PREF-Gate: Provenance-Constrained Relational Evidence Fusion with Validation-Gated Selection for Graph Fraud Detection
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Relational fraud detection can exploit both label-free graph context and label-derived neighborhood evidence, but these two information sources obey different validity conditions. In particular, neighborhood risk becomes invalid when a queried node's own label, or any validation or test label, enters its construction. We formulate this issue as provenance-constrained relational evidence use and present PREF-Gate, an auditable decision framework with two fixed experts and a finite validation gate. The context expert uses attributes, one-hop means, feature residuals, and degree descriptors without labels. The evidence expert adds self-excluded, training-label-only neighborhood risk and empirical-Bayes summaries that expose support, uncertainty, availability, and shrinkage. Before test inference, the gate selects either expert or one of three pre-specified probability mixtures and fixes the decision threshold. On Amazon, YelpChi, and TFinance, using five identical stratified splits and 14 same-protocol methods, PREF-Gate obtains mean AUPRC values of 0.9085, 0.8104, and 0.8913. It selects the label-free expert on all Amazon and YelpChi splits and an evidence mixture on all TFinance splits. Thus, the main result is conditional rather than universal: label-derived relational evidence is useful only where held-out validation supports it. The framework couples competitive ranking performance with an explicit label-provenance contract, finite selection policy, failure accounting, and review-budget evaluation, providing an auditable knowledge-based decision pipeline for graph fraud detection.
Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 14 of its 36 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 13 Jul 2026.
Builds on
14 of 36 references.
References · 14
- 2016Semi-Supervised Classification with Graph Convolutional Networkscited by 11,282
- 2017Graph Attention Networkscited by 8,854
- 2017Inductive Representation Learning on Large Graphscited by 6,284
- 2017On Calibration of Modern Neural Networkscited by 4,860
- 2018How Powerful are Graph Neural Networks?cited by 4,355
- 2020Enhancing Graph Neural Network-based Fraud Detectors against Camouflaged Fraudsterscited by 248
- 2022Rethinking Graph Neural Networks for Anomaly Detectioncited by 185
- 2021Anomaly Detection on Attributed Networks via Contrastive Self-Supervised Learningcited by 175
- 2021GraphSMOTE: Imbalanced Node Classification on Graphs with Graph Neural Networkscited by 147
- 2020Alleviating the Inconsistency Problem of Applying Graph Neural Network to Fraud Detectioncited by 81
- 2022What Makes Graph Neural Networks Miscalibrated?cited by 39
- 2025A Label-Free Heterophily-Guided Approach for Unsupervised Graph Fraud Detectioncited by 24
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2026: 2.
2 papers.