mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Byzantine-Robust Decentralized Coordination of LLM Agents

arXiv 2507.14928 ↗First posted 20 Jul 2025cs.DC cs.AIcited by 13

On the map: LLM agents and tool use → General LLM agent frameworks and benchmarks

Abstract (arXiv)

Collaboration among multiple large language model (LLM) agents is a promising approach to overcome inherent limitations of single-agent systems, such as hallucinations and single points of failure. As LLM agents are increasingly deployed on open blockchain platforms, multi-agent systems capable of tolerating malicious (Byzantine) agents have become essential. Recent Byzantine-robust multi-agent systems typically rely on leader-driven coordination, which suffers from two major drawbacks. First, they are inherently vulnerable to targeted attacks against the leader. If consecutive leaders behave maliciously, the system repeatedly fails to achieve consensus, forcing new consensus rounds, which is particularly costly given the high latency of LLM invocations. Second, an underperforming proposal from the leader can be accepted as the final answer even when higher-quality alternatives are available, as existing methods finalize the leader's proposal once it receives a quorum of votes. To address these issues, we propose DecentLLMs, a novel decentralized consensus approach for multi-agent LLM systems, where worker agents generate answers concurrently and evaluator agents independently score and rank these answers to select the best available one. This decentralized architecture enables faster consensus despite the presence of Byzantine agents and consistently selects higher-quality answers through Byzantine-robust aggregation techniques. Experimental results demonstrate that DecentLLMs effectively tolerates Byzantine agents and significantly improves the quality of selected answers.

Key facts. Cited by 13 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Placed in General LLM agent frameworks and benchmarks, one of 16 directions in LLM agents and tool use. Builds on 19 of its 35 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 20 Jul 2025.

Builds on

19 of 35 references.

Closest ancestors · 3

Same direction, newest first

  1. 2025Beyond Self-Talk: A Communication-Centric Survey of LLM-Based Multi-Agent Systems20 Feb
  2. 2024More Agents Is All You Need3 Feb
  3. 2024Large Language Model based Multi-Agents: A Survey of Progress and Challenges21 Jan

Other references · 16

  1. 2024MMLU-Pro: A More Robust and Challenging Multi-Task Language Understanding Benchmarkcited by 1,758
  2. 2023Improving Factuality and Reasoning in Language Models through Multiagent Debatecited by 1,739
  3. 2023A Survey on Hallucination in Large Language Models: Principles, Taxonomy, Challenges, and Open Questionscited by 1,582
  4. 2018The Hidden Vulnerability of Distributed Learning in Byzantiumcited by 324
  5. 2023Human-like Summarization Evaluation with ChatGPTcited by 126
  6. 2023Should we be going MAD? A Look at Multi-Agent Debate Strategies for LLMscited by 103
  7. 2023Examining Inter-Consistency of Large Language Models Collaboration: An In-depth Analysis via Debatecited by 94
  8. 2025A Survey on Trustworthy LLM Agents: Threats and Countermeasurescited by 93
  9. 2024DA-Code: Agent Data Science Code Generation Benchmark for Large Language Modelscited by 57
  10. 2025Sequential Diagnosis with Language Modelscited by 53
  11. 2024A Survey of Recent Backdoor Attacks and Defenses in Large Language Modelscited by 36
  12. 2025When One LLM Drools, Multi-LLM Collaboration Rulescited by 25
4 more
  1. 2023Blockchain Large Language Modelscited by 16
  2. 2025Enhancing LLM Performance Through Debate: An Empirical Study on Multi-Agent Debate for Coding Taskscited by 11
  3. 2025A Weighted Byzantine Fault Tolerance Consensus Driven Trusted Multiple Large Language Models Networkcited by 9
  4. 2021Narwhal and Tusk: A DAG-based Mempool and Efficient BFT Consensuscited by 4

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2026: 13.

13 papers.

Sort:

By area:

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2025Rethinking the Reliability of Multi-agent System: A Perspective from Byzantine Fault Tolerance
  2. 2025Towards Transparent and Incentive-Compatible Collaboration in Decentralized LLM Multi-Agent Systems: A Blockchain-Driven Approach
  3. 2025Decentralized Multi-Agent System with Trust-Aware Communication
  4. 2026Resilient Consensus in Agentic AI
  5. 2025A Trustworthy Multi-LLM Network: Challenges,Solutions, and A Use Case
  6. 2026SGTO-MAS: Secure Gorilla Troops Optimization for Multi-Agent LLM Systems
  7. 2024IBGP: Imperfect Byzantine Generals Problem for Zero-Shot Robustness in Communicative Multi-Agent Systems
  8. 2025Achieving Unanimous Consensus Through Multi-Agent Deliberation