mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

PREF-Gate: Provenance-Constrained Relational Evidence Fusion with Validation-Gated Selection for Graph Fraud Detection

arXiv 2607.11212 ↗First posted 13 Jul 2026cs.AI cs.LGcited by 2

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Relational fraud detection can exploit both label-free graph context and label-derived neighborhood evidence, but these two information sources obey different validity conditions. In particular, neighborhood risk becomes invalid when a queried node's own label, or any validation or test label, enters its construction. We formulate this issue as provenance-constrained relational evidence use and present PREF-Gate, an auditable decision framework with two fixed experts and a finite validation gate. The context expert uses attributes, one-hop means, feature residuals, and degree descriptors without labels. The evidence expert adds self-excluded, training-label-only neighborhood risk and empirical-Bayes summaries that expose support, uncertainty, availability, and shrinkage. Before test inference, the gate selects either expert or one of three pre-specified probability mixtures and fixes the decision threshold. On Amazon, YelpChi, and TFinance, using five identical stratified splits and 14 same-protocol methods, PREF-Gate obtains mean AUPRC values of 0.9085, 0.8104, and 0.8913. It selects the label-free expert on all Amazon and YelpChi splits and an evidence mixture on all TFinance splits. Thus, the main result is conditional rather than universal: label-derived relational evidence is useful only where held-out validation supports it. The framework couples competitive ranking performance with an explicit label-provenance contract, finite selection policy, failure accounting, and review-budget evaluation, providing an auditable knowledge-based decision pipeline for graph fraud detection.

Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 14 of its 36 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 13 Jul 2026.

Builds on

14 of 36 references.

References · 14

  1. 2016Semi-Supervised Classification with Graph Convolutional Networkscited by 11,282
  2. 2017Graph Attention Networkscited by 8,854
  3. 2017Inductive Representation Learning on Large Graphscited by 6,284
  4. 2017On Calibration of Modern Neural Networkscited by 4,860
  5. 2018How Powerful are Graph Neural Networks?cited by 4,355
  6. 2020Enhancing Graph Neural Network-based Fraud Detectors against Camouflaged Fraudsterscited by 248
  7. 2022Rethinking Graph Neural Networks for Anomaly Detectioncited by 185
  8. 2021Anomaly Detection on Attributed Networks via Contrastive Self-Supervised Learningcited by 175
  9. 2021GraphSMOTE: Imbalanced Node Classification on Graphs with Graph Neural Networkscited by 147
  10. 2020Alleviating the Inconsistency Problem of Applying Graph Neural Network to Fraud Detectioncited by 81
  11. 2022What Makes Graph Neural Networks Miscalibrated?cited by 39
  12. 2025A Label-Free Heterophily-Guided Approach for Unsupervised Graph Fraud Detectioncited by 24
2 more
  1. 2024Partitioning Message Passing for Graph Fraud Detectioncited by 21
  2. 2025Mitigating Message Imbalance in Fraud Detection with Dual-View Graph Representation Learningcited by 2

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2026: 2.

2 papers.