mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

LEAD: Exploring Logit Space Evolution for Model Selection

arXiv 2507.14559 ↗First posted 19 Jul 2025cs.CVcited by 3

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

The remarkable success of pretrain-then-finetune paradigm has led to a proliferation of available pre-trained models for vision tasks. This surge presents a significant challenge in efficiently choosing the most suitable pre-trained models for downstream tasks. The critical aspect of this challenge lies in effectively predicting the model transferability by considering the underlying fine-tuning dynamics. Existing methods often model fine-tuning dynamics in feature space with linear transformations, which do not precisely align with the fine-tuning objective and fail to grasp the essential nonlinearity from optimization. To this end, we present LEAD, a finetuning-aligned approach based on the network output of logits. LEAD proposes a theoretical framework to model the optimization process and derives an ordinary differential equation (ODE) to depict the nonlinear evolution toward the final logit state. Additionally, we design a class-aware decomposition method to consider the varying evolution dynamics across classes and further ensure practical applicability. Integrating the closely aligned optimization objective and nonlinear modeling capabilities derived from the differential equation, our method offers a concise solution to effectively bridge the optimization gap in a single step, bypassing the lengthy fine-tuning process. The comprehensive experiments on 24 supervised and self-supervised pre-trained models across 10 downstream datasets demonstrate impressive performances and showcase its broad adaptability even in low-data scenarios.

Key facts. Cited by 3 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 41 of its 56 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 19 Jul 2025.

Builds on

41 of 56 references.

References · 41

  1. 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 52,096
  2. 2020A Simple Framework for Contrastive Learning of Visual Representationscited by 12,049
  3. 2019Momentum Contrast for Unsupervised Visual Representation Learningcited by 7,513
  4. 2016Densely Connected Convolutional Networkscited by 6,720
  5. 2015Rethinking the Inception Architecture for Computer Visioncited by 5,475
  6. 2018MobileNetV2: Inverted Residuals and Linear Bottleneckscited by 4,795
  7. 2020Bootstrap your own latent: A new approach to self-supervised Learningcited by 4,750
  8. 2014Going Deeper with Convolutionscited by 4,241
  9. 2015Delving Deep into Rectifiers: Surpassing Human-Level Performance on ImageNet Classificationcited by 3,611
  10. 2020Unsupervised Learning of Visual Features by Contrasting Cluster Assignmentscited by 2,857
  11. 2018Neural Tangent Kernel: Convergence and Generalization in Neural Networkscited by 2,621
  12. 2020Improved Baselines with Momentum Contrastive Learningcited by 2,287
29 more
  1. 2013Describing Textures in the Wildcited by 2,125
  2. 2018Unsupervised Feature Learning via Non-Parametric Instance-level Discriminationcited by 1,845
  3. 2020Big Self-Supervised Models are Strong Semi-Supervised Learnerscited by 1,380
  4. 2017Multi-Task Learning Using Uncertainty to Weigh Losses for Scene Geometry and Semanticscited by 1,358
  5. 2018Deep Clustering for Unsupervised Learning of Visual Featurescited by 1,028
  6. 2018MnasNet: Platform-Aware Neural Architecture Search for Mobilecited by 943
  7. 2020What Makes for Good Views for Contrastive Learning?cited by 846
  8. 2020Prototypical Contrastive Learning of Unsupervised Representationscited by 640
  9. 2020When and why PINNs fail to train: A neural tangent kernel perspectivecited by 634
  10. 2018Do Better ImageNet Models Transfer Better?cited by 565
  11. 2019Self-labelling via simultaneous clustering and representation learningcited by 528
  12. 2020How Well Do Self-Supervised Models Transfer?cited by 213
  13. 2020LEEP: A New Measure to Evaluate Transferability of Learned Representationscited by 188
  14. 2021LogME: Practical Assessment of Pre-trained Models for Transfer Learningcited by 172
  15. 2019Transferability and Hardness of Supervised Classification Taskscited by 127
  16. 2019Finite Depth and Width Corrections to the Neural Tangent Kernelcited by 115
  17. 2021A Structured Dictionary Perspective on Implicit Neural Representationscited by 100
  18. 2019Representation Similarity Analysis for Efficient Task taxonomy & Transfer Learningcited by 86
  19. 2022An Information-Theoretic Approach to Transferability in Task Transfer Learningcited by 81
  20. 2021Transferability Estimation using Bhattacharyya Class Separabilitycited by 54
  21. 2020Ranking Neural Checkpointscited by 51
  22. 2021Scalable Diverse Model Selection for Accessible Transfer Learningcited by 40
  23. 2019The Local Elasticity of Neural Networkscited by 37
  24. 2022PACTran: PAC-Bayesian Metrics for Estimating the Transferability of Pretrained Models to Classification Taskscited by 30
  25. 2022A Fast, Well-Founded Approximation to the Empirical Neural Tangent Kernelcited by 30
  26. 2022Not All Models Are Equal: Predicting Model Transferability in a Self-challenging Fisher Spacecited by 30
  27. 2020Duality Diagram Similarity: a generic framework for initialization selection in task transfer learningcited by 23
  28. 2023ETran: Energy-Based Transferability Estimationcited by 18
  29. 2023Exploring Model Transferability through the Lens of Potential Energycited by 11

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2025: 2; 2026: 1.

3 papers.