mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Mitigating Message Imbalance in Fraud Detection with Dual-View Graph Representation Learning

arXiv 2507.06469 ↗First posted 9 Jul 2025cs.LG cs.SIcited by 2

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Graph representation learning has become a mainstream method for fraud detection due to its strong expressive power, which focuses on enhancing node representations through improved neighborhood knowledge capture. However, the focus on local interactions leads to imbalanced transmission of global topological information and increased risk of node-specific information being overwhelmed during aggregation due to the imbalance between fraud and benign nodes. In this paper, we first summarize the impact of topology and class imbalance on downstream tasks in GNN-based fraud detection, as the problem of imbalanced supervisory messages is caused by fraudsters' topological behavior obfuscation and identity feature concealment. Based on statistical validation, we propose a novel dual-view graph representation learning method to mitigate Message imbalance in Fraud Detection (MimbFD). Specifically, we design a topological message reachability module for high-quality node representation learning to penetrate fraudsters' camouflage and alleviate insufficient propagation. Then, we introduce a local confounding debiasing module to adjust node representations, enhancing the stable association between node representations and labels to balance the influence of different classes. Finally, we conducted experiments on three public fraud datasets, and the results demonstrate that MimbFD exhibits outstanding performance in fraud detection.

Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 21 of its 35 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 9 Jul 2025.

Builds on

21 of 35 references.

References · 21

  1. 2016Semi-Supervised Classification with Graph Convolutional Networkscited by 11,361
  2. 2017Graph Attention Networkscited by 8,923
  3. 2017Inductive Representation Learning on Large Graphscited by 6,320
  4. 2020Enhancing Graph Neural Network-based Fraud Detectors against Camouflaged Fraudsterscited by 250
  5. 2021GraphSMOTE: Imbalanced Node Classification on Graphs with Graph Neural Networkscited by 147
  6. 2020Stable Prediction with Model Misspecification and Agnostic Distribution Shiftcited by 62
  7. 2021Topology-Imbalance Learning for Semi-Supervised Node Classificationcited by 56
  8. 2021ImGAGN:Imbalanced Network Embedding via Generative Adversarial Graph Networkscited by 51
  9. 2022TAM: Topology-Aware Margin Loss for Class-Imbalanced Node Classificationcited by 41
  10. 2024Deep Graph Anomaly Detection: A Survey and New Perspectivescited by 40
  11. 2022Position-aware Structure Learning for Graph Topology-imbalance by Relieving Under-reaching and Over-squashingcited by 31
  12. 2023GraphPatcher: Mitigating Degree Bias for Graph Neural Networks via Test-time Augmentationcited by 31
9 more
  1. 2022Debiased Graph Neural Networks with Agnostic Label Selection Biascited by 25
  2. 2023Hyperbolic Geometric Graph Representation Learning for Hierarchy-imbalance Node Classificationcited by 23
  3. 2023Label Information Enhanced Fraud Detection against Low Homophily in Graphscited by 22
  4. 2023GraphSHA: Synthesizing Harder Samples for Class-Imbalanced Node Classificationcited by 17
  5. 2023Poincar'e Differential Privacy for Hierarchy-Aware Graph Embeddingcited by 7
  6. 2024IGL-Bench: Establishing the Comprehensive Benchmark for Imbalanced Graph Learningcited by 6
  7. 2024Discrete Curvature Graph Information Bottleneckcited by 4
  8. 2019Spotting Collective Behaviour of Online Frauds in Customer Reviewscited by 3
  9. 2024Prompt-based Unifying Inference Attack on Graph Neural Networkscited by 3

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2026: 2.

2 papers.