The Other Mind: How Language Models Exhibit Human Temporal Cognition
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
As Large Language Models (LLMs) continue to advance, they exhibit certain cognitive patterns similar to those of humans that are not directly specified in training data. This study investigates this phenomenon by focusing on temporal cognition in LLMs. Leveraging the similarity judgment task, we find that larger models spontaneously establish a subjective temporal reference point and adhere to the Weber-Fechner law, whereby the perceived distance logarithmically compresses as years recede from this reference point. To uncover the mechanisms behind this behavior, we conducted multiple analyses across neuronal, representational, and informational levels. We first identify a set of temporal-preferential neurons and find that this group exhibits minimal activation at the subjective reference point and implements a logarithmic coding scheme convergently found in biological systems. Probing representations of years reveals a hierarchical construction process, where years evolve from basic numerical values in shallow layers to abstract temporal orientation in deep layers. Finally, using pre-trained embedding models, we found that the training corpus itself possesses an inherent, non-linear temporal structure, which provides the raw material for the model's internal construction. In discussion, we propose an experientialist perspective for understanding these findings, where the LLMs' cognition is viewed as a subjective construction of the external world by its internal representational system. This nuanced perspective implies the potential emergence of alien cognitive frameworks that humans cannot intuitively predict, pointing toward a direction for AI alignment that focuses on guiding internal constructions. Our code is available at https://TheOtherMind.github.io.
Key facts. Cited by 5 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 24 of its 59 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 21 Jul 2025.
Builds on
24 of 59 references.
References · 24
- 2022Training language models to follow instructions with human feedbackcited by 15,971
- 2023Sparse Autoencoders Find Highly Interpretable Features in Language Modelscited by 1,420
- 2023Representation Engineering: A Top-Down Approach to AI Transparencycited by 1,336
- 2022Using cognitive psychology to understand GPT-3cited by 398
- 2022PlanBench: An Extensible Benchmark for Evaluating Large Language Models on Planning and Reasoning about Changecited by 382
- 2025The Illusion of Thinking: Understanding the Strengths and Limitations of Reasoning Models via the Lens of Problem Complexitycited by 302
- 2024Mind Your Step (by Step): Chain-of-Thought can Reduce Performance on Tasks where Thinking Makes Humans Worsecited by 109
- 2025H-CoT: Hijacking the Chain-of-Thought Safety Reasoning Mechanism to Jailbreak Large Reasoning Models, Including OpenAI o1/o3, DeepSeek-R1, and Gemini 2.0 Flash Thinkingcited by 99
- 2024Towards Guaranteed Safe AI: A Framework for Ensuring Robust and Reliable AI Systemscited by 96
- 2025Gemini Embedding: Generalizable Embeddings from Geminicited by 94
- 2023A Theory of Emergent In-Context Learning as Implicit Structure Inductioncited by 86
- 2025Superintelligent Agents Pose Catastrophic Risks: Can Scientist AI Offer a Safer Path?cited by 75
12 more
- 2023Could a Large Language Model be Conscious?cited by 73
- 2023Can Large Language Models Understand Real-World Complex Instructions?cited by 69
- 2023Instructed to Bias: Instruction-Tuned Language Models Exhibit Emergent Cognitive Biascited by 53
- 2024Shall We Team Up: Exploring Spontaneous Cooperation of Competing LLM Agentscited by 48
- 2025Large Language Models Pass the Turing Testcited by 48
- 2023Do Large Language Models Show Decision Heuristics Similar to Humans? A Case Study Using GPT-3.5cited by 42
- 2025From Tokens to Thoughts: How LLMs and Humans Trade Compression for Meaningcited by 25
- 2024Eliciting the Priors of Large Language Models using Iterated In-Context Learningcited by 19
- 2025What is a Number, That a Large Language Model May Know It?cited by 15
- 2025Levels of Analysis for Large Language Modelscited by 10
- 2025Revealing emergent human-like conceptual representations from language predictioncited by 6
- 2023Return to Lacan: an approach to digital twin mind with free energy principlecited by 2
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2025: 1; 2026: 4.
5 papers.
- 2026Time Travel Engine: A Shared Latent Chronological Manifold Enables Historical Navigation in Large Language Modelscited by 2
- 2025Structured yet Bounded Temporal Understanding in Large Language Modelscited by 0
- 2026Mechanistic Origin of Moral Indifference in Language Modelscited by 0
- 2026Temporal Preference Concepts and their Functions in a Large Language Modelcited by 0
- 2026Representational alignment yields generalizable safety in language modelscited by 0
- 2026Representational alignment yields generalizable safety in language models3 Sep 2026
- 2026Temporal Preference Concepts and their Functions in a Large Language Model11 May 2026
- 2026Mechanistic Origin of Moral Indifference in Language Models16 Mar 2026
- 2026Time Travel Engine: A Shared Latent Chronological Manifold Enables Historical Navigation in Large Language Models10 Jan 2026
- 2025Structured yet Bounded Temporal Understanding in Large Language Models19 Oct 2025