Escaping the curse of dimensionality in Bayesian model based clustering
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Bayesian mixture models are widely used for clustering of high-dimensional data with appropriate uncertainty quantification. However, as the dimension of the observations increases, posterior inference often tends to favor too many or too few clusters. This article explains this behavior by studying the random partition posterior in a non-standard setting with a fixed sample size and increasing data dimensionality. We provide conditions under which the finite sample posterior tends to either assign every observation to a different cluster or all observations to the same cluster as the dimension grows. Interestingly, the conditions do not depend on the choice of clustering prior, as long as all possible partitions of observations into clusters have positive prior probabilities, and hold irrespective of the true data-generating model. We then propose a class of latent mixtures for Bayesian clustering (Lamb) on a set of low-dimensional latent variables inducing a partition on the observed data. The model is amenable to scalable posterior inference and we show that it can avoid the pitfalls of high-dimensionality under mild assumptions. The proposed approach is shown to have good performance in simulation studies and an application to inferring cell types based on scRNAseq.
Key facts. Cited by 12 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 4 Jun 2020.
Builds on
No reference list yet.
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2022: 1; 2023: 1; 2024: 5; 2025: 3; 2026: 2.
12 papers.
- 2024Bayesian Joint Additive Factor Models for Multiview Learningcited by 5
- 2024Autoregressive Adaptive Hypergraph Transformer for Skeleton-based Activity Recognitioncited by 4
- 2024Summarizing Bayesian Nonparametric Mixture Posterior -- Sliced Optimal Transport Metrics for Gaussian Mixturescited by 4
- 2023Bayesian Transfer Learningcited by 3
- 2022Bayesian nonparametric mixture inconsistency for the number of components: How worried should we be in practice?cited by 1
- 2024Negative-Binomial Randomized Gamma Markov Processes for Heterogeneous Overdispersed Count Time Seriescited by 1
- 2026Scalable Posterior Uncertainty for Flexible Density-Based Clusteringcited by 1
- 2026Vertical Consensus Inference for High-Dimensional Random Partitioncited by 1
- 2024The Relevance Feature and Vector Machine for health applicationscited by 0
- 2025Normalizing Flow to Augmented Posterior: Conditional Density Estimation with Interpretable Dimension Reduction for High Dimensional Datacited by 0
- 2025Syntax-Guided Diffusion Language Models with User-Integrated Personalizationcited by 0
- 2025A fast non-reversible sampler for Bayesian mixture modelscited by 0
- 2026Vertical Consensus Inference for High-Dimensional Random Partition29 Mar 2026
- 2026Scalable Posterior Uncertainty for Flexible Density-Based Clustering3 Mar 2026
- 2025A fast non-reversible sampler for Bayesian mixture models3 Oct 2025
- 2025Syntax-Guided Diffusion Language Models with User-Integrated Personalization1 Oct 2025
- 2025Normalizing Flow to Augmented Posterior: Conditional Density Estimation with Interpretable Dimension Reduction for High Dimensional Data6 Jul 2025
- 2024Summarizing Bayesian Nonparametric Mixture Posterior -- Sliced Optimal Transport Metrics for Gaussian Mixtures22 Nov 2024
- 2024Autoregressive Adaptive Hypergraph Transformer for Skeleton-based Activity Recognition8 Nov 2024
- 2024Bayesian Joint Additive Factor Models for Multiview Learning2 Jun 2024
- 2024Negative-Binomial Randomized Gamma Markov Processes for Heterogeneous Overdispersed Count Time Series29 Feb 2024
- 2024The Relevance Feature and Vector Machine for health applications11 Feb 2024
- 2023Bayesian Transfer Learning20 Dec 2023
- 2022Bayesian nonparametric mixture inconsistency for the number of components: How worried should we be in practice?29 Jul 2022