mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

PMB5: Gaining More Insight into Neural Semantic Parsing with Challenging Benchmarks

arXiv 2404.08354 ↗First posted 12 Apr 2024cs.CLcited by 5

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

The Parallel Meaning Bank (PMB) serves as a corpus for semantic processing with a focus on semantic parsing and text generation. Currently, we witness an excellent performance of neural parsers and generators on the PMB. This might suggest that such semantic processing tasks have by and large been solved. We argue that this is not the case and that performance scores from the past on the PMB are inflated by non-optimal data splits and test sets that are too easy. In response, we introduce several changes. First, instead of the prior random split, we propose a more systematic splitting approach to improve the reliability of the standard test data. Second, except for the standard test set, we also propose two challenge sets: one with longer texts including discourse structure, and one that addresses compositional generalization. We evaluate five neural models for semantic parsing and meaning-to-text generation. Our results show that model performance declines (in some cases dramatically) on the challenge sets, revealing the limitations of neural models when confronting such challenges.

Key facts. Cited by 5 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 25 of its 60 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 12 Apr 2024.

Builds on

25 of 60 references.

References · 25

  1. 2018BERT: Pre-training of Deep Bidirectional Transformers for Language Understandingcited by 40,399
  2. 2019Exploring the Limits of Transfer Learning with a Unified Text-to-Text Transformercited by 14,599
  3. 2019BART: Denoising Sequence-to-Sequence Pre-training for Natural Language Generation, Translation, and Comprehensioncited by 5,893
  4. 2015Neural Machine Translation of Rare Words with Subword Unitscited by 2,918
  5. 2020mT5: A massively multilingual pre-trained text-to-text transformercited by 1,818
  6. 2020Multilingual Denoising Pre-training for Neural Machine Translationcited by 1,035
  7. 2020COMET: A Neural Framework for MT Evaluationcited by 1,033
  8. 2021ByT5: Towards a token-free future with pre-trained byte-to-byte modelscited by 509
  9. 2020COGS: A Compositional Generalization Challenge Based on Semantic Interpretationcited by 263
  10. 2018Adversarial Removal of Demographic Attributes from Text Datacited by 170
  11. 2020Compositional Generalization in Semantic Parsing: Pre-training vs. Specialized Architecturescited by 95
  12. 2020We Need to Talk About Random Splitscited by 71
13 more
  1. 2017The Parallel Meaning Bank: Towards a Multilingual Corpus of Translations Annotated with Compositional Meaning Representationscited by 42
  2. 2023A Better Way to Do Masked Language Model Scoringcited by 27
  3. 2018Exploring Neural Methods for Parsing Discourse Representation Structurescited by 15
  4. 2017Towards Universal Semantic Taggingcited by 12
  5. 2023Pre-Trained Language-Meaning Models for Multilingual Parsing and Generationcited by 10
  6. 2022Better Smatch = Better Parser? AMR evaluation is not so simple anymorecited by 9
  7. 2019Semantic Graph Parsing with Recurrent Neural Network DAG Grammarscited by 8
  8. 2023AMR Parsing is Far from Solved: GrAPES, the Granular AMR Parsing Evaluation Suitecited by 6
  9. 2020The First Shared Task on Discourse Representation Structure Parsingcited by 5
  10. 2016Semantic Tagging with Deep Residual Networkscited by 4
  11. 2020DRTS Parsing with Structure-Aware Encoding and Decodingcited by 3
  12. 2018What can we learn from Semantic Tagging?cited by 2
  13. 2020The Parallel Meaning Bank: A Framework for Semantically Annotating Multiple Languagescited by 2

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2024: 2; 2025: 2; 2026: 1.

5 papers.