A Weighted Byzantine Fault Tolerance Consensus Driven Trusted Multiple Large Language Models Network
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Large Language Models (LLMs) have achieved remarkable success across a wide range of applications. However, individual LLMs often produce inconsistent, biased, or hallucinated outputs due to limitations in their training corpora and model architectures. Recently, collaborative frameworks such as the Multi-LLM Network (MultiLLMN) have been introduced, enabling multiple LLMs to interact and jointly respond to user queries. Nevertheless, MultiLLMN architectures raise critical concerns regarding the reliability and security of the generated content, particularly in open environments where malicious or compromised LLMs may be present. Moreover, reliance on centralized coordination undermines system efficiency and introduces single points of failure. In this paper, we propose a novel Trusted MultiLLMN framework, driven by a Weighted Byzantine Fault Tolerance (WBFT) blockchain consensus mechanism, to ensure the reliability, security, and efficiency of multi-LLM collaboration. In WBFT, voting weights are adaptively assigned to each LLM based on its response quality and trustworthiness, incentivizing reliable behavior, and reducing the impact of malicious nodes. Extensive simulations demonstrate that WBFT significantly improves both consensus security and efficiency compared to classical and modern consensus mechanisms, particularly under wireless network conditions. Furthermore, our evaluations reveal that Trusted MultiLLMN supported by WBFT can deliver higher-quality and more credible responses than both single LLMs and conventional MultiLLMNs, thereby providing a promising path toward building robust, decentralized AI collaboration networks.
Key facts. Cited by 9 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 8 May 2025.
Builds on
No reference list yet.
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2025: 3; 2026: 6.
9 papers.
- 2025Free-MAD: Consensus-Free Multi-Agent Debatecited by 29
- 2025Byzantine-Robust Decentralized Coordination of LLM Agentscited by 14
- 2026Robust Multi-Agent LLMs under Byzantine Faultscited by 10
- 2025Belief-Calibrated Multi-Agent Consensus Seeking for Complex NLP Taskscited by 2
- 2026Blockchain Empowered Trustworthy Agent Networks: Foundations, Taxonomy, and Future Directionscited by 1
- 2026Blockchain-Enabled Routing for Zero-Trust Low-Altitude Intelligent Networkscited by 0
- 2026Multi-Agent Systems: From Classical Paradigms to Large Foundation Model-Enabled Futurescited by 0
- 2026Certifiable Semantic Agreement Among LLM Agents: What the Admissibility Instrument Decidescited by 0
- 2026Fully Byzantine-Resilient Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learningcited by 0
- 2026Fully Byzantine-Resilient Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learning22 Sep 2026
- 2026Blockchain Empowered Trustworthy Agent Networks: Foundations, Taxonomy, and Future Directions5 Aug 2026
- 2026Certifiable Semantic Agreement Among LLM Agents: What the Admissibility Instrument Decides5 Jun 2026
- 2026Robust Multi-Agent LLMs under Byzantine Faults9 May 2026
- 2026Multi-Agent Systems: From Classical Paradigms to Large Foundation Model-Enabled Futures20 Apr 2026
- 2026Blockchain-Enabled Routing for Zero-Trust Low-Altitude Intelligent Networks27 Feb 2026
- 2025Belief-Calibrated Multi-Agent Consensus Seeking for Complex NLP Tasks7 Oct 2025
- 2025Free-MAD: Consensus-Free Multi-Agent Debate14 Sep 2025
- 2025Byzantine-Robust Decentralized Coordination of LLM Agents20 Jul 2025