ModelCitizens: Representing Community Voices in Online Safety
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Automatic toxic language detection is critical for creating safe, inclusive online spaces. However, it is a highly subjective task, with perceptions of toxic language shaped by community norms and lived experience. Existing toxicity detection models are typically trained on annotations that collapse diverse annotator perspectives into a single ground truth, erasing important context-specific notions of toxicity such as reclaimed language. To address this, we introduce MODELCITIZENS, a dataset of 6.8K social media posts and 40K toxicity annotations across diverse identity groups. To capture the role of conversational context on toxicity, typical of social media posts, we augment MODELCITIZENS posts with LLM-generated conversational scenarios. State-of-the-art toxicity detection tools (e.g. OpenAI Moderation API, GPT-o4-mini) underperform on MODELCITIZENS, with further degradation on context-augmented posts. Finally, we release LLAMACITIZEN-8B and GEMMACITIZEN-12B, LLaMA- and Gemma-based models finetuned on MODELCITIZENS, which outperform GPT-o4-mini by 5.5% on in-distribution evaluations. Our findings highlight the importance of community-informed annotation and modeling for inclusive content moderation. The data, models and code are available at https://github.com/asuvarna31/modelcitizens.
Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 25 of its 50 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 7 Jul 2025.
Builds on
25 of 50 references.
References · 25
- 2024The Llama 3 Herd of Modelscited by 14,715
- 2024LlamaFactory: Unified Efficient Fine-Tuning of 100+ Language Modelscited by 1,464
- 2017Automated Hate Speech Detection and the Problem of Offensive Languagecited by 736
- 2022ToxiGen: A Large-Scale Machine-Generated Dataset for Adversarial and Implicit Hate Speech Detectioncited by 422
- 2019Social Bias Frames: Reasoning about Social and Power Implications of Languagecited by 380
- 2018Large Scale Crowdsourcing and Characterization of Twitter Abusive Behaviorcited by 270
- 2021Annotators with Attitudes: How Annotator Beliefs And Identities Bias Toxic Language Detectioncited by 264
- 2020Participatory Research for Low-resourced Machine Translation: A Case Study in African Languagescited by 159
- 2022Pile of Law: Learning Responsible Data Filtering from the Law and a 256GB Open-Source Legal Datasetcited by 113
- 2020Participation is not a Design Fix for Machine Learningcited by 111
- 2023NLPositionality: Characterizing Design Biases of Datasets and Modelscited by 94
- 2020Toxicity Detection: Does Context Really Matter?cited by 93
13 more
- 2023When the Majority is Wrong: Modeling Annotator Disagreement for Subjective Taskscited by 90
- 2023The Participatory Turn in AI Design: Theoretical Foundations and the Current State of Practicecited by 87
- 2022Is Your Toxicity My Toxicity? Exploring the Impact of Rater Identity on Toxicity Annotationcited by 69
- 2023When Do Annotator Demographics Matter? Measuring the Influence of Annotator Demographics with the POPQUORN Datasetcited by 52
- 2023Exploring Cross-Cultural Differences in English Hate Speech Annotations: From Dataset Construction to Analysiscited by 45
- 2024The Perspectivist Paradigm Shift: Assumptions and Challenges of Capturing Human Labelscited by 38
- 2023Queer In AI: A Case Study in Community-Led Participatory AIcited by 34
- 2023COBRA Frames: Contextual Reasoning about Effects and Harms of Offensive Statementscited by 34
- 2022Hate Speech and Counter Speech Detection: Conversational Context Does Mattercited by 32
- 2024Participation in the age of foundation modelscited by 32
- 2024Comparing Bad Apples to Good Oranges: Aligning Large Language Models via Joint Preference Optimizationcited by 15
- 2025HateBench: Benchmarking Hate Speech Detectors on LLM-Generated Content and Hate Campaignscited by 14
- 2023HateModerate: Testing Hate Speech Detectors against Content Moderation Policiescited by 7
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2026: 1.
1 paper.