From Pixels to Structure: Lightweight Vision-Language Models for Document OCR and Structured JSON Extraction
On the map: Multimodal LLMs / vision-language models → Document understanding and multimodal RAG
Abstract (arXiv)
While massive, closed-source Vision-Language Models (VLMs) set strong benchmarks for document understanding, their dependence on commercial APIs limits adoption in institutional archives due to data autonomy concerns, recurring costs, and the environmental footprint of hyperscale computing. This is especially acute in heritage digitization, where documents include historical handwriting, domain-specific terminology (e.g., jewelry, prehistory, architecture), and non-standard layouts requiring high-dimensional structured extraction. We present a comparative study of eight open-source lightweight VLMs (up to 7B parameters) for Optical Character Recognition (OCR)-to-structure across three university heritage collections. Given a document image, models must extract text and generate schema-compliant JSON, enabling automatic validation and downstream use. We evaluate models under a constraint-aware protocol across zero-shot, few-shot, and fine-tuning settings, measuring extraction fidelity and structured-output quality using Character Error Rate (CER), Approximate Normalized Levenshtein Similarity (ANLS*), and mean Average Precision F1 (mAP-F1). Against a fine-tuning baseline, we further test the independent impact of (i) hyperparameter optimization, (ii) classical image preprocessing (illumination flattening, denoising, and CLAHE), and (iii) multi-stage training. Finally, we analyze the trade-off between dataset-specific fine-tuning and a single multi-dataset checkpoint, where joint training enables one model to operate across collections but can shift performance between datasets. Overall, we show that carefully adapted VLMs with up to 7B parameters can provide a sustainable, private, high-performing alternative to manual transcription or commercial black-box systems, and we offer actionable guidance for heritage institutions seeking institution-controlled OCR-to-JSON extraction.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Placed in Document understanding and multimodal RAG, one of 16 directions in Multimodal LLMs / vision-language models. Builds on 13 of its 35 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 8 Oct 2026.
Builds on
13 of 35 references.
Closest ancestors · 2
Same direction, newest first
- 2025PaddleOCR-VL: Boosting Multilingual Document Parsing via a 0.9B Ultra-Compact Vision-Language Model16 Oct
- 2023mPLUG-DocOwl: Modularized Multimodal Large Language Model for Document Understanding4 Jul
Other references · 11
- 2025Qwen2.5-VL Technical Reportcited by 5,587
- 2024Qwen2-VL: Enhancing Vision-Language Model's Perception of the World at Any Resolutioncited by 4,234
- 2023Qwen-VL: A Versatile Vision-Language Model for Understanding, Localization, Text Reading, and Beyondcited by 2,224
- 2025Gemma 3 Technical Reportcited by 1,824
- 2024MiniCPM-V: A GPT-4V Level MLLM on Your Phonecited by 1,079
- 2024PaliGemma: A versatile 3B VLM for transfercited by 696
- 2025SmolVLM: Redefining small and efficient multimodal modelscited by 237
- 2025DeepSeek-OCR: Contexts Optical Compressioncited by 183
- 2024General OCR Theory: Towards OCR-2.0 via a Unified End-to-end Modelcited by 180
- 2024Pixtral 12Bcited by 179
- 2024ANLS* -- A Universal Document Processing Metric for Generative Large Language Modelscited by 10
Built on by
Not cited yet.
Similar, not cited
Close in wording, no citation either way
- 2026Evaluating Structured Information Extraction with Open Models in a High Risk Public Sector Application
- 2026Structure-Aware Text Recognition for Ancient Greek Critical Editions
- 2026Identify, Locate, Link: End-to-End Key-Value Extraction from Document Images
- 2026When Simpler Is Better: Evaluating Translation Pipelines for Medieval Latin Manuscripts
- 2026A Survey of OCR Evaluation Methods and Metrics and the Invisibility of Historical Documents
- 2025CHURRO: Making History Readable with an Open-Weight Large Vision-Language Model for High-Accuracy, Low-Cost Historical Text Recognition
- 2026Error Patterns in Historical OCR: A Comparative Analysis of TrOCR and a Vision-Language Model
- 2026When Low CER is Not Enough: An Analysis of Hallucinations in Vision-Language OCR Systems on Historical Uruguayan Documents