mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

ReC-TTT: Contrastive Feature Reconstruction for Test-Time Training

arXiv 2411.17869 ↗First posted 26 Nov 2024cs.CV cs.LGcited by 5

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

The remarkable progress in deep learning (DL) showcases outstanding results in various computer vision tasks. However, adaptation to real-time variations in data distributions remains an important challenge. Test-Time Training (TTT) was proposed as an effective solution to this issue, which increases the generalization ability of trained models by adding an auxiliary task at train time and then using its loss at test time to adapt the model. Inspired by the recent achievements of contrastive representation learning in unsupervised tasks, we propose ReC-TTT, a test-time training technique that can adapt a DL model to new unseen domains by generating discriminative views of the input data. ReC-TTT uses cross-reconstruction as an auxiliary task between a frozen encoder and two trainable encoders, taking advantage of a single shared decoder. This enables, at test time, to adapt the encoders to extract features that will be correctly reconstructed by the decoder that, in this phase, is frozen on the source domain. Experimental results show that ReC-TTT achieves better results than other state-of-the-art techniques in most domain shift classification challenges.

Key facts. Cited by 5 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 21 of its 32 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 26 Nov 2024.

Builds on

21 of 32 references.

References · 21

  1. 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 52,096
  2. 2021Learning Transferable Visual Models From Natural Language Supervisioncited by 33,744
  3. 2020A Simple Framework for Contrastive Learning of Visual Representationscited by 12,049
  4. 2019Momentum Contrast for Unsupervised Visual Representation Learningcited by 7,513
  5. 2019Benchmarking Neural Network Robustness to Common Corruptions and Perturbationscited by 2,877
  6. 2020Exploring Simple Siamese Representation Learningcited by 2,866
  7. 2019Do ImageNet Classifiers Generalize to ImageNet?cited by 1,515
  8. 2017Deep Hashing Network for Unsupervised Domain Adaptationcited by 1,188
  9. 2021Domain Generalization: A Surveycited by 764
  10. 2021Domain Generalization with MixStylecited by 566
  11. 2021SWAD: Domain Generalization by Seeking Flat Minimacited by 434
  12. 2017A Downsampled Variant of ImageNet as an Alternative to the CIFAR datasetscited by 377
9 more
  1. 2022Contrastive Test-Time Adaptationcited by 261
  2. 2021Accuracy on the Line: On the Strong Correlation Between Out-of-Distribution and In-Distribution Generalizationcited by 249
  3. 2020Evaluating Prediction-Time Batch Normalization for Robustness under Covariate Shiftcited by 236
  4. 2022Test-Time Training with Masked Autoencoderscited by 212
  5. 2022Surgical Fine-Tuning Improves Adaptation to Distribution Shiftscited by 205
  6. 2023ReContrast: Domain-Specific Anomaly Detection via Contrastive Reconstructioncited by 63
  7. 2022Divide and Contrast: Source-free Domain Adaptation via Adaptive Contrastive Learningcited by 53
  8. 2022TTTFlow: Unsupervised Test-Time Training with Normalizing Flowcited by 33
  9. 2023ClusT3: Information Invariant Test-Time Trainingcited by 21

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2025: 3; 2026: 2.

5 papers.