mmRAG: A Modular Benchmark for Retrieval-Augmented Generation over Text, Tables, and Knowledge Graphs
On the map: Retrieval-augmented generation → RAG pipeline design and evaluation
Abstract (arXiv)
Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) has emerged as a powerful paradigm for enhancing the capabilities of large language models. However, existing RAG evaluation predominantly focuses on text retrieval and relies on opaque, end-to-end assessments of generated outputs. To address these limitations, we introduce mmRAG, a modular benchmark designed for evaluating multi-modal RAG systems. Our benchmark integrates queries from six diverse question-answering datasets spanning text, tables, and knowledge graphs, which we uniformly convert into retrievable documents. To enable direct, granular evaluation of individual RAG components -- such as the accuracy of retrieval and query routing -- beyond end-to-end generation quality, we follow standard information retrieval procedures to annotate document relevance and derive dataset relevance. We establish baseline performance by evaluating a wide range of RAG implementations on mmRAG.
Key facts. Cited by 5 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Placed in RAG pipeline design and evaluation, one of 15 directions in Retrieval-augmented generation. Builds on 27 of its 37 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 16 May 2025.
Builds on
27 of 37 references.
Closest ancestors · 4
Same direction, newest first
- 2024A Comprehensive Survey of Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG): Evolution, Current Landscape and Future Directions3 Oct
- 2024BERGEN: A Benchmarking Library for Retrieval-Augmented Generation1 Jul
- 2024RAGBench: Explainable Benchmark for Retrieval-Augmented Generation Systems25 Jun
- 2024A Survey on RAG Meeting LLMs: Towards Retrieval-Augmented Large Language Models10 May
Other references · 23
- 2020Dense Passage Retrieval for Open-Domain Question Answeringcited by 3,824
- 2018HotpotQA: A Dataset for Diverse, Explainable Multi-hop Question Answeringcited by 3,754
- 2017TriviaQA: A Large Scale Distantly Supervised Challenge Dataset for Reading Comprehensioncited by 2,955
- 2021Unsupervised Dense Information Retrieval with Contrastive Learningcited by 1,216
- 2019OK-VQA: A Visual Question Answering Benchmark Requiring External Knowledgecited by 1,121
- 2024ChatGLM: A Family of Large Language Models from GLM-130B to GLM-4 All Toolscited by 1,121
- 2023Towards General Text Embeddings with Multi-stage Contrastive Learningcited by 723
- 2020KILT: a Benchmark for Knowledge Intensive Language Taskscited by 573
- 2018The Web as a Knowledge-base for Answering Complex Questionscited by 410
- 2021TAT-QA: A Question Answering Benchmark on a Hybrid of Tabular and Textual Content in Financecited by 408
- 2023Benchmarking Large Language Models in Retrieval-Augmented Generationcited by 312
- 2020HybridQA: A Dataset of Multi-Hop Question Answering over Tabular and Textual Datacited by 264
11 more
- 2024VisRAG: Vision-based Retrieval-augmented Generation on Multi-modality Documentscited by 245
- 2024mGTE: Generalized Long-Context Text Representation and Reranking Models for Multilingual Text Retrievalcited by 236
- 2024G-Retriever: Retrieval-Augmented Generation for Textual Graph Understanding and Question Answeringcited by 223
- 2016FVQA: Fact-based Visual Question Answeringcited by 181
- 2021MultiModalQA: Complex Question Answering over Text, Tables and Imagescited by 179
- 2020Open Question Answering over Tables and Textcited by 163
- 2023ChatKBQA: A Generate-then-Retrieve Framework for Knowledge Base Question Answering with Fine-tuned Large Language Modelscited by 44
- 2024MAIR: A Massive Benchmark for Evaluating Instructed Retrievalcited by 23
- 2023CompMix: A Benchmark for Heterogeneous Question Answeringcited by 12
- 2024ProCIS: A Benchmark for Proactive Retrieval in Conversationscited by 11
- 2024DEXTER: A Benchmark for open-domain Complex Question Answering using LLMscited by 4
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2025: 1; 2026: 4.
5 papers.
- 2025Are We on the Right Way for Assessing Document Retrieval-Augmented Generation?cited by 5
- 2026Coverage, Not Averages: Semantic Stratification for Trustworthy Retrieval Evaluationcited by 2
- 2026FollowTable: A Benchmark for Instruction-Following Table Retrievalcited by 0
- 2026Semantically Similar, Logically Distinct: Diagnosing the Semantic-Answerability Gap in Table RAGcited by 0
- 2026WorkSurface-Bench: Benchmarking Enterprise Agents on Multi-Surface Knowledge Routingcited by 0
- 2026WorkSurface-Bench: Benchmarking Enterprise Agents on Multi-Surface Knowledge Routing28 Jul 2026
- 2026Semantically Similar, Logically Distinct: Diagnosing the Semantic-Answerability Gap in Table RAG20 Jul 2026
- 2026FollowTable: A Benchmark for Instruction-Following Table Retrieval1 May 2026
- 2026Coverage, Not Averages: Semantic Stratification for Trustworthy Retrieval Evaluation22 Apr 2026
- 2025Are We on the Right Way for Assessing Document Retrieval-Augmented Generation?5 Aug 2025
Similar, not cited
Close in wording, no citation either way
- 2025A Survey on Knowledge-Oriented Retrieval-Augmented Generation
- 2025A Systematic Review of Key Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) Systems: Progress, Gaps, and Future Directions
- 2025Retrieval Augmented Generation Evaluation in the Era of Large Language Models: A Comprehensive Survey
- 2024Evaluation of Retrieval-Augmented Generation: A Survey
- 2024CoFE-RAG: A Comprehensive Full-chain Evaluation Framework for Retrieval-Augmented Generation with Enhanced Data Diversity
- 2025NodeRAG: Structuring Graph-based RAG with Heterogeneous Nodes
- 2025RAG vs. GraphRAG: A Systematic Evaluation and Key Insights
- 2025Enhancing Retrieval-Augmented Generation: A Study of Best Practices