mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Translationese-index: Using Likelihood Ratios for Graded and Generalizable Measurement of Translationese

arXiv 2507.12260 ↗First posted 16 Jul 2025cs.CLcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Translationese refers to linguistic properties that usually occur in translated texts. Previous works study translationese by framing it as a binary classification between original texts and translated texts. In this paper, we argue that translationese should be graded instead of binary and propose the first measure for translationese -- the translationese-index (T-index), computed from the likelihood ratios of two contrastively fine-tuned language models (LMs). We use synthesized translations and translations in the wild to evaluate T-index's generalizability in cross-domain settings and its validity against human judgments. Our results show that T-index can generalize to unseen genres, authors, and language pairs. Moreover, T-index computed using two 0.5B LMs fine-tuned on only 1-5k pairs of synthetic data can effectively capture translationese, as demonstrated by alignment with human pointwise ratings and pairwise judgments. Additionally, the correlation between T-index and existing machine translation (MT) quality estimation (QE) metrics such as BLEU and COMET is low, suggesting that T-index is not covered by these metrics and can serve as a complementary metric in MT QE.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 30 of its 56 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 16 Jul 2025.

Builds on

30 of 56 references.

References · 30

  1. 2022Training language models to follow instructions with human feedbackcited by 15,971
  2. 2023Direct Preference Optimization: Your Language Model is Secretly a Reward Modelcited by 8,065
  3. 2019Unsupervised Cross-lingual Representation Learning at Scalecited by 3,935
  4. 2016A Baseline for Detecting Misclassified and Out-of-Distribution Examples in Neural Networkscited by 2,385
  5. 2023DetectGPT: Zero-Shot Machine-Generated Text Detection using Probability Curvaturecited by 726
  6. 2021The FLORES-101 Evaluation Benchmark for Low-Resource and Multilingual Machine Translationcited by 560
  7. 2019Release Strategies and the Social Impacts of Language Modelscited by 513
  8. 2019GLTR: Statistical Detection and Visualization of Generated Textcited by 496
  9. 2019Likelihood Ratios for Out-of-Distribution Detectioncited by 453
  10. 2024Skywork-Reward: Bag of Tricks for Reward Modeling in LLMscited by 327
  11. 2020Pretrained Transformers Improve Out-of-Distribution Robustnesscited by 294
  12. 2023Fast-DetectGPT: Efficient Zero-Shot Detection of Machine-Generated Text via Conditional Probability Curvaturecited by 287
18 more
  1. 2023xCOMET: Transparent Machine Translation Evaluation through Fine-grained Error Detectioncited by 265
  2. 2021Quality at a Glance: An Audit of Web-Crawled Multilingual Datasetscited by 243
  3. 2024From r to Q^*: Your Language Model is Secretly a Q-Functioncited by 242
  4. 2022CometKiwi: IST-Unbabel 2022 Submission for the Quality Estimation Shared Taskcited by 207
  5. 2022Out-of-Distribution Detection and Selective Generation for Conditional Language Modelscited by 197
  6. 2021Learning Compact Metrics for MTcited by 93
  7. 2021Types of Out-of-Distribution Texts and How to Detect Themcited by 80
  8. 2024Do Large Language Models Have an English Accent? Evaluating and Improving the Naturalness of Multilingual LLMscited by 19
  9. 2024Embedding Trajectory for Out-of-Distribution Detection in Mathematical Reasoningcited by 18
  10. 2024Can Automatic Metrics Assess High-Quality Translations?cited by 16
  11. 2023Out-of-Distribution Detection by Leveraging Between-Layer Transformation Smoothnesscited by 15
  12. 2021Comparing Feature-Engineering and Feature-Learning Approaches for Multilingual Translationese Classificationcited by 13
  13. 2025Lost in Literalism: How Supervised Training Shapes Translationese in LLMscited by 11
  14. 2024To Diverge or Not to Diverge: A Morphosyntactic Perspective on Machine Translation vs Human Translationcited by 10
  15. 2022Explaining Translationese: why are Neural Classifiers Better and what do they Learn?cited by 5
  16. 2023Measuring Spurious Correlation in Classification: 'Clever Hans' in Translationesecited by 5
  17. 2025You Cannot Feed Two Birds with One Score: the Accuracy-Naturalness Tradeoff in Translationcited by 4
  18. 2018Detecting Syntactic Features of Translated Chinesecited by 2

Built on by

Not cited yet.