Efficient Visual Appearance Optimization by Learning from Prior Preferences
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Adjusting visual parameters such as brightness and contrast is common in our everyday experiences. Finding the optimal parameter setting is challenging due to the large search space and the lack of an explicit objective function, leaving users to rely solely on their implicit preferences. Prior work has explored Preferential Bayesian Optimization (PBO) to address this challenge, involving users to iteratively select preferred designs from candidate sets. However, PBO often requires many rounds of preference comparisons, making it more suitable for designers than everyday end-users. We propose Meta-PO, a novel method that integrates PBO with meta-learning to improve sample efficiency. Specifically, Meta-PO infers prior users' preferences and stores them as models, which are leveraged to intelligently suggest design candidates for the new users, enabling faster convergence and more personalized results. An experimental evaluation of our method for appearance design tasks on 2D and 3D content showed that participants achieved satisfactory appearance in 5.86 iterations using Meta-PO when participants shared similar goals with a population (e.g., tuning for a ``warm'' look) and in 8 iterations even generalizes across divergent goals (e.g., from ``vintage'', ``warm'', to ``holiday''). Meta-PO makes personalized visual optimization more applicable to end-users through a generalizable, more efficient optimization conditioned on preferences, with the potential to scale interface personalization more broadly.
Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 23 of its 76 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 21 Jul 2025.
Builds on
23 of 76 references.
References · 23
- 2017Model-Agnostic Meta-Learning for Fast Adaptation of Deep Networkscited by 4,897
- 2018A Tutorial on Bayesian Optimizationcited by 744
- 2016RL2: Fast Reinforcement Learning via Slow Reinforcement Learningcited by 503
- 2022Recent Advances in Bayesian Optimizationcited by 76
- 2017Preferential Bayesian Optimizationcited by 74
- 2021Few-Shot Bayesian Optimization with Deep Kernel Surrogatescited by 71
- 2019Meta-Learning Acquisition Functions for Transfer Learning in Bayesian Optimizationcited by 70
- 2016Image Aesthetic Assessment: An Experimental Surveycited by 50
- 2020Meta-learning in natural and artificial intelligencecited by 39
- 2023Compress, Then Prompt: Improving Accuracy-Efficiency Trade-off of LLM Inference with Transferable Promptcited by 28
- 2023Transfer Learning for Bayesian Optimization: A Surveycited by 27
- 2020Sequential Gallery for Interactive Visual Design Optimizationcited by 25
11 more
- 2021Reinforced Few-Shot Acquisition Function Learning for Bayesian Optimizationcited by 23
- 2024SituationAdapt: Contextual UI Optimization in Mixed Reality with Situation Awareness via LLM Reasoningcited by 8
- 2022TransBO: Hyperparameter Optimization via Two-Phase Transfer Learningcited by 7
- 2025FontCraft: Multimodal Font Design Using Interactive Bayesian Optimizationcited by 7
- 2022Investigating Positive and Negative Qualities of Human-in-the-Loop Optimization for Designing Interaction Techniquescited by 6
- 2025Fly Away: Evaluating the Impact of Motion Fidelity on Optimized User Interface Design via Bayesian Optimization in Automated Urban Air Mobility Simulationscited by 2
- 2025Continual Human-in-the-Loop Optimizationcited by 2
- 2014Analyzing User Activities, Demographics, Social Network Structure and User-Generated Content on Instagramcited by 1
- 2020Button Simulation and Design via FDVV Modelscited by 1
- 2025Improving External Communication of Automated Vehicles Using Bayesian Optimizationcited by 1
- 2025Constrained Preferential Bayesian Optimization and Its Application in Banner Ad Designcited by 1
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2025: 2.
2 papers.