Neural Concept Verifier: Scaling Prover-Verifier Games via Concept Encodings
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
While Prover-Verifier Games (PVGs) offer a promising path toward verifiability in nonlinear classification models, they have not yet been applied to complex inputs such as high-dimensional images. Conversely, expressive concept encodings effectively allow to translate such data into interpretable concepts but are often utilised in the context of low-capacity linear predictors. In this work, we push towards real-world verifiability by combining the strengths of both approaches. We introduce Neural Concept Verifier (NCV), a unified framework combining PVGs for formal verifiability with concept encodings to handle complex, high-dimensional inputs in an interpretable way. NCV achieves this by utilizing recent minimally supervised concept discovery models to extract structured concept encodings from raw inputs. A prover then selects a subset of these encodings, which a verifier, implemented as a nonlinear predictor, uses exclusively for decision-making. Our evaluations show that NCV outperforms classic concept-based models and pixel-based PVG classifier baselines on high-dimensional, logically complex datasets and helps mitigate shortcut behavior. Overall, we demonstrate NCV as a promising step toward concept-level, verifiable AI.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 58 of its 80 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 10 Jul 2025.
Builds on
58 of 80 references.
References · 58
- 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 51,809
- 2021Learning Transferable Visual Models From Natural Language Supervisioncited by 33,456
- 2019PyTorch: An Imperative Style, High-Performance Deep Learning Librarycited by 20,160
- 2015U-Net: Convolutional Networks for Biomedical Image Segmentationcited by 19,604
- 2016Gaussian Error Linear Units (GELUs)cited by 3,431
- 2020Shortcut Learning in Deep Neural Networkscited by 1,928
- 2023Improving Factuality and Reasoning in Language Models through Multiagent Debatecited by 1,739
- 2021LAION-400M: Open Dataset of CLIP-Filtered 400 Million Image-Text Pairscited by 1,544
- 2016CLEVR: A Diagnostic Dataset for Compositional Language and Elementary Visual Reasoningcited by 1,445
- 2023Sparse Autoencoders Find Highly Interpretable Features in Language Modelscited by 1,359
- 2017Interpretability Beyond Feature Attribution: Quantitative Testing with Concept Activation Vectors (TCAV)cited by 1,309
- 2020RealToxicityPrompts: Evaluating Neural Toxic Degeneration in Language Modelscited by 1,235
38 more
- 2019Distributionally Robust Neural Networks for Group Shifts: On the Importance of Regularization for Worst-Case Generalizationcited by 1,232
- 2018Sanity Checks for Saliency Mapscited by 1,149
- 2020Concept Bottleneck Modelscited by 1,022
- 2018Which Training Methods for GANs do actually Converge?cited by 672
- 2018AI safety via debatecited by 384
- 2019Unmasking Clever Hans Predictors and Assessing What Machines Really Learncited by 359
- 2021Multimodal datasets: misogyny, pornography, and malignant stereotypescited by 326
- 2022Language in a Bottle: Language Model Guided Concept Bottlenecks for Interpretable Image Classificationcited by 310
- 2017Right for the Right Reasons: Training Differentiable Models by Constraining their Explanationscited by 293
- 2022Post-hoc Concept Bottleneck Modelscited by 289
- 2023Label-Free Concept Bottleneck Modelscited by 282
- 2020Making deep neural networks right for the right scientific reasons by interacting with their explanationscited by 141
- 2021Promises and Pitfalls of Black-Box Concept Learning Modelscited by 128
- 2024Interpreting CLIP with Sparse Linear Concept Embeddings (SpLiCE)cited by 116
- 2021Do Feature Attribution Methods Correctly Attribute Features?cited by 98
- 2023Concept-based Explainable Artificial Intelligence: A Surveycited by 97
- 2020Right for the Right Concept: Revising Neuro-Symbolic Concepts by Interacting with their Explanationscited by 94
- 2020Evaluating Explanations: How much do explanations from the teacher aid students?cited by 94
- 2022Concept Bottleneck Model with Additional Unsupervised Conceptscited by 79
- 2024Prover-Verifier Games improve legibility of LLM outputscited by 79
- 2017Gradient descent GAN optimization is locally stablecited by 65
- 2023Not All Neuro-Symbolic Concepts Are Created Equal: Analysis and Mitigation of Reasoning Shortcutscited by 63
- 2022Concept Activation Regions: A Generalized Framework For Concept-Based Explanationscited by 57
- 2023Interpretable Neural-Symbolic Concept Reasoningcited by 56
- 2023Scalable AI Safety via Doubly-Efficient Debatecited by 54
- 2023DERA: Enhancing Large Language Model Completions with Dialog-Enabled Resolving Agentscited by 52
- 2023In Search of Verifiability: Explanations Rarely Enable Complementary Performance in AI-Advised Decision Makingcited by 50
- 2024Incremental Residual Concept Bottleneck Modelscited by 43
- 2023Coarse-to-Fine Concept Bottleneck Modelscited by 31
- 2021Learning to Give Checkable Answers with Prover-Verifier Gamescited by 29
- 2024Causal Concept Graph Models: Beyond Causal Opacity in Deep Learningcited by 28
- 2023Variational Information Pursuit for Interpretable Predictionscited by 25
- 2024Navigating Shortcuts, Spurious Correlations, and Confounders: From Origins via Detection to Mitigationcited by 22
- 2023Learning by Self-Explainingcited by 17
- 2024Interpretable Concept-Based Memory Reasoningcited by 17
- 2025Causally Reliable Concept Bottleneck Modelscited by 17
- 2025If Concept Bottlenecks are the Question, are Foundation Models the Answer?cited by 15
- 2024Neural Concept Bindercited by 14
50 most cited of 58 All 58 (JSON)
Built on by
Not cited yet.