mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Frustratingly Simple Retrieval Improves Challenging, Reasoning-Intensive Benchmarks

arXiv 2507.01297 ↗First posted 2 Jul 2025cs.CL cs.IRcited by 8

On the map: Retrieval-augmented generation → RAG robustness and adaptive retrieval

Abstract (arXiv)

Retrieval-augmented Generation (RAG) has primarily been studied in limited settings, such as factoid question answering; more challenging, reasoning-intensive benchmarks have seen limited success from minimal RAG. In this work, we challenge this prevailing view on established, reasoning-intensive benchmarks: MMLU, MMLU Pro, AGI Eval, GPQA, and MATH. We identify a key missing component in prior work: a usable, web-scale datastore aligned with the breadth of pretraining data. To this end, we introduce CompactDS: a diverse, high-quality, web-scale datastore that achieves high retrieval accuracy and subsecond latency on a single-node. The key insights are (1) most web content can be filtered out without sacrificing coverage, and a compact, high-quality subset is sufficient; and (2) combining in-memory approximate nearest neighbor (ANN) retrieval and on-disk exact search balances speed and recall. Using CompactDS, we show that a minimal RAG pipeline achieves consistent accuracy improvements across all benchmarks and model sizes (8B--70B), with relative gains of 10% on MMLU, 33% on MMLU Pro, 14% on GPQA, and 19% on MATH. No single data source suffices alone, highlighting the importance of diversity of sources (web crawls, curated math, academic papers, textbooks). Finally, we show that our carefully designed in-house datastore matches or outperforms web search engines such as Google Search, as well as recently proposed, complex agent-based RAG systems--all while maintaining simplicity, reproducibility, and self-containment. We release CompactDS and our retrieval pipeline, supporting future research exploring retrieval-based AI systems.

Key facts. Cited by 8 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Placed in RAG robustness and adaptive retrieval, one of 15 directions in Retrieval-augmented generation. Builds on 40 of its 52 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 2 Jul 2025.

Builds on

40 of 52 references.

Closest ancestors · 1

Same direction, newest first

  1. 2023KNN-LM Does Not Improve Open-ended Text Generation24 May

Other references · 39

  1. 2018BERT: Pre-training of Deep Bidirectional Transformers for Language Understandingcited by 40,399
  2. 2019Exploring the Limits of Transfer Learning with a Unified Text-to-Text Transformercited by 14,599
  3. 2022Chain-of-Thought Prompting Elicits Reasoning in Large Language Modelscited by 12,459
  4. 2020Retrieval-Augmented Generation for Knowledge-Intensive NLP Taskscited by 9,297
  5. 2025Qwen3 Technical Reportcited by 8,820
  6. 2020Measuring Massive Multitask Language Understandingcited by 7,963
  7. 2021Measuring Mathematical Problem Solving With the MATH Datasetcited by 5,371
  8. 2020Dense Passage Retrieval for Open-Domain Question Answeringcited by 3,824
  9. 2023Let's Verify Step by Stepcited by 3,789
  10. 2023Mistral 7Bcited by 3,164
  11. 2017TriviaQA: A Large Scale Distantly Supervised Challenge Dataset for Reading Comprehensioncited by 2,955
  12. 2017Billion-scale similarity search with GPUscited by 2,497
27 more
  1. 2020REALM: Retrieval-Augmented Language Model Pre-Trainingcited by 2,141
  2. 2025Search-R1: Training LLMs to Reason and Leverage Search Engines with Reinforcement Learningcited by 1,444
  3. 2021Improving language models by retrieving from trillions of tokenscited by 1,293
  4. 2021Unsupervised Dense Information Retrieval with Contrastive Learningcited by 1,216
  5. 2024The FineWeb Datasets: Decanting the Web for the Finest Text Data at Scalecited by 1,160
  6. 2023REPLUG: Retrieval-Augmented Black-Box Language Modelscited by 792
  7. 2023AGIEval: A Human-Centric Benchmark for Evaluating Foundation Modelscited by 716
  8. 2019Latent Retrieval for Weakly Supervised Open Domain Question Answeringcited by 695
  9. 2020KILT: a Benchmark for Knowledge Intensive Language Taskscited by 573
  10. 2024Dolma: an Open Corpus of Three Trillion Tokens for Language Model Pretraining Researchcited by 483
  11. 2025Search-o1: Agentic Search-Enhanced Large Reasoning Modelscited by 433
  12. 2024DataComp-LM: In search of the next generation of training sets for language modelscited by 398
  13. 2023Is ChatGPT Good at Search? Investigating Large Language Models as Re-Ranking Agentscited by 360
  14. 2025R1-Searcher: Incentivizing the Search Capability in LLMs via Reinforcement Learningcited by 336
  15. 2025WebThinker: Empowering Large Reasoning Models with Deep Research Capabilitycited by 335
  16. 2024Generative Representational Instruction Tuningcited by 233
  17. 2025ZeroSearch: Incentivize the Search Capability of LLMs without Searchingcited by 208
  18. 2025ReSearch: Learning to Reason with Search for LLMs via Reinforcement Learningcited by 161
  19. 2025olmOCR: Unlocking Trillions of Tokens in PDFs with Vision Language Modelscited by 125
  20. 2024Long-Context LLMs Meet RAG: Overcoming Challenges for Long Inputs in RAGcited by 123
  21. 2024OLMES: A Standard for Language Model Evaluationscited by 106
  22. 2021NaturalProofs: Mathematical Theorem Proving in Natural Languagecited by 81
  23. 2025ReasonIR: Training Retrievers for Reasoning Taskscited by 77
  24. 2021The Web Is Your Oyster - Knowledge-Intensive NLP against a Very Large Web Corpuscited by 60
  25. 2024Scaling Retrieval-Based Language Models with a Trillion-Token Datastorecited by 56
  26. 2022Can Retriever-Augmented Language Models Reason? The Blame Game Between the Retriever and the Language Modelcited by 32
  27. 2024Great Memory, Shallow Reasoning: Limits of kNN-LMscited by 8

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2025: 4; 2026: 4.

8 papers.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2025RAGSmith: A Framework for Finding the Optimal Composition of Retrieval-Augmented Generation Methods Across Datasets
  2. 2025Retrieval-Augmented Generation: A Comprehensive Survey of Architectures, Enhancements, and Robustness Frontiers
  3. 2025mmRAG: A Modular Benchmark for Retrieval-Augmented Generation over Text, Tables, and Knowledge Graphs
  4. 2026DF-RAG: Query-Aware Diversity for Retrieval-Augmented Generation
  5. 2025Retrieval-augmented reasoning with lean language models
  6. 2025T2-RAGBench: Text-and-Table Benchmark for Evaluating Retrieval-Augmented Generation
  7. 2025A Systematic Review of Key Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) Systems: Progress, Gaps, and Future Directions
  8. 2026Mapping the RAG Landscape: A Four Axis Taxonomy of Efficiency, Defense, Interactivity, and Reasoning