 4,064
  7. 2021Program Synthesis with Large Language Modelscited by 3,509
  8. 2023RT-2: Vision-Language-Action Models Transfer Web Knowledge to Robotic Controlcited by 2,993
  9. 2022Do As I Can, Not As I Say: Grounding Language in Robotic Affordancescited by 2,302
  10. 2022Beyond the Imitation Game: Quantifying and extrapolating the capabilities of language modelscited by 1,970
  11. 2023Not what you've signed up for: Compromising Real-World LLM-Integrated Applications with Indirect Prompt Injectioncited by 1,339
  12. 2025GR00T N1: An Open Foundation Model for Generalist Humanoid Robotscited by 1,167
27 more
  1. 2024Length-Controlled AlpacaEval: A Simple Way to Debias Automatic Evaluatorscited by 865
  2. 2020XTREME: A Massively Multilingual Multi-task Benchmark for Evaluating Cross-lingual Generalizationcited by 738
  3. 2023Identifying the Risks of LM Agents with an LM-Emulated Sandboxcited by 514
  4. 2024R-Judge: Benchmarking Safety Risk Awareness for LLM Agentscited by 268
  5. 2023Membership Inference Attacks against Language Models via Neighbourhood Comparisoncited by 249
  6. 2023Can LLMs Keep a Secret? Testing Privacy Implications of Language Models via Contextual Integrity Theorycited by 218
  7. 2023Beyond Memorization: Violating Privacy Via Inference with Large Language Modelscited by 167
  8. 2023Large Language Models for Robotics: A Surveycited by 132
  9. 2023Practical Membership Inference Attacks against Fine-tuned Large Language Models via Self-prompt Calibrationcited by 90
  10. 2024AirGapAgent: Protecting Privacy-Conscious Conversational Agentscited by 90
  11. 2023Red teaming ChatGPT via Jailbreaking: Bias, Robustness, Reliability and Toxicitycited by 86
  12. 2025AgentDAM: Privacy Leakage Evaluation for Autonomous Web Agentscited by 79
  13. 2019Question Answering for Privacy Policies: Combining Computational and Legal Perspectivescited by 65
  14. 2023LLM as A Robotic Brain: Unifying Egocentric Memory and Controlcited by 32
  15. 2020PolicyQA: A Reading Comprehension Dataset for Privacy Policiescited by 31
  16. 2020Privacy Policies over Time: Curation and Analysis of a Million-Document Datasetcited by 28
  17. 2024LLM-Driven Robots Risk Enacting Discrimination, Violence, and Unlawful Actionscited by 21
  18. 2018Discovering Smart Home Internet of Things Privacy Norms Using Contextual Integritycited by 10
  19. 2023GenAIPABench: A Benchmark for Generative AI-based Privacy Assistantscited by 7
  20. 2022PLUE: Language Understanding Evaluation Benchmark for Privacy Policies in Englishcited by 5
  21. 2025Keep Security! Benchmarking Security Policy Preservation in Large Language Model Contexts Against Indirect Attacks in Question Answeringcited by 5
  22. 2018Privacy attitudes and concerns in the digital lives of older adults: Westin's privacy attitude typology revisitedcited by 4
  23. 2025VLM-driven Behavior Tree for Context-aware Task Planningcited by 3
  24. 2023Robots as AI Double Agents: Privacy in Motion Planningcited by 2
  25. 2024Towards an LLM-Based Speech Interface for Robot-Assisted Feedingcited by 2
  26. 2022CONFIDANT: A Privacy Controller for Social Robotscited by 1
  27. 2024Toward LLM-Powered Social Robots for Supporting Sensitive Disclosures of Stigmatized Health Conditionscited by 1

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2025: 1; 2026: 2.

3 papers.