mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Normalizing Flow to Augmented Posterior: Conditional Density Estimation with Interpretable Dimension Reduction for High Dimensional Data

arXiv 2507.04216 ↗First posted 6 Jul 2025stat.ME stat.AP stat.MLcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

The conditional density characterizes the distribution of a response variable y given other predictor x, and plays a key role in many statistical tasks, including classification and outlier detection. Although there has been abundant work on the problem of Conditional Density Estimation (CDE) for a low-dimensional response in the presence of a high-dimensional predictor, little work has been done for a high-dimensional response such as images. The promising performance of normalizing flow (NF) neural networks in unconditional density estimation acts a motivating starting point. In this work, we extend NF neural networks when external x is present. Specifically, they use the NF to parameterize a one-to-one transform between a high-dimensional y and a latent z that comprises two components ([zP,zN]). The zP component is a low-dimensional subvector obtained from the posterior distribution of an elementary predictive model for x, such as logistic/linear regression. The zN component is a high-dimensional independent Gaussian vector, which explains the variations in y not or less related to x. Unlike existing CDE methods, the proposed approach, coined Augmented Posterior CDE (AP-CDE), only requires a simple modification on the common normalizing flow framework, while significantly improving the interpretation of the latent component, since zP represents a supervised dimension reduction. In image analytics applications, AP-CDE shows good separation of x-related variations due to factors such as lighting condition and subject id, from the other random variations. Further, the experiments show that an unconditional NF neural network, based on an unsupervised model of z, such as Gaussian mixture, fails to generate interpretable results.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 20 of its 53 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 6 Jul 2025.

Builds on

20 of 53 references.

References · 20

  1. 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 52,096
  2. 2016SGDR: Stochastic Gradient Descent with Warm Restartscited by 5,045
  3. 2017Fashion-MNIST: a Novel Image Dataset for Benchmarking Machine Learning Algorithmscited by 4,349
  4. 2018UMAP: Uniform Manifold Approximation and Projection for Dimension Reductioncited by 2,898
  5. 2016Density estimation using Real NVPcited by 2,042
  6. 2018Glow: Generative Flow with Invertible 1x1 Convolutionscited by 1,545
  7. 2019Normalizing Flows for Probabilistic Modeling and Inferencecited by 1,323
  8. 2017Masked Autoregressive Flow for Density Estimationcited by 684
  9. 2018FFJORD: Free-form Continuous Dynamics for Scalable Reversible Generative Modelscited by 594
  10. 2018Invertible Residual Networkscited by 365
  11. 2019Residual Flows for Invertible Generative Modelingcited by 257
  12. 2014Inconsistency of Bayesian Inference for Misspecified Linear Models, and a Proposal for Repairing Itcited by 95
8 more
  1. 2019Semi-Supervised Learning with Normalizing Flowscited by 76
  2. 2019Hybrid Models with Deep and Invertible Featurescited by 41
  3. 2019Conditional Density Estimation with Neural Networks: Best Practices and Benchmarkscited by 38
  4. 2020A Critique of Self-Expressive Deep Subspace Clusteringcited by 18
  5. 2017The Kernel Mixture Network: A Nonparametric Method for Conditional Density Estimation of Continuous Random Variablescited by 15
  6. 2020Escaping the curse of dimensionality in Bayesian model based clusteringcited by 12
  7. 2022Evaluating Aleatoric Uncertainty via Conditional Generative Modelscited by 10
  8. 2019AOP: An Anti-overfitting Pretreatment for Practical Image-based Plant Diagnosiscited by 5

Built on by

Not cited yet.