Pseudo-likelihood produces associative memories able to generalize, even for asymmetric couplings
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Energy-based probabilistic models learned by maximizing the likelihood of the data are limited by the intractability of the partition function. A widely used workaround is to maximize the pseudo-likelihood, which replaces the global normalization with tractable local normalizations. Here we show that, in the zero-temperature limit, a network trained to maximize pseudo-likelihood naturally implements an associative memory: if the training set is small, patterns become fixed-point attractors whose basins of attraction exceed those of any classical Hopfield rule. We explain quantitatively this effect on uncorrelated random patterns. Moreover, we show that, for different structured datasets coming from computer science (random feature model, MNIST), physics (spin glasses) and biology (proteins), as the number of training examples increases the learned network goes beyond memorization, developing meaningful attractors with non-trivial correlations with test examples, thus showing the ability to generalize. Our results therefore reveal pseudo-likelihood works both as an efficient inference tool and as a principled mechanism for memory and generalization.
Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 31 of its 80 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 7 Jul 2025.
Builds on
31 of 80 references.
References · 31
- 2020Denoising Diffusion Probabilistic Modelscited by 21,076
- 2015U-Net: Convolutional Networks for Biomedical Image Segmentationcited by 19,713
- 2017The Implicit Bias of Gradient Descent on Separable Datacited by 655
- 2020Hopfield Networks is All You Needcited by 475
- 2021How to Train Your Energy-Based Modelscited by 274
- 2016Dense Associative Memory for Pattern Recognitioncited by 236
- 2020Generalisation error in learning with random features and the hidden manifold modelcited by 127
- 2025Why Diffusion Models Don't Memorize: The Role of Implicit Dynamical Regularization in Trainingcited by 81
- 2023Energy Transformercited by 71
- 2020Generalization error in high-dimensional perceptrons: Approaching Bayes error with convex optimizationcited by 51
- 2023In search of dispersed memories: Generative diffusion models are associative memory networkscited by 44
- 2017Inverse statistical problems: from the inverse Ising problem to data sciencecited by 36
19 more
- 2020Restricted Boltzmann Machine, recent advances and mean-field theorycited by 31
- 2021Learning through atypical "phase transitions" in overparameterized neural networkscited by 21
- 2023Mapping of attention mechanisms to a generalized Potts modelcited by 19
- 2022Supervised Hebbian Learningcited by 16
- 2018Dreaming neural networks: forgetting spurious memories and reinforcing pure onescited by 15
- 2021Tractability from overparametrization: The example of the negative perceptroncited by 12
- 2023Explaining the effects of non-convergent sampling in the training of Energy-Based Modelscited by 12
- 2023Storage and Learning phase transitions in the Random-Features Hopfield Modelcited by 11
- 2021Supervised perceptron learning vs unsupervised Hebbian unlearning: Approaching optimal memory retrieval in Hopfield-like networkscited by 9
- 2024Fast training and sampling of Restricted Boltzmann Machinescited by 9
- 2024Random Features Hopfield Networks generalize retrieval to previously unseen examplescited by 8
- 2023Fast and Functional Structured Data Generators Rooted in Out-of-Equilibrium Physicscited by 7
- 2025Inferring Higher-Order Couplings with Neural Networkscited by 7
- 2024Bridging Associative Memory and Probabilistic Modelingcited by 5
- 2025A theoretical framework for overfitting in energy-based modelingcited by 5
- 2023Unsupervised hierarchical clustering using the learning dynamics of RBMscited by 4
- 2024Self-attention as an attractor network: transient memories without backpropagationcited by 3
- 2025Implicit bias produces neural scaling laws in learning curves, from perceptrons to deep networkscited by 2
- 2018From statistical inference to a differential learning rule for stochastic neural networkscited by 1
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2025: 1; 2026: 1.
2 papers.