CTA: Cross-Task Alignment for Better Test Time Training
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Deep learning models have demonstrated exceptional performance across a wide range of computer vision tasks. However, their performance often degrades significantly when faced with distribution shifts, such as domain or dataset changes. Test-Time Training (TTT) has emerged as an effective method to enhance model robustness by incorporating an auxiliary unsupervised task during training and leveraging it for model updates at test time. In this work, we introduce CTA (Cross-Task Alignment), a novel approach for improving TTT. Unlike existing TTT methods, CTA does not require a specialized model architecture and instead takes inspiration from the success of multi-modal contrastive learning to align a supervised encoder with a self-supervised one. This process enforces alignment between the learned representations of both models, thereby mitigating the risk of gradient interference, preserving the intrinsic robustness of self-supervised learning and enabling more semantically meaningful updates at test-time. Experimental results demonstrate substantial improvements in robustness and generalization over the state-of-the-art on several benchmark datasets.
Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 19 of its 31 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 7 Jul 2025.
Builds on
19 of 31 references.
References · 19
- 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 52,096
- 2021Learning Transferable Visual Models From Natural Language Supervisioncited by 33,744
- 2020A Simple Framework for Contrastive Learning of Visual Representationscited by 12,049
- 2015Distilling the Knowledge in a Neural Networkcited by 10,324
- 2019Benchmarking Neural Network Robustness to Common Corruptions and Perturbationscited by 2,877
- 2017Deep Hashing Network for Unsupervised Domain Adaptationcited by 1,188
- 2017An Overview of Multi-Task Learning in Deep Neural Networkscited by 803
- 2021Domain Generalization: A Surveycited by 764
- 2021Domain Generalization with MixStylecited by 566
- 2021SWAD: Domain Generalization by Seeking Flat Minimacited by 434
- 2022Test-Time Prompt Tuning for Zero-Shot Generalization in Vision-Language Modelscited by 382
- 2021Accuracy on the Line: On the Strong Correlation Between Out-of-Distribution and In-Distribution Generalizationcited by 249
7 more
- 2020Evaluating Prediction-Time Batch Normalization for Robustness under Covariate Shiftcited by 236
- 2022Test-Time Training with Masked Autoencoderscited by 212
- 2021No One Representation to Rule Them All: Overlapping Features of Training Methodscited by 58
- 2022TTTFlow: Unsupervised Test-Time Training with Normalizing Flowcited by 33
- 2022How Robust is Unsupervised Representation Learning to Distribution Shift?cited by 24
- 2023ClusT3: Information Invariant Test-Time Trainingcited by 21
- 2024ReC-TTT: Contrastive Feature Reconstruction for Test-Time Trainingcited by 5
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2026: 1.
1 paper.