Multi-Modal Semantic Parsing for the Interpretation of Tombstone Inscriptions
On the map: Multimodal LLMs / vision-language models → VLM benchmarks and visual reasoning
Abstract (arXiv)
Tombstones are historically and culturally rich artifacts, encapsulating individual lives, community memory, historical narratives and artistic expression. Yet, many tombstones today face significant preservation challenges, including physical erosion, vandalism, environmental degradation, and political shifts. In this paper, we introduce a novel multi-modal framework for tombstones digitization, aiming to improve the interpretation, organization and retrieval of tombstone content. Our approach leverages vision-language models (VLMs) to translate tombstone images into structured Tombstone Meaning Representations (TMRs), capturing both image and text information. To further enrich semantic parsing, we incorporate retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) for integrate externally dependent elements such as toponyms, occupation codes, and ontological concepts. Compared to traditional OCR-based pipelines, our method improves parsing accuracy from an F1 score of 36.1 to 89.5. We additionally evaluate the model's robustness across diverse linguistic and cultural inscriptions, and simulate physical degradation through image fusion to assess performance under noisy or damaged conditions. Our work represents the first attempt to formalize tombstone understanding using large vision-language models, presenting implications for heritage preservation.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Placed in VLM benchmarks and visual reasoning, one of 16 directions in Multimodal LLMs / vision-language models. Builds on 14 of its 56 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 6 Jul 2025.
Builds on
14 of 56 references.
Closest ancestors · 1
Same direction, newest first
Other references · 13
- 2025Qwen2.5-VL Technical Reportcited by 5,587
- 2017Neural Semantic Parsing by Character-based Translation: Experiments with Abstract Meaning Representationscited by 18
- 2018Exploring Neural Methods for Parsing Discourse Representation Structurescited by 15
- 2023"You Are An Expert Linguistic Annotator": Limits of LLMs as Analyzers of Abstract Meaning Representationcited by 15
- 2016RIGA at SemEval-2016 Task 8: Impact of Smatch Extensions and Character-Level Neural Translation on AMR Parsing Accuracycited by 11
- 2024Neural Semantic Parsing with Extremely Rich Symbolic Meaning Representationscited by 6
- 2024PMB5: Gaining More Insight into Neural Semantic Parsing with Challenging Benchmarkscited by 5
- 2022Visual Semantic Parsing: From Images to Abstract Meaning Representationcited by 4
- 2023Discourse Representation Structure Parsing for Chinesecited by 3
- 2024MACT: Model-Agnostic Cross-Lingual Training for Discourse Representation Structure Parsingcited by 3
- 2020Attention Guided Semantic Relationship Parsing for Visual Question Answeringcited by 2
- 2020Character-level Representations Improve DRS-based Semantic Parsing Even in the Age of BERTcited by 2
1 more
- 2024Scope-enhanced Compositional Semantic Parsing for DRTcited by 2
Built on by
Not cited yet.
Similar, not cited
Close in wording, no citation either way
- 2025Provenance Analysis of Archaeological Artifacts via Multimodal RAG Systems
- 2023Knowledge-Aware Artifact Image Synthesis with LLM-Enhanced Prompting and Multi-Source Supervision
- 2024An archaeological Catalog Collection Method Based on Large Vision-Language Models
- 2026AmalthAI: An Open-Source Computer Vision Platform for Cultural Heritage
- 2026Appear2Meaning: A Cross-Cultural Benchmark for Structured Cultural Metadata Inference from Images
- 2026On the Cultural Anachronism and Temporal Reasoning in Vision Language Models
- 2026From Pixels to Structure: Lightweight Vision-Language Models for Document OCR and Structured JSON Extraction
- 2025LLM-Driven Completeness and Consistency Evaluation for Cultural Heritage Data Augmentation in Cross-Modal Retrieval