Frustratingly Simple Retrieval Improves Challenging, Reasoning-Intensive Benchmarks
On the map: Retrieval-augmented generation → RAG robustness and adaptive retrieval
Abstract (arXiv)
Retrieval-augmented Generation (RAG) has primarily been studied in limited settings, such as factoid question answering; more challenging, reasoning-intensive benchmarks have seen limited success from minimal RAG. In this work, we challenge this prevailing view on established, reasoning-intensive benchmarks: MMLU, MMLU Pro, AGI Eval, GPQA, and MATH. We identify a key missing component in prior work: a usable, web-scale datastore aligned with the breadth of pretraining data. To this end, we introduce CompactDS: a diverse, high-quality, web-scale datastore that achieves high retrieval accuracy and subsecond latency on a single-node. The key insights are (1) most web content can be filtered out without sacrificing coverage, and a compact, high-quality subset is sufficient; and (2) combining in-memory approximate nearest neighbor (ANN) retrieval and on-disk exact search balances speed and recall. Using CompactDS, we show that a minimal RAG pipeline achieves consistent accuracy improvements across all benchmarks and model sizes (8B--70B), with relative gains of 10% on MMLU, 33% on MMLU Pro, 14% on GPQA, and 19% on MATH. No single data source suffices alone, highlighting the importance of diversity of sources (web crawls, curated math, academic papers, textbooks). Finally, we show that our carefully designed in-house datastore matches or outperforms web search engines such as Google Search, as well as recently proposed, complex agent-based RAG systems--all while maintaining simplicity, reproducibility, and self-containment. We release CompactDS and our retrieval pipeline, supporting future research exploring retrieval-based AI systems.
Key facts. Cited by 8 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Placed in RAG robustness and adaptive retrieval, one of 15 directions in Retrieval-augmented generation. Builds on 40 of its 52 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 2 Jul 2025.
Builds on
40 of 52 references.
Closest ancestors · 1
Same direction, newest first
Other references · 39
- 2018BERT: Pre-training of Deep Bidirectional Transformers for Language Understandingcited by 40,399
- 2019Exploring the Limits of Transfer Learning with a Unified Text-to-Text Transformercited by 14,599
- 2022Chain-of-Thought Prompting Elicits Reasoning in Large Language Modelscited by 12,459
- 2020Retrieval-Augmented Generation for Knowledge-Intensive NLP Taskscited by 9,297
- 2025Qwen3 Technical Reportcited by 8,820
- 2020Measuring Massive Multitask Language Understandingcited by 7,963
- 2021Measuring Mathematical Problem Solving With the MATH Datasetcited by 5,371
- 2020Dense Passage Retrieval for Open-Domain Question Answeringcited by 3,824
- 2023Let's Verify Step by Stepcited by 3,789
- 2023Mistral 7Bcited by 3,164
- 2017TriviaQA: A Large Scale Distantly Supervised Challenge Dataset for Reading Comprehensioncited by 2,955
- 2017Billion-scale similarity search with GPUscited by 2,497
27 more
- 2020REALM: Retrieval-Augmented Language Model Pre-Trainingcited by 2,141
- 2025Search-R1: Training LLMs to Reason and Leverage Search Engines with Reinforcement Learningcited by 1,444
- 2021Improving language models by retrieving from trillions of tokenscited by 1,293
- 2021Unsupervised Dense Information Retrieval with Contrastive Learningcited by 1,216
- 2024The FineWeb Datasets: Decanting the Web for the Finest Text Data at Scalecited by 1,160
- 2023REPLUG: Retrieval-Augmented Black-Box Language Modelscited by 792
- 2023AGIEval: A Human-Centric Benchmark for Evaluating Foundation Modelscited by 716
- 2019Latent Retrieval for Weakly Supervised Open Domain Question Answeringcited by 695
- 2020KILT: a Benchmark for Knowledge Intensive Language Taskscited by 573
- 2024Dolma: an Open Corpus of Three Trillion Tokens for Language Model Pretraining Researchcited by 483
- 2025Search-o1: Agentic Search-Enhanced Large Reasoning Modelscited by 433
- 2024DataComp-LM: In search of the next generation of training sets for language modelscited by 398
- 2023Is ChatGPT Good at Search? Investigating Large Language Models as Re-Ranking Agentscited by 360
- 2025R1-Searcher: Incentivizing the Search Capability in LLMs via Reinforcement Learningcited by 336
- 2025WebThinker: Empowering Large Reasoning Models with Deep Research Capabilitycited by 335
- 2024Generative Representational Instruction Tuningcited by 233
- 2025ZeroSearch: Incentivize the Search Capability of LLMs without Searchingcited by 208
- 2025ReSearch: Learning to Reason with Search for LLMs via Reinforcement Learningcited by 161
- 2025olmOCR: Unlocking Trillions of Tokens in PDFs with Vision Language Modelscited by 125
- 2024Long-Context LLMs Meet RAG: Overcoming Challenges for Long Inputs in RAGcited by 123
- 2024OLMES: A Standard for Language Model Evaluationscited by 106
- 2021NaturalProofs: Mathematical Theorem Proving in Natural Languagecited by 81
- 2025ReasonIR: Training Retrievers for Reasoning Taskscited by 77
- 2021The Web Is Your Oyster - Knowledge-Intensive NLP against a Very Large Web Corpuscited by 60
- 2024Scaling Retrieval-Based Language Models with a Trillion-Token Datastorecited by 56
- 2022Can Retriever-Augmented Language Models Reason? The Blame Game Between the Retriever and the Language Modelcited by 32
- 2024Great Memory, Shallow Reasoning: Limits of kNN-LMscited by 8
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2025: 4; 2026: 4.
8 papers.
- 2025Pretraining with hierarchical memories: separating long-tail and common knowledgecited by 14
- 2025Large Reasoning Embedding Models: Towards Next-Generation Dense Retrieval Paradigmcited by 9
- 2026Procedural Knowledge at Scale Improves Reasoningcited by 7
- 2026LLMs Should Express Uncertainty Explicitlycited by 6
- 2025Demystifying Scientific Problem-Solving in LLMs by Probing Knowledge and Reasoningcited by 4
- 2025Reusing Pre-Training Data at Test Time is a Compute Multipliercited by 4
- 2026RAG over Thinking Traces Can Improve Reasoning Taskscited by 2
- 2026PIXELRAG: Web Screenshots Beat Text for Retrieval-Augmented Generationcited by 2
- 2026PIXELRAG: Web Screenshots Beat Text for Retrieval-Augmented Generation1 Jun 2026
- 2026RAG over Thinking Traces Can Improve Reasoning Tasks5 May 2026
- 2026LLMs Should Express Uncertainty Explicitly7 Apr 2026
- 2026Procedural Knowledge at Scale Improves Reasoning1 Apr 2026
- 2025Reusing Pre-Training Data at Test Time is a Compute Multiplier6 Nov 2025
- 2025Large Reasoning Embedding Models: Towards Next-Generation Dense Retrieval Paradigm16 Oct 2025
- 2025Pretraining with hierarchical memories: separating long-tail and common knowledge29 Sep 2025
- 2025Demystifying Scientific Problem-Solving in LLMs by Probing Knowledge and Reasoning26 Aug 2025
Similar, not cited
Close in wording, no citation either way
- 2025RAGSmith: A Framework for Finding the Optimal Composition of Retrieval-Augmented Generation Methods Across Datasets
- 2025Retrieval-Augmented Generation: A Comprehensive Survey of Architectures, Enhancements, and Robustness Frontiers
- 2025mmRAG: A Modular Benchmark for Retrieval-Augmented Generation over Text, Tables, and Knowledge Graphs
- 2026DF-RAG: Query-Aware Diversity for Retrieval-Augmented Generation
- 2025Retrieval-augmented reasoning with lean language models
- 2025T2-RAGBench: Text-and-Table Benchmark for Evaluating Retrieval-Augmented Generation
- 2025A Systematic Review of Key Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) Systems: Progress, Gaps, and Future Directions
- 2026Mapping the RAG Landscape: A Four Axis Taxonomy of Efficiency, Defense, Interactivity, and Reasoning